Endovascular management options and techniques for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Ming Hao Guo MD, MSc , Thomas Le Houérou MD , Antoine Gaudin MD , Alessandro Costanzo MD , Dominique Fabre MD, PhD , Stéphan Haulon MD, PhD
{"title":"Endovascular management options and techniques for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm","authors":"Ming Hao Guo MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Thomas Le Houérou MD ,&nbsp;Antoine Gaudin MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Costanzo MD ,&nbsp;Dominique Fabre MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stéphan Haulon MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Open surgical repair of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (rTAAAs) carries significant risk of mortality and morbidity; in recent years, endovascular repair has emerged as a suitable alternative. This article aims to review currently available technologies, techniques, and outcomes for endovascular repair of rTAAA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A narrative review of current literature was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Off-the-shelf branched endografts are available and are often the first-line endovascular therapy for types I, II, and III rTAAA or type IV rTAAA with a lumen diameter ≥24 mm at the level of the renovisceral vessels. In patients with anatomy unsuitable for off-the-shelf branch devices, particularly those with ruptured type IV or pararenal TAAA with a narrow aortic lumen, endovascular repair with in situ laser fenestration is a reasonable alternative. Physician-modified devices as well as endovascular repair with parallel stent grafts (chimney, periscope, sandwich, or Octopus) have been described by select centers with satisfactory outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with rTAAA and suitable anatomy who are at high or prohibitive surgical risk can be managed endovascularly with comparable outcomes. Various techniques are described in the literature, and the choice of technique used should depend on patient anatomy and surgeon expertise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000461/pdfft?md5=a38cfdca2e9e9afc24ffd6d2bf1ee9ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000461-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Open surgical repair of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (rTAAAs) carries significant risk of mortality and morbidity; in recent years, endovascular repair has emerged as a suitable alternative. This article aims to review currently available technologies, techniques, and outcomes for endovascular repair of rTAAA.

Methods

A narrative review of current literature was performed.

Results

Off-the-shelf branched endografts are available and are often the first-line endovascular therapy for types I, II, and III rTAAA or type IV rTAAA with a lumen diameter ≥24 mm at the level of the renovisceral vessels. In patients with anatomy unsuitable for off-the-shelf branch devices, particularly those with ruptured type IV or pararenal TAAA with a narrow aortic lumen, endovascular repair with in situ laser fenestration is a reasonable alternative. Physician-modified devices as well as endovascular repair with parallel stent grafts (chimney, periscope, sandwich, or Octopus) have been described by select centers with satisfactory outcomes.

Conclusions

Patients with rTAAA and suitable anatomy who are at high or prohibitive surgical risk can be managed endovascularly with comparable outcomes. Various techniques are described in the literature, and the choice of technique used should depend on patient anatomy and surgeon expertise.

胸腹主动脉瘤破裂的血管内治疗方案和技术
目的对破裂的胸腹主动脉瘤(rTAAAs)进行开放性手术修复有很大的死亡率和发病率风险;近年来,血管内修复已成为一种合适的替代方法。本文旨在回顾目前可用的rTAAA血管内修复技术、技巧和结果。结果现成的分支内移植物已经上市,通常是治疗I、II和III型rTAAA或IV型rTAAA(内腔直径≥24毫米,位于内脏翻修血管水平)的一线血管内疗法。对于解剖结构不适合使用现成分支装置的患者,尤其是主动脉腔狭窄的 IV 型或副瓣 TAAA 破裂的患者,使用原位激光栅栏进行血管内修复是一种合理的替代方法。结论对于具有高手术风险或手术风险过高、解剖结构合适的 rTAAA 患者,可以采用血管内修复术进行治疗,且疗效相当。文献中介绍了多种技术,选择哪种技术应取决于患者的解剖结构和外科医生的专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信