Prediction of the influence of pressure on flash points of liquid fuels at sub-atmospheric pressure

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Horng-Jang Liaw
{"title":"Prediction of the influence of pressure on flash points of liquid fuels at sub-atmospheric pressure","authors":"Horng-Jang Liaw","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Aircraft fuel tanks experience sub-atmospheric pressure during flight, and so do fuels during storage and transportation at high altitudes. Additionally, chemical processes commonly operate at non-atmospheric pressure. Flash points measured at sub-atmospheric pressure are lower than those measured at the standard atmospheric pressure of 101.3 kPa, signifying that ignitable liquids at sub-atmospheric pressure are more hazardous than those at 101.3 kPa. This study developed a model for predicting the influence of pressure on flash points on the basis of basic thermodynamic characteristics; this model was validated against experimental data obtained from the literature for six single-component and multiple-component liquid fuels at sub-atmospheric pressure. The proposed model effectively predicts closed-cup flash points, with small deviations in the range 0.18 °C–1.25 °C. However, because the model's assumption of vapor–liquid equilibrium was violated in the experiments, the predicted open-cup flash points did not agree well with their experimental counterparts, with the deviations in the range 1.11 °C–12.55 °C. Nevertheless, the trends predicted by the model agreed with those in the experimental data. Furthermore, standard flash point test method (such as ASTM <span>D56</span><svg><path></path></svg>-22, <span>ASTM</span><svg><path></path></svg> <span>D93</span><svg><path></path></svg>-20, and <span>ASTM</span><svg><path></path></svg> <span>D7094</span><svg><path></path></svg>-17) are based on a linear formula for correcting flash points measured at pressures other than 101.3 kPa. When the ambient pressure is approximately 101.3 kPa during flash point testing, the slope value of the correction formula should be changed from 0.25 to 0.20.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aircraft fuel tanks experience sub-atmospheric pressure during flight, and so do fuels during storage and transportation at high altitudes. Additionally, chemical processes commonly operate at non-atmospheric pressure. Flash points measured at sub-atmospheric pressure are lower than those measured at the standard atmospheric pressure of 101.3 kPa, signifying that ignitable liquids at sub-atmospheric pressure are more hazardous than those at 101.3 kPa. This study developed a model for predicting the influence of pressure on flash points on the basis of basic thermodynamic characteristics; this model was validated against experimental data obtained from the literature for six single-component and multiple-component liquid fuels at sub-atmospheric pressure. The proposed model effectively predicts closed-cup flash points, with small deviations in the range 0.18 °C–1.25 °C. However, because the model's assumption of vapor–liquid equilibrium was violated in the experiments, the predicted open-cup flash points did not agree well with their experimental counterparts, with the deviations in the range 1.11 °C–12.55 °C. Nevertheless, the trends predicted by the model agreed with those in the experimental data. Furthermore, standard flash point test method (such as ASTM D56-22, ASTM D93-20, and ASTM D7094-17) are based on a linear formula for correcting flash points measured at pressures other than 101.3 kPa. When the ambient pressure is approximately 101.3 kPa during flash point testing, the slope value of the correction formula should be changed from 0.25 to 0.20.

预测压力对亚大气压下液体燃料闪点的影响
飞机油箱在飞行过程中承受着低于大气压的压力,燃料在高空储存和运输过程中也是如此。此外,化学过程通常在非大气压下进行。在次大气压下测得的闪点低于在 101.3 kPa 标准大气压下测得的闪点,这表明次大气压下的可燃液体比 101.3 kPa 下的可燃液体更危险。本研究根据基本热力学特性建立了一个预测压力对闪点影响的模型;该模型与文献中获得的六种单组分和多组分液体燃料在亚大气压下的实验数据进行了验证。所提出的模型可有效预测闭杯闪点,偏差范围在 0.18 °C-1.25 °C 之间。然而,由于在实验中违反了模型的汽液平衡假设,因此预测的开杯闪点与实验结果并不完全一致,偏差范围在 1.11 °C-12.55 °C。不过,模型预测的趋势与实验数据一致。此外,标准闪点测试方法(如 ASTM D56-22、ASTM D93-20 和 ASTM D7094-17)都是基于线性公式来校正在 101.3 千帕以外的压力下测得的闪点。在闪点测试过程中,当环境压力约为 101.3 千帕时,校正公式的斜率值应由 0.25 改为 0.20。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信