The Cultural Formulation Interview in Case Formulations: A State-of-the-Science Review

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"The Cultural Formulation Interview in Case Formulations: A State-of-the-Science Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The publication of the 16-item Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in DSM-5 has initiated a robust line of international scholarship on whether patients and clinicians find it feasible, acceptable, and useful in different practice settings. Studies have routinely concluded that the CFI improves rapport when clinicians use it with patients, though less attention has been focused on how clinicians use information from the CFI in clinical tasks or case formulations. This state-of-the-science review describes the development of the CFI and uses a specific methodology, the state-of-the-art review, to analyze peer-reviewed studies reporting how clinicians have used information from the CFI in clinical tasks, namely diagnostic and treatment planning. Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, with 10 indicating that the CFI was helpful for these tasks. All studies emphasized that the CFI can help clinicians understand the social contexts of patients’ lives. The article concludes with an agenda for future research, such as exploring how preexisting conceptions of culture influence clinical decision making and determining how the CFI affects case formulations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"55 6","pages":"Pages 1130-1143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000789","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The publication of the 16-item Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) in DSM-5 has initiated a robust line of international scholarship on whether patients and clinicians find it feasible, acceptable, and useful in different practice settings. Studies have routinely concluded that the CFI improves rapport when clinicians use it with patients, though less attention has been focused on how clinicians use information from the CFI in clinical tasks or case formulations. This state-of-the-science review describes the development of the CFI and uses a specific methodology, the state-of-the-art review, to analyze peer-reviewed studies reporting how clinicians have used information from the CFI in clinical tasks, namely diagnostic and treatment planning. Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, with 10 indicating that the CFI was helpful for these tasks. All studies emphasized that the CFI can help clinicians understand the social contexts of patients’ lives. The article concludes with an agenda for future research, such as exploring how preexisting conceptions of culture influence clinical decision making and determining how the CFI affects case formulations.
案例研究中的文化表述访谈:科学现状综述
DSM-5 中公布的 16 项文化表述访谈(CFI)引发了国际学术界对患者和临床医生是否认为该访谈在不同的实践环境中可行、可接受和有用的热烈讨论。研究得出的常规结论是,当临床医生与患者一起使用文化构成访谈时,可以改善双方的关系,但对于临床医生如何在临床任务或病例制定中使用文化构成访谈的信息则关注较少。这篇最新科学综述介绍了 CFI 的发展,并使用一种特定的方法(最新综述)分析了同行评议的研究,这些研究报告了临床医生如何在临床任务(即诊断和治疗计划)中使用 CFI 中的信息。有 12 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 10 项研究表明 CFI 对这些任务有帮助。所有研究都强调,CFI 可以帮助临床医生了解患者生活的社会背景。文章最后提出了未来研究的议程,例如探索已有的文化观念如何影响临床决策,以及确定 CFI 如何影响病例的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信