Do investors benefit from MiFID II unbundling?

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Emelie Fröberg , Michael Halling
{"title":"Do investors benefit from MiFID II unbundling?","authors":"Emelie Fröberg ,&nbsp;Michael Halling","doi":"10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The MiFID II regulation led to the unbundling of research and execution costs in Europe starting in 2018. We exploit the early adoption of an unbundling rule in Sweden in 2016 to provide evidence on the implications of unbundling for fund investors. Using a difference-in-differences framework and hand-collected data on bundled and unbundled commissions, we find no economically meaningful effect of unbundling on commissions. When we split the sample into more active and less active funds, we find that fund costs of more active funds increased in relative terms. Finally, we do not find evidence that the increased transparency of observing execution and research costs led to improved fund performance or information gains for investors’ fund selection process. Overall, our results suggest that investors did not significantly benefit from the unbundling of commissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15525,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Finance","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 102615"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929119924000774","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The MiFID II regulation led to the unbundling of research and execution costs in Europe starting in 2018. We exploit the early adoption of an unbundling rule in Sweden in 2016 to provide evidence on the implications of unbundling for fund investors. Using a difference-in-differences framework and hand-collected data on bundled and unbundled commissions, we find no economically meaningful effect of unbundling on commissions. When we split the sample into more active and less active funds, we find that fund costs of more active funds increased in relative terms. Finally, we do not find evidence that the increased transparency of observing execution and research costs led to improved fund performance or information gains for investors’ fund selection process. Overall, our results suggest that investors did not significantly benefit from the unbundling of commissions.

投资者是否受益于 MiFID II 的分拆?
MiFID II 法规导致欧洲从 2018 年开始对研究和执行成本进行分拆。我们利用瑞典在 2016 年提前采用分拆规则的机会,提供证据说明分拆对基金投资者的影响。利用差分法框架和手工收集的捆绑和非捆绑佣金数据,我们发现松绑对佣金没有经济意义上的影响。当我们将样本分为较活跃和不太活跃的基金时,我们发现较活跃基金的基金成本相对增加。最后,我们没有发现证据表明,观察执行和研究成本透明度的提高导致了基金业绩的改善或投资者选择基金过程中的信息收益。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,投资者并未从佣金分拆中明显受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Corporate Finance
Journal of Corporate Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Corporate Finance aims to publish high quality, original manuscripts that analyze issues related to corporate finance. Contributions can be of a theoretical, empirical, or clinical nature. Topical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: financial structure, payout policies, corporate restructuring, financial contracts, corporate governance arrangements, the economics of organizations, the influence of legal structures, and international financial management. Papers that apply asset pricing and microstructure analysis to corporate finance issues are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信