Collaborative activities in hybrid learning environments: Exploring teacher orchestration load and students’ perceptions

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Alejandro Ortega-Arranz , Ishari Amarasinghe , Alejandra Martínez-Monés , Juan I. Asensio-Pérez , Yannis Dimitriadis , Mario Corrales-Astorgano , Davinia Hernández-Leo
{"title":"Collaborative activities in hybrid learning environments: Exploring teacher orchestration load and students’ perceptions","authors":"Alejandro Ortega-Arranz ,&nbsp;Ishari Amarasinghe ,&nbsp;Alejandra Martínez-Monés ,&nbsp;Juan I. Asensio-Pérez ,&nbsp;Yannis Dimitriadis ,&nbsp;Mario Corrales-Astorgano ,&nbsp;Davinia Hernández-Leo","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recent Covid-19 pandemic made universities rethink their traditional educational models, shifting, in some cases, to pure online or hybrid models. Hybrid settings usually involve onsite (<em>i.e.</em>, in the classroom) and online (<em>e.g.</em>, in a different classroom, at home) students simultaneously under the instruction of the same teacher. However, while these models provide more flexibility to students, hybridity poses additional challenges for the specific case of collaborative learning, likely increasing the teachers' orchestration load and potentially hampering fruitful interactions among learners. In order to gather empirical evidence on the impact of hybridity in collaborative learning, this paper reports a study conducted in a hybrid classroom where a Jigsaw collaborative pattern was implemented with the Engageli software. The study involved 2 teachers and 67 students enrolled in a computer science undergraduate course. Teachers' post-interviews, questionnaires and an epistemic network analysis (ENA) were used to produce study findings. Results show that teachers reported a medium-to-high orchestration load for implementing and setting up the collaborative activities in the hybrid classroom. Among the factors that contributed most to such load, teachers highlighted the creation and live management of groups and collaborative documents. Additionally, the ENA showed that teachers put much effort on monitoring group interactions and solving technical issues. Finally, we observed relevant differences on students' perceptions (<em>e.g.</em>, satisfaction with the attention received by the teachers) based on the cohort sizes and on the students’ attendance modality (onsite vs. online).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 105105"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001192/pdfft?md5=8b1f3e93053d5cc237b80a2a26820df4&pid=1-s2.0-S0360131524001192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131524001192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent Covid-19 pandemic made universities rethink their traditional educational models, shifting, in some cases, to pure online or hybrid models. Hybrid settings usually involve onsite (i.e., in the classroom) and online (e.g., in a different classroom, at home) students simultaneously under the instruction of the same teacher. However, while these models provide more flexibility to students, hybridity poses additional challenges for the specific case of collaborative learning, likely increasing the teachers' orchestration load and potentially hampering fruitful interactions among learners. In order to gather empirical evidence on the impact of hybridity in collaborative learning, this paper reports a study conducted in a hybrid classroom where a Jigsaw collaborative pattern was implemented with the Engageli software. The study involved 2 teachers and 67 students enrolled in a computer science undergraduate course. Teachers' post-interviews, questionnaires and an epistemic network analysis (ENA) were used to produce study findings. Results show that teachers reported a medium-to-high orchestration load for implementing and setting up the collaborative activities in the hybrid classroom. Among the factors that contributed most to such load, teachers highlighted the creation and live management of groups and collaborative documents. Additionally, the ENA showed that teachers put much effort on monitoring group interactions and solving technical issues. Finally, we observed relevant differences on students' perceptions (e.g., satisfaction with the attention received by the teachers) based on the cohort sizes and on the students’ attendance modality (onsite vs. online).

混合学习环境中的协作活动:探究教师的安排负荷和学生的看法
最近流行的 Covid-19 使大学重新思考其传统的教育模式,在某些情况下转向纯在线或混合模式。混合模式通常是指学生在同一教师的指导下,同时在现场(即在教室)和在线(如在不同的教室、在家里)学习。然而,虽然这些模式为学生提供了更多的灵活性,但混合式教学也为协作学习的具体情况带来了额外的挑战,可能会增加教师的协调负担,并可能阻碍学习者之间富有成效的互动。为了收集有关混合模式在协作学习中的影响的实证证据,本文报告了一项在混合课堂上进行的研究,在该混合课堂上使用 Engageli 软件实施了 Jigsaw 协作模式。这项研究涉及 2 名教师和 67 名计算机科学本科生。教师的后期访谈、问卷调查和认识网络分析(ENA)被用来得出研究结果。结果显示,教师在混合课堂中实施和设置协作活动的协调工作量为中等至高等。在造成这种负担的最主要因素中,教师们强调了小组和协作文件的创建和实时管理。此外,ENA 显示,教师在监控小组互动和解决技术问题方面投入了大量精力。最后,我们观察到学生的看法(如对教师关注的满意度)因学生人数和上课方式(现场与在线)而有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信