{"title":"Intraoperative diagnosis of breast cancer metastasis in axillary lymph nodes: Cytological Smear vs. Frozen Section","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intraoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes is sometimes required to determine the extent of surgery. In this study, we wished to assess the reliability of cytologic smear (CS) in determining lymph node involvement with tumor. Theoretically, CS provides more substance for examination than touch-imprint cytology and is faster to perform than frozen section (FS). We hypothesized that CS sensitivity for tumor cell detection in the lymph nodes would be similar to FS, at least 0.90.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective observational study at the Rambam Health Care Campus (January, 2013-June, 2020). Lymph nodes underwent intraoperative evaluation using either CS or FS, based on the availability of a cytologist at the time of the examination. Both intraoperative evaluations were compared to the final pathology following fixation with formalin.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighty-eight patients undergoing intraoperative analysis were analyzed (51 CS, 37 FS). False-negative tests were recorded in only 1 patient evaluated by each of the 2 methods. This resulted in sensitivity 0.91 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for CS and 0.88 (95%CI 0.47, 1.00) for FS, specificity 1.00 (95%CI 0.91, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.88, 1.00) for FS, positive predictive value 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for FS, and negative predictive value 0.98 (95%CI 0.87, 1.00) for CS and 0.97 (95%CI 0.83, 1.00) for FS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The sensitivity of the CS in this study is comparable to that of FS and due to shorter analysis time required is the preferred method at our institution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526820924001502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Intraoperative evaluation of axillary lymph nodes is sometimes required to determine the extent of surgery. In this study, we wished to assess the reliability of cytologic smear (CS) in determining lymph node involvement with tumor. Theoretically, CS provides more substance for examination than touch-imprint cytology and is faster to perform than frozen section (FS). We hypothesized that CS sensitivity for tumor cell detection in the lymph nodes would be similar to FS, at least 0.90.
Methods
This was a retrospective observational study at the Rambam Health Care Campus (January, 2013-June, 2020). Lymph nodes underwent intraoperative evaluation using either CS or FS, based on the availability of a cytologist at the time of the examination. Both intraoperative evaluations were compared to the final pathology following fixation with formalin.
Results
Eighty-eight patients undergoing intraoperative analysis were analyzed (51 CS, 37 FS). False-negative tests were recorded in only 1 patient evaluated by each of the 2 methods. This resulted in sensitivity 0.91 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for CS and 0.88 (95%CI 0.47, 1.00) for FS, specificity 1.00 (95%CI 0.91, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.88, 1.00) for FS, positive predictive value 1.00 (95%CI 0.69, 1.00) for CS and 1.00 (95%CI 0.59, 1.00) for FS, and negative predictive value 0.98 (95%CI 0.87, 1.00) for CS and 0.97 (95%CI 0.83, 1.00) for FS.
Conclusions
The sensitivity of the CS in this study is comparable to that of FS and due to shorter analysis time required is the preferred method at our institution.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.