Gait classification of knee osteoarthritis patients using shoe-embedded internal measurement units sensor

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ahmed Raza , Yusuke Sekiguchi , Haruki Yaguchi , Keita Honda , Kenichiro Fukushi , Chenhui Huang , Kazuki Ihara , Yoshitaka Nozaki , Kentaro Nakahara , Shin-Ichi Izumi , Satoru Ebihara
{"title":"Gait classification of knee osteoarthritis patients using shoe-embedded internal measurement units sensor","authors":"Ahmed Raza ,&nbsp;Yusuke Sekiguchi ,&nbsp;Haruki Yaguchi ,&nbsp;Keita Honda ,&nbsp;Kenichiro Fukushi ,&nbsp;Chenhui Huang ,&nbsp;Kazuki Ihara ,&nbsp;Yoshitaka Nozaki ,&nbsp;Kentaro Nakahara ,&nbsp;Shin-Ichi Izumi ,&nbsp;Satoru Ebihara","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Knee osteoarthritis negatively affects the gait of patients, especially that of elderly people. However, the assessment of wearable sensors in knee osteoarthritis patients has been under-researched. During clinical assessments, patients may change their gait patterns under the placebo effect, whereas wearable sensors can be used in any environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty patients with knee osteoarthritis and 20 control subjects were included in the study. Wearing shoes with an IMU sensor embedded in the insoles, the participants were required to walk along a walkway. The sensor data were collected during the gait. To discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and to classify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis patients (patients scheduled for surgery vs. patients not scheduled for surgery; bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis), we used a machine learning approach called the support vector machine. A total of 88 features were extracted and used for classification.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The patients vs. healthy participants were classified with 71% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 56% specificity. The “patients scheduled for surgery” vs. “patients not scheduled for surgery” were classified with 83% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, and 81% specificity. The bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis was classified with 81% accuracy, 75% sensitivity, and 79% specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Gait analysis using wearable sensors and machine learning can discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and classify different subgroups with reasonable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed approach requires no complex gait factors and is not limited to controlled laboratory settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Knee osteoarthritis negatively affects the gait of patients, especially that of elderly people. However, the assessment of wearable sensors in knee osteoarthritis patients has been under-researched. During clinical assessments, patients may change their gait patterns under the placebo effect, whereas wearable sensors can be used in any environment.

Methods

Sixty patients with knee osteoarthritis and 20 control subjects were included in the study. Wearing shoes with an IMU sensor embedded in the insoles, the participants were required to walk along a walkway. The sensor data were collected during the gait. To discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and to classify different subgroups of knee osteoarthritis patients (patients scheduled for surgery vs. patients not scheduled for surgery; bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis), we used a machine learning approach called the support vector machine. A total of 88 features were extracted and used for classification.

Findings

The patients vs. healthy participants were classified with 71% accuracy, 85% sensitivity, and 56% specificity. The “patients scheduled for surgery” vs. “patients not scheduled for surgery” were classified with 83% accuracy, 83% sensitivity, and 81% specificity. The bilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis vs. unilateral knee osteoarthritis diagnosis was classified with 81% accuracy, 75% sensitivity, and 79% specificity.

Interpretation

Gait analysis using wearable sensors and machine learning can discriminate between healthy and knee osteoarthritis patients and classify different subgroups with reasonable accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. The proposed approach requires no complex gait factors and is not limited to controlled laboratory settings.

使用鞋内嵌入式测量单元传感器对膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行步态分类
背景膝关节骨关节炎对患者的步态有负面影响,尤其是老年人。然而,对膝关节骨关节炎患者使用可穿戴传感器进行评估的研究一直不足。在临床评估中,患者可能会在安慰剂效应下改变步态,而可穿戴传感器可以在任何环境下使用。受试者穿上鞋垫内嵌 IMU 传感器的鞋子,在人行道上行走。在步态过程中收集传感器数据。为了区分健康膝关节骨关节炎患者和膝关节骨关节炎患者,并对膝关节骨关节炎患者的不同亚组(计划手术患者与未计划手术患者;诊断为双侧膝关节骨关节炎与诊断为单侧膝关节骨关节炎)进行分类,我们使用了一种名为支持向量机的机器学习方法。结果患者与健康参与者的分类准确率为 71%,灵敏度为 85%,特异性为 56%。计划手术患者 "与 "未计划手术患者 "的分类准确率为 83%,灵敏度为 83%,特异性为 81%。使用可穿戴传感器和机器学习进行步态分析,可以区分健康患者和膝关节骨关节炎患者,并以合理的准确性、灵敏度和特异性对不同亚组进行分类。所提出的方法不需要复杂的步态因素,也不局限于受控实验室环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信