ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KUAT TEKAN BETON NORMAL DENGAN BETON CAMPURAN BAN BEKAS

M. Nurrosyid, Hanggara Yudi Susanto, Hartopo Hartopo, Totok Apriyanto
{"title":"ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KUAT TEKAN BETON NORMAL DENGAN BETON CAMPURAN BAN BEKAS","authors":"M. Nurrosyid, Hanggara Yudi Susanto, Hartopo Hartopo, Totok Apriyanto","doi":"10.61689/jti.v5i1.548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the comparison of compressive strength between conventional concrete and concrete mix with used tire aggregate, focusing on its influence on compressive strength and concrete weight. The testing used cylindrical specimens with variations of used tire addition at 3%, 6%, 9%, and 12% of the coarse aggregate volume. The targeted concrete design strength is fc' 20 MPa at 28 days. Experimental methods were employed to compare their mechanical properties, measuring compressive strength and concrete weight across different mix compositions. The results for normal concrete yielded an average of 30.96 MPa, while for 3% tire mix yielded an average of 30.12 MPa, 6% tire mix yielded an average of 25.51 MPa, 9% tire mix yielded an average of 22.51 MPa, and 12% tire mix yielded an average of 21.54 MPa. The reduction in concrete weight for 3% tire mix was 0.035 kg from normal concrete, for 6% tire mix was 0.04 kg from normal concrete, for 9% tire mix was 0.23 kg from normal concrete, and for 12% tire mix was 0.35 kg from normal concrete. The study findings indicate that concrete mix with used tire aggregate exhibits competitive compressive strength with conventional concrete, while showing a tendency towards lower weight. The implication is that concrete mix with used tire aggregate has the potential to be a lighter and mechanically strong alternative. This study provides important insights for the construction industry in seeking more sustainable and cost-efficient solutions, while reducing the environmental impact of used tire waste.","PeriodicalId":447787,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61689/jti.v5i1.548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the comparison of compressive strength between conventional concrete and concrete mix with used tire aggregate, focusing on its influence on compressive strength and concrete weight. The testing used cylindrical specimens with variations of used tire addition at 3%, 6%, 9%, and 12% of the coarse aggregate volume. The targeted concrete design strength is fc' 20 MPa at 28 days. Experimental methods were employed to compare their mechanical properties, measuring compressive strength and concrete weight across different mix compositions. The results for normal concrete yielded an average of 30.96 MPa, while for 3% tire mix yielded an average of 30.12 MPa, 6% tire mix yielded an average of 25.51 MPa, 9% tire mix yielded an average of 22.51 MPa, and 12% tire mix yielded an average of 21.54 MPa. The reduction in concrete weight for 3% tire mix was 0.035 kg from normal concrete, for 6% tire mix was 0.04 kg from normal concrete, for 9% tire mix was 0.23 kg from normal concrete, and for 12% tire mix was 0.35 kg from normal concrete. The study findings indicate that concrete mix with used tire aggregate exhibits competitive compressive strength with conventional concrete, while showing a tendency towards lower weight. The implication is that concrete mix with used tire aggregate has the potential to be a lighter and mechanically strong alternative. This study provides important insights for the construction industry in seeking more sustainable and cost-efficient solutions, while reducing the environmental impact of used tire waste.
普通混凝土与旧轮胎混合混凝土抗压强度对比分析
本研究评估了传统混凝土与添加废旧轮胎骨料的混凝土拌合物之间的抗压强度比较,重点关注其对抗压强度和混凝土重量的影响。测试使用圆柱形试样,废旧轮胎的添加量分别为粗骨料体积的 3%、6%、9% 和 12%。目标混凝土设计强度为 28 天时 fc' 20 兆帕。采用实验方法比较了它们的机械性能,测量了不同混合成分的抗压强度和混凝土重量。结果显示,普通混凝土的平均抗压强度为 30.96 兆帕,而 3% 轮胎拌合物的平均抗压强度为 30.12 兆帕,6% 轮胎拌合物的平均抗压强度为 25.51 兆帕,9% 轮胎拌合物的平均抗压强度为 22.51 兆帕,12% 轮胎拌合物的平均抗压强度为 21.54 兆帕。3% 轮胎拌合物的混凝土重量比普通混凝土减少了 0.035 千克,6% 轮胎拌合物的混凝土重量比普通混凝土减少了 0.04 千克,9% 轮胎拌合物的混凝土重量比普通混凝土减少了 0.23 千克,12% 轮胎拌合物的混凝土重量比普通混凝土减少了 0.35 千克。研究结果表明,使用废旧轮胎骨料的混凝土拌合物的抗压强度与普通混凝土相比具有竞争力,但重量却有减轻的趋势。这意味着,使用废旧轮胎骨料的混凝土拌合物有可能成为一种更轻、机械强度更高的替代品。这项研究为建筑行业提供了重要的启示,帮助他们寻求更具可持续性和成本效益的解决方案,同时减少废旧轮胎对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信