Past, Present, and Future of Learning Agility: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis

IF 4.6 3区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1177/15344843241258522

Luisa Reyes, María-Rita Blanco, M. Pinillos

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the unpredictability and complexity of the business environment -due to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and augmented by the COVID-19 pandemic-, employees are required to continually learn new skills and ways of working. Even though 20 years have passed since the coining of the learning agility (LA) construct, only one literature review has explored it qualitatively. Through a co-word bibliometric analysis, complemented by a content analysis, this paper aims to identify the intellectual structure of the LA. Results show that the scientific production by research areas, journals, and studies that have contributed most to the field. Career variety was found as a central and underdeveloped theme while Talent Management was identified as potential emergent one. The important themes for structuring the field on LA were mostly examined from an individual level, as a process or as an outcome. Future research within the Human Resource Development field is suggested.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学习敏捷性的过去、现在和未来：文献计量与内容分析

由于第四次工业革命和 COVID-19 大流行病的影响，商业环境变得不可预测且错综复杂，员工需要不断学习新的技能和工作方式。尽管学习敏捷性（LA）这一概念已经提出 20 年了，但只有一篇文献对其进行了定性探讨。本文旨在通过共词文献计量分析和内容分析，确定学习敏捷的知识结构。结果表明，对该领域贡献最大的研究领域、期刊和研究的科学成果。职业多样性被认为是一个核心但发展不足的主题，而人才管理被认为是一个潜在的新兴主题。关于构建职业发展领域的重要主题大多是从个人层面、作为过程或结果进行研究的。建议今后在人力资源开发领域开展研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Resource Development Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.