Professional Development in Reading Comprehension: A Meta‐analysis of the Effects on Teachers and Students

IF 3.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marianne Rice, Kacee Lambright, K. Wijekumar
{"title":"Professional Development in Reading Comprehension: A Meta‐analysis of the Effects on Teachers and Students","authors":"Marianne Rice, Kacee Lambright, K. Wijekumar","doi":"10.1002/rrq.546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading comprehension instruction was identified by the National Reading Panel as an effective instructional practice to improve students' reading comprehension. Teacher professional development (PD) is essential for effective reading comprehension instruction to occur in schools. The aim of this meta‐analysis is to examine the extent to which teacher PD in reading comprehension impacted teacher knowledge or practice outcomes and student reading comprehension outcomes. Additionally, we explored whether various studies or PD characteristics were potential moderators of these outcomes. We identified 29 experimental and quasi‐experimental studies, including 51 independent samples and 97 effect sizes. Using robust variance estimation, teacher PD in reading comprehension had a large effect (g = 0.947, p < .001) on teacher knowledge or practice and a small effect (g = 0.193, p < .001) on student reading comprehension. Results indicate teacher PD in reading comprehension is effective in improving teaching practices and student learning. However, more systematic research is needed to investigate effective PD components and other factors which may influence the impact of PD on teacher and student outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48160,"journal":{"name":"Reading Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading comprehension instruction was identified by the National Reading Panel as an effective instructional practice to improve students' reading comprehension. Teacher professional development (PD) is essential for effective reading comprehension instruction to occur in schools. The aim of this meta‐analysis is to examine the extent to which teacher PD in reading comprehension impacted teacher knowledge or practice outcomes and student reading comprehension outcomes. Additionally, we explored whether various studies or PD characteristics were potential moderators of these outcomes. We identified 29 experimental and quasi‐experimental studies, including 51 independent samples and 97 effect sizes. Using robust variance estimation, teacher PD in reading comprehension had a large effect (g = 0.947, p < .001) on teacher knowledge or practice and a small effect (g = 0.193, p < .001) on student reading comprehension. Results indicate teacher PD in reading comprehension is effective in improving teaching practices and student learning. However, more systematic research is needed to investigate effective PD components and other factors which may influence the impact of PD on teacher and student outcomes.
阅读理解方面的专业发展:对教师和学生影响的元分析
阅读理解教学被国家阅读小组确定为提高学生阅读理解能力的有效教学方法。教师专业发展(PD)对于学校开展有效的阅读理解教学至关重要。本荟萃分析旨在研究阅读理解方面的教师专业发展对教师知识或实践成果以及学生阅读理解成果的影响程度。此外,我们还探讨了各种研究或教师培训特征是否是这些结果的潜在调节因素。我们确定了 29 项实验和准实验研究,包括 51 个独立样本和 97 个效应大小。通过稳健方差估计,教师阅读理解能力培养对教师知识或实践的影响较大(g = 0.947,p < .001),而对学生阅读理解能力的影响较小(g = 0.193,p < .001)。研究结果表明,阅读理解方面的教师培训能有效改善教学实践和学生学习。然而,还需要进行更系统的研究,以调查阅读理解教学的有效组成部分,以及可能影响阅读理解教学对教师和学生成果影响的其他因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: For more than 40 years, Reading Research Quarterly has been essential reading for those committed to scholarship on literacy among learners of all ages. The leading research journal in the field, each issue of RRQ includes •Reports of important studies •Multidisciplinary research •Various modes of investigation •Diverse viewpoints on literacy practices, teaching, and learning
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信