Ethical Considerations in Co-Authoring Research with Music Therapy Stakeholders

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION
Kerry Devlin, Anthony Meadows, Morgan Johnston, Cheryl Johnston
{"title":"Ethical Considerations in Co-Authoring Research with Music Therapy Stakeholders","authors":"Kerry Devlin, Anthony Meadows, Morgan Johnston, Cheryl Johnston","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While stakeholders provide invaluable perspectives about music therapy, particularly through the lens of their expertise as participants in music therapy encounters, their perspectives are rarely amplified in the context of full participation in research teams. In support of stakeholder participation in music therapy research, this article introduces and explores ethical considerations related to co-authorship. These ethical considerations are approached in three ways: (1) describing how co-authorship has been undertaken with music therapy stakeholders, specifically disabled children and adults, in a range of contexts, (2) Identifying ethical considerations related to our team’s own research project (Devlin, K., Johnston, M., & Johnston, C. [2024]. Making mistakes together: therapy participant, parent, and therapist perspectives on music therapy in two different settings. Music Therapy Perspectives) with two coauthors who are also stakeholders, and (3) providing guidelines for music therapists interested in coauthoring research with stakeholders. In doing so, the importance of co-authorship as an accessible, equitable research practice is emphasized.\n Plain language abstract This article is about planning, doing, and writing research with people who are usually studied in music therapy research. We call this co-research. We talk about:\n How to keep people safe How to make decisions together How to work and write as a team If we should use our real names","PeriodicalId":44813,"journal":{"name":"Music Therapy Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Therapy Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miae009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While stakeholders provide invaluable perspectives about music therapy, particularly through the lens of their expertise as participants in music therapy encounters, their perspectives are rarely amplified in the context of full participation in research teams. In support of stakeholder participation in music therapy research, this article introduces and explores ethical considerations related to co-authorship. These ethical considerations are approached in three ways: (1) describing how co-authorship has been undertaken with music therapy stakeholders, specifically disabled children and adults, in a range of contexts, (2) Identifying ethical considerations related to our team’s own research project (Devlin, K., Johnston, M., & Johnston, C. [2024]. Making mistakes together: therapy participant, parent, and therapist perspectives on music therapy in two different settings. Music Therapy Perspectives) with two coauthors who are also stakeholders, and (3) providing guidelines for music therapists interested in coauthoring research with stakeholders. In doing so, the importance of co-authorship as an accessible, equitable research practice is emphasized. Plain language abstract This article is about planning, doing, and writing research with people who are usually studied in music therapy research. We call this co-research. We talk about: How to keep people safe How to make decisions together How to work and write as a team If we should use our real names
与音乐治疗利益相关者共同开展研究的伦理考虑因素
虽然利益相关者提供了有关音乐治疗的宝贵观点,特别是通过他们作为音乐治疗参与者的专业知识,但他们的观点很少在全面参与研究团队的背景下得到放大。为了支持利益相关者参与音乐治疗研究,本文介绍并探讨了与共同作者相关的伦理考虑因素。这些伦理考虑因素将从三个方面展开:(1) 描述如何与音乐治疗利益相关者(特别是残疾儿童和成人)在各种情况下共同撰写论文;(2) 确定与我们团队自身研究项目相关的伦理考虑因素(Devlin, K., Johnston, M., & Johnston, C. [2024].共同犯错:治疗参与者、家长和治疗师对两种不同环境下音乐治疗的看法。音乐治疗视角》)的两位共同作者也是利益相关者,(3)为有兴趣与利益相关者共同进行研究的音乐治疗师提供指导。在此过程中,强调了共同作者作为一种可获得的、公平的研究实践的重要性。通俗易懂的语言摘要 这篇文章是关于与通常在音乐治疗研究中被研究的人员一起规划、开展和撰写研究。我们称之为共同研究。我们将讨论如何保证人们的安全 如何共同决策 如何作为一个团队工作和写作 如果我们应该使用我们的真实姓名
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Music Therapy Perspectives
Music Therapy Perspectives REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信