School Counselors’ Hope, Stress, and Job Satisfaction

Jennifer K. Niles, Patrick R. Mullen, Emily Kitching, Kyle Schofield
{"title":"School Counselors’ Hope, Stress, and Job Satisfaction","authors":"Jennifer K. Niles, Patrick R. Mullen, Emily Kitching, Kyle Schofield","doi":"10.1177/2156759x241259487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Previous studies suggest hope may protect against stress and burnout. Hope has also been associated with higher levels of job satisfaction for individuals across professions. However, no research has yet explored the relationships among school counselors’ hope, stress, and job satisfaction. Method: We conducted a hierarchical regression with a sample of school counselors ( N = 450) to examine whether hope would predict school counselors’ job satisfaction, even in the presence of stress. We sought to examine the extent to which the subscales of hope (pathways and agency) predict school counselors’ reported job satisfaction and to what extent hope pathways and agency continue to predict school counselors’ reported job satisfaction when stress is added to the model. Results: Our findings indicated that hope predicted job satisfaction, suggesting that participants who reported overall hope were also more satisfied with their jobs. When we added stress to the model, the pathways subscale of hope remained a significant predictor of job satisfaction. Conclusions: These findings provide new insights into the usefulness of hope as it relates to school counselors’ job satisfaction and stress. We offer implications for practice, training, and future research.","PeriodicalId":74580,"journal":{"name":"Professional school counseling","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional school counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759x241259487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies suggest hope may protect against stress and burnout. Hope has also been associated with higher levels of job satisfaction for individuals across professions. However, no research has yet explored the relationships among school counselors’ hope, stress, and job satisfaction. Method: We conducted a hierarchical regression with a sample of school counselors ( N = 450) to examine whether hope would predict school counselors’ job satisfaction, even in the presence of stress. We sought to examine the extent to which the subscales of hope (pathways and agency) predict school counselors’ reported job satisfaction and to what extent hope pathways and agency continue to predict school counselors’ reported job satisfaction when stress is added to the model. Results: Our findings indicated that hope predicted job satisfaction, suggesting that participants who reported overall hope were also more satisfied with their jobs. When we added stress to the model, the pathways subscale of hope remained a significant predictor of job satisfaction. Conclusions: These findings provide new insights into the usefulness of hope as it relates to school counselors’ job satisfaction and stress. We offer implications for practice, training, and future research.
学校辅导员的希望、压力和工作满意度
目的以往的研究表明,希望可以防止压力和职业倦怠。希望还与不同职业的个人较高的工作满意度有关。然而,还没有研究探讨过学校辅导员的希望、压力和工作满意度之间的关系。研究方法我们对学校辅导员样本(N = 450)进行了分层回归,以考察即使在存在压力的情况下,希望能否预测学校辅导员的工作满意度。我们试图研究希望的子量表(路径和代理)在多大程度上可以预测学校辅导员报告的工作满意度,以及当压力被添加到模型中时,希望的路径和代理在多大程度上可以继续预测学校辅导员报告的工作满意度。结果:我们的研究结果表明,希望能够预测工作满意度,这表明那些报告了总体希望的参与者对他们的工作也更满意。当我们将压力添加到模型中时,希望的路径子量表仍能显著预测工作满意度。结论:这些研究结果为了解希望对学校辅导员工作满意度和压力的作用提供了新的视角。我们为实践、培训和未来研究提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信