Optionally green: The effect of hybrid product default policy on consumer response to hybrid products

Bryan Usrey, Charalampos Saridakis, A. Theotokis
{"title":"Optionally green: The effect of hybrid product default policy on consumer response to hybrid products","authors":"Bryan Usrey, Charalampos Saridakis, A. Theotokis","doi":"10.1002/mar.22052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today's marketplace, products can feature both “green” and “non‐green” attributes and consumers, with the press of a button, can select their preferred operating mode (green vs. nongreen). In this research, we define such products as hybrid, arguing that their choice architecture design—specifically, the default operational mode—plays a pivotal role in influencing consumer evaluation and purchase behavior. In four experiments, we found that consumers view a hybrid product as more environmentally friendly when the green mode is the default setting and can be turned off (opt‐out), rather than when the green mode must be activated (opt‐in). Specifically, we show that, when efficiency (vs. effectiveness)—related attributes are valued, the opt‐out (vs. opt‐in) default policy enhances purchase behavior. Moreover, we find that this effect is mediated by green attribute centrality, in that consumers perceive the opt‐out (vs. opt‐in) default policy as more central. Finally, we find that the effect of default policy is stronger for consumers with an analytical, as opposed to a holistic, thinking style. This article contributes to both default policy and hybrid product literature and provides managerial implications for the design and promotion of hybrid products.","PeriodicalId":188459,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today's marketplace, products can feature both “green” and “non‐green” attributes and consumers, with the press of a button, can select their preferred operating mode (green vs. nongreen). In this research, we define such products as hybrid, arguing that their choice architecture design—specifically, the default operational mode—plays a pivotal role in influencing consumer evaluation and purchase behavior. In four experiments, we found that consumers view a hybrid product as more environmentally friendly when the green mode is the default setting and can be turned off (opt‐out), rather than when the green mode must be activated (opt‐in). Specifically, we show that, when efficiency (vs. effectiveness)—related attributes are valued, the opt‐out (vs. opt‐in) default policy enhances purchase behavior. Moreover, we find that this effect is mediated by green attribute centrality, in that consumers perceive the opt‐out (vs. opt‐in) default policy as more central. Finally, we find that the effect of default policy is stronger for consumers with an analytical, as opposed to a holistic, thinking style. This article contributes to both default policy and hybrid product literature and provides managerial implications for the design and promotion of hybrid products.
可选择的绿色:混合产品默认政策对消费者对混合产品反应的影响
在当今的市场上,产品可以同时具有 "绿色 "和 "非绿色 "属性,消费者只需按下按钮,就可以选择自己喜欢的运行模式(绿色与非绿色)。在这项研究中,我们将这类产品定义为混合型产品,认为它们所选择的结构设计--特别是默认运行模式--在影响消费者的评价和购买行为方面起着举足轻重的作用。在四个实验中,我们发现,当绿色模式是默认设置且可以关闭(选择退出)时,消费者认为混合动力产品更环保,而不是必须激活绿色模式(选择进入)时。具体来说,我们表明,当效率(与效果)相关属性受到重视时,选择退出(与选择进入)默认政策会增强购买行为。此外,我们还发现这种效应受绿色属性中心性的影响,即消费者认为 "退出"(与 "选择进入 "相比)默认政策更具中心性。最后,我们发现默认政策对具有分析性思维风格(而非整体性思维风格)的消费者的影响更大。本文对默认政策和混合产品文献都有贡献,并为混合产品的设计和推广提供了管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信