Household water insecurity experience in the Upper West Region of Ghana: Insights for effective water resource management

Cornelius K. A. Pienaah, Sulemana Ansumah Saaka, E. Batung, Kamaldeen Mohammed, Isaac Luginaah
{"title":"Household water insecurity experience in the Upper West Region of Ghana: Insights for effective water resource management","authors":"Cornelius K. A. Pienaah, Sulemana Ansumah Saaka, E. Batung, Kamaldeen Mohammed, Isaac Luginaah","doi":"10.1371/journal.pwat.0000216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global community is not on track to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) by 2030. Many low- and middle-income countries like Ghana still struggle with water insecurity. In semi-arid regions like Ghana’s Upper West, climate change has worsened water insecurity, leading to health and livelihood consequences. In UWR, limited studies have explored water insecurity in rural areas. This study fills a knowledge gap by investigating the determinants of water insecurity in Ghana’s Upper West Region (UWR) from a political ecology of health (PEH) perspective. It comprehensively explores the interplay of social, economic, political, environmental, and health-related factors contributing to water insecurity in the UWR. The results from binary logistic regression show that households in the wealthier category (OR = 0.475, p<0.05) and those that spent less than thirty minutes on a roundtrip to fetch water (OR = 0.474, p<0.01) were less likely to experience water insecurity. On the other hand, households that did not use rainwater harvesting methods (OR = 2.117, p<0.01), had to travel over a kilometer to access water (OR = 3.249, p<0.01), had inadequate water storage systems (OR = 2.290, p<0.001), did not treat their water (OR = 2.601, p<0.001), were exposed to water-induced infections (OR = 3.473, p<0.001), did not receive any water, hygiene, and sanitation education (OR = 2.575, p<0.01), and faced water scarcity during the dry season (OR = 2.340, p<0.001) were at a higher risk of experiencing water insecurity. To mitigate the risks of water insecurity and adverse health impacts, policymakers and practitioners must work together to educate households on effective water conservation, storage, and treatment techniques. It is recommended that households harvest rainwater as a coping strategy, construct appropriate storage systems, and treat their water. Communal self-help water investments should be encouraged and supported. Given the significant aquifers and semi-arid landscape of the UWR, investing in groundwater development should be a top priority.","PeriodicalId":93672,"journal":{"name":"PLOS water","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global community is not on track to achieve Sustainable Development Goal 6 (SDG 6) by 2030. Many low- and middle-income countries like Ghana still struggle with water insecurity. In semi-arid regions like Ghana’s Upper West, climate change has worsened water insecurity, leading to health and livelihood consequences. In UWR, limited studies have explored water insecurity in rural areas. This study fills a knowledge gap by investigating the determinants of water insecurity in Ghana’s Upper West Region (UWR) from a political ecology of health (PEH) perspective. It comprehensively explores the interplay of social, economic, political, environmental, and health-related factors contributing to water insecurity in the UWR. The results from binary logistic regression show that households in the wealthier category (OR = 0.475, p<0.05) and those that spent less than thirty minutes on a roundtrip to fetch water (OR = 0.474, p<0.01) were less likely to experience water insecurity. On the other hand, households that did not use rainwater harvesting methods (OR = 2.117, p<0.01), had to travel over a kilometer to access water (OR = 3.249, p<0.01), had inadequate water storage systems (OR = 2.290, p<0.001), did not treat their water (OR = 2.601, p<0.001), were exposed to water-induced infections (OR = 3.473, p<0.001), did not receive any water, hygiene, and sanitation education (OR = 2.575, p<0.01), and faced water scarcity during the dry season (OR = 2.340, p<0.001) were at a higher risk of experiencing water insecurity. To mitigate the risks of water insecurity and adverse health impacts, policymakers and practitioners must work together to educate households on effective water conservation, storage, and treatment techniques. It is recommended that households harvest rainwater as a coping strategy, construct appropriate storage systems, and treat their water. Communal self-help water investments should be encouraged and supported. Given the significant aquifers and semi-arid landscape of the UWR, investing in groundwater development should be a top priority.
加纳上西部地区家庭用水不安全的经验:对有效水资源管理的启示
全球社会尚未走上到 2030 年实现可持续发展目标 6(SDG 6)的正轨。许多像加纳这样的中低收入国家仍在与水资源不安全作斗争。在加纳上西部等半干旱地区,气候变化加剧了水资源不安全状况,导致健康和生计受到影响。在加纳上西部,对农村地区水资源不安全问题的研究十分有限。本研究从健康政治生态学(PEH)的角度调查了加纳上西部地区(UWR)水资源不安全的决定因素,填补了这一知识空白。该研究全面探讨了导致加纳上西区水资源不安全的社会、经济、政治、环境和健康相关因素之间的相互作用。二元逻辑回归的结果显示,较富裕家庭(OR = 0.475,P<0.05)和往返取水时间少于 30 分钟的家庭(OR = 0.474,P<0.01)经历用水不安全的可能性较小。另一方面,不使用雨水收集方法(OR = 2.117,p<0.01)、取水路程超过一公里(OR = 3.249,p<0.01)、储水系统不足(OR = 2.290,p<0.001)、不对水进行处理(OR = 2.601,p<0.001)、受到水引起的感染(OR = 3.473,p<0.001)、没有接受过任何水、个人卫生和环境卫生教育(OR = 2.575,p<0.01)以及在旱季面临缺水(OR = 2.340,p<0.001)的人遭遇水不安全的风险更高。为了降低用水不安全的风险和对健康的不利影响,政策制定者和从业人员必须共同努力,教育家庭掌握有效的节水、储水和水处理技术。建议家庭将收集雨水作为一种应对策略,建造适当的储水系统,并对水进行处理。应鼓励和支持社区自助供水投资。鉴于西印度洋河谷地区拥有大量含水层和半干旱地貌,投资开发地下水应成为重中之重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信