Assessing ecological effects of storm surges on Arctic bird populations in the outer Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
F. N. A. Shipman, T. Lantz, L. Blight
{"title":"Assessing ecological effects of storm surges on Arctic bird populations in the outer Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories","authors":"F. N. A. Shipman, T. Lantz, L. Blight","doi":"10.1139/as-2023-0064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coastal areas in the Western Canadian Arctic are predicted to experience increases in the frequency and intensity of storm surges as rapid climate change continues. Although storm surges have the potential to cause widespread and persistent vegetation loss, little information is available about the influence of decreasing disturbance intervals (between storms), expected timelines of recovery for vegetation, and how vegetation change alters habitat availability and/or quality for local wildlife populations. We investigated how Arctic bird diversity is affected by heterogeneous vegetation recovery post-storm. We employed field survey protocols from the Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM) to investigate how avian community assemblage was affected by heterogeneous re-vegetation 20 years following a record 1999 storm surge. Comparisons of this bird survey data with vegetation and habitat factors showed that the drier, post-storm vegetation barrens were preferred by ground-nesters and species that use open habitats such as Lapland longspur (Calcarius lapponicus) and semipalmated plover (Charadrius semipalmatus), whereas the wetter (usually with surface water) revegetated habitats were frequented by species of ducks (Anasspp.), red-necked phalarope (Phalaropus lobatus), and savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). Overall, this research shows that areas that have revegetated after the 1999 storm can be considered as functionally recovered in comparison to our Reference (i.e., unaffected) sites in terms of vegetation and bird communities, but that areas still exist ~20 years post-storm that do not show evidence of recovery","PeriodicalId":48575,"journal":{"name":"Arctic Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2023-0064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal areas in the Western Canadian Arctic are predicted to experience increases in the frequency and intensity of storm surges as rapid climate change continues. Although storm surges have the potential to cause widespread and persistent vegetation loss, little information is available about the influence of decreasing disturbance intervals (between storms), expected timelines of recovery for vegetation, and how vegetation change alters habitat availability and/or quality for local wildlife populations. We investigated how Arctic bird diversity is affected by heterogeneous vegetation recovery post-storm. We employed field survey protocols from the Program for Regional and International Shorebird Monitoring (PRISM) to investigate how avian community assemblage was affected by heterogeneous re-vegetation 20 years following a record 1999 storm surge. Comparisons of this bird survey data with vegetation and habitat factors showed that the drier, post-storm vegetation barrens were preferred by ground-nesters and species that use open habitats such as Lapland longspur (Calcarius lapponicus) and semipalmated plover (Charadrius semipalmatus), whereas the wetter (usually with surface water) revegetated habitats were frequented by species of ducks (Anasspp.), red-necked phalarope (Phalaropus lobatus), and savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis). Overall, this research shows that areas that have revegetated after the 1999 storm can be considered as functionally recovered in comparison to our Reference (i.e., unaffected) sites in terms of vegetation and bird communities, but that areas still exist ~20 years post-storm that do not show evidence of recovery
评估风暴潮对西北地区外麦肯齐三角洲北极鸟类种群的生态影响
据预测,随着气候变化的迅速发展,加拿大西部北极地区沿海地区的风暴潮频率和强度都将增加。尽管风暴潮有可能造成大范围、持续性的植被损失,但有关干扰间隔(风暴之间)减少的影响、植被恢复的预期时间表以及植被变化如何改变当地野生动物栖息地的可用性和/或质量等方面的信息却很少。我们研究了北极鸟类多样性如何受到暴风雨后异质性植被恢复的影响。我们采用了区域和国际岸鸟监测计划(PRISM)的实地调查方案,调查了在 1999 年创纪录的风暴潮发生 20 年后,鸟类群落组合如何受到异质植被恢复的影响。将这些鸟类调查数据与植被和栖息地因素进行比较后发现,较干燥的风暴后植被荒地是地栖鸟类和使用开阔栖息地的物种的首选,如拉普兰长脚鹬(Calcarius lapponicus)和半掌鸻(Charadrius semipalmatus),而较潮湿(通常有地表水)的植被重建栖息地则是野鸭(Anasspp.)、红颈蹼鹬(Phalaropus lobatus)和草原麻雀(Passerculus sandwichensis)等物种经常光顾。总之,这项研究表明,与我们的参照地(即未受影响的地点)相比,1999 年暴风雨后重新植被的地区在植被和鸟类群落方面可视为功能恢复,但暴风雨后约 20 年仍有一些地区没有显示出恢复的迹象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arctic Science
Arctic Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Arctic Science is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes original peer-reviewed research from all areas of natural science and applied science & engineering related to northern Polar Regions. The focus on basic and applied science includes the traditional knowledge and observations of the indigenous peoples of the region as well as cutting-edge developments in biological, chemical, physical and engineering science in all northern environments. Reports on interdisciplinary research are encouraged. Special issues and sections dealing with important issues in northern polar science are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信