Scoping literature review of well‐being of students at school: Implications for designing evidence‐based interventions

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Strukova Alexandra
{"title":"Scoping literature review of well‐being of students at school: Implications for designing evidence‐based interventions","authors":"Strukova Alexandra","doi":"10.1002/rev3.3479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the literature to clarify the image of a student with a high level of well‐being (WB) for a future systematic literature review and evidence‐based interventions to promote student WB. It presents a holistic approach to the analysis of definitions, operationalisation and indicators with interpretative phenomenological analyses (IPA). The main question of the paper is what image of student WB can be constructed from the components and indicators of WB that have been highlighted in the literature. Overall, 50 publications were coded before the subjectively evaluated saturation was reached and 641 mentions of the different components of WB were coded that were distributed among seven categories: ‘individual psychological indicators’ (319 units), ‘social contacts, relationships’ (136 units), ‘health’ (78 units), ‘school life’ (63 units), ‘standard of living’ (26 units), ‘spirituality, moral competence, values’ (12 units) and ‘general mentions’ of WB (7 units). It is argued that individual psychological state, quality of relationships, health, school‐related features, objective indicators, and moral and spiritual aspects are features of students with a high level of WB. The implications for further research, practical usage and the limitations of the study are offered in the Discussion section.Developing high levels of student WB is an important aim of schools, but for it to be something more than just a declaration, some measures should be taken. To be effective, such measures should be based on scientific knowledge. This paper reviews the literature for future practical application.The research field of WB is diverse. Mostly, for evidence‐based measures, one specific approach to WB is used. This paper argues that it is important to look holistically at all theories of WB as they present different facets of one holistic construct.This paper will be useful for practitioners and policy makers as it provides both a scientific section where data, methods and results are presented, and an interpretation of the information for practical usage. It provides a wide range of data and covers several theories of WB and the operationalisation of WB and shows from which indexes these theories and operationalisations originate and why.","PeriodicalId":45076,"journal":{"name":"Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reviews the literature to clarify the image of a student with a high level of well‐being (WB) for a future systematic literature review and evidence‐based interventions to promote student WB. It presents a holistic approach to the analysis of definitions, operationalisation and indicators with interpretative phenomenological analyses (IPA). The main question of the paper is what image of student WB can be constructed from the components and indicators of WB that have been highlighted in the literature. Overall, 50 publications were coded before the subjectively evaluated saturation was reached and 641 mentions of the different components of WB were coded that were distributed among seven categories: ‘individual psychological indicators’ (319 units), ‘social contacts, relationships’ (136 units), ‘health’ (78 units), ‘school life’ (63 units), ‘standard of living’ (26 units), ‘spirituality, moral competence, values’ (12 units) and ‘general mentions’ of WB (7 units). It is argued that individual psychological state, quality of relationships, health, school‐related features, objective indicators, and moral and spiritual aspects are features of students with a high level of WB. The implications for further research, practical usage and the limitations of the study are offered in the Discussion section.Developing high levels of student WB is an important aim of schools, but for it to be something more than just a declaration, some measures should be taken. To be effective, such measures should be based on scientific knowledge. This paper reviews the literature for future practical application.The research field of WB is diverse. Mostly, for evidence‐based measures, one specific approach to WB is used. This paper argues that it is important to look holistically at all theories of WB as they present different facets of one holistic construct.This paper will be useful for practitioners and policy makers as it provides both a scientific section where data, methods and results are presented, and an interpretation of the information for practical usage. It provides a wide range of data and covers several theories of WB and the operationalisation of WB and shows from which indexes these theories and operationalisations originate and why.
关于在校学生福祉的范围界定文献综述:设计循证干预措施的意义
本文回顾了相关文献,以澄清高幸福感(WB)学生的形象,为今后的系统性文献回顾和循证干预措施提供依据,从而促进学生的幸福感。本文采用解释现象学分析法(IPA)对定义、操作化和指标进行了整体分析。本文的主要问题是,从文献中强调的学生减负的组成部分和指标中,可以构建出什么样的学生减负形象。在达到主观评价的饱和度之前,共对 50 篇出版物进行了编码,并对 641 次提及 WB 不同组成部分的内容进行了编码,这些内容分布在七个类别中:"个人心理指标"(319 个单元)、"社会交往、人际关系"(136 个单元)、"健康"(78 个单元)、"学校生活"(63 个单元)、"生活水平"(26 个单元)、"精神、道德能力、价值观"(12 个单元)和 "一般提及 "WB(7 个单元)。研究认为,个人心理状态、人际关系质量、健康状况、与学校相关的特征、客观指标以及道德和精神方面是具有高水平 WB 的学生的特征。讨论部分提出了进一步研究的意义、实际应用以及研究的局限性。要使这些措施行之有效,必须以科学知识为基础。本文对相关文献进行了综述,以利于今后的实际应用。关于以证据为基础的措施,大多采用一种特定的世行方法。本文认为,重要的是要从整体上看待所有关于福利预算的理论,因为它们提出了一个整体结构的不同方面。本文将对从业人员和政策制定者有用,因为它既提供了一个科学部分,其中介绍了数据、方法和结果,也提供了对信息的解释,以便实际使用。本文提供了广泛的数据,涵盖了多种工薪阶层理论和工薪阶层的操作方法,并说明了这些理论和操作方法源自哪些指标以及原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of Education
Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信