Beta diversity of plant–herbivore interactions is unaffected by urbanization levels in Brazilian Cerrado

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Walter Santos de Araújo, Luana Teixeira Silveira, Matheus de Morais Belchior Couto, Luiz Alberto Dolabela Falcão, Marcilio Fagundes, Frederico Siqueira de Neves
{"title":"Beta diversity of plant–herbivore interactions is unaffected by urbanization levels in Brazilian Cerrado","authors":"Walter Santos de Araújo,&nbsp;Luana Teixeira Silveira,&nbsp;Matheus de Morais Belchior Couto,&nbsp;Luiz Alberto Dolabela Falcão,&nbsp;Marcilio Fagundes,&nbsp;Frederico Siqueira de Neves","doi":"10.1007/s11829-024-10079-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plant–herbivore interactions are pivotal in shaping terrestrial ecosystems, influencing plant populations and insect diversity; however, little is known about how anthropogenic impacts affect the beta diversity of these interactions. In our study, we investigated plant–herbivore networks across an urbanization gradient in Brazilian Cerrado. We tested two hypotheses: (1) urbanization decreases interaction dissimilarity, and (2) herbivorous insects show greater dissimilarity than plants. To test these hypotheses, we conducted data collection across 16 sites, representing different urbanization levels—urban, rural, and wild. We sampled plant–herbivore interactions for 310 insect herbivore species and 97 host plant species. Our analysis revealed that beta diversity of interactions was consistently high across all environments studied. However, we did not find any significant differences in total interaction dissimilarity among the different levels of urbanization. We found that the primary driver of dissimilarity was species composition turnover, with herbivorous insects contributing more to dissimilarity. Our findings challenge the conventional wisdom that urbanization significantly alters plant–herbivore interactions. Instead, we observed consistent interaction dissimilarity, highlighting the resilience of ecological networks in the face of anthropogenic impacts. Our results underscore the complexity of these interactions and emphasize that plant–herbivore interactions can exhibit a high degree of dissimilarity even in urban environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"18 5","pages":"881 - 889"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-024-10079-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant–herbivore interactions are pivotal in shaping terrestrial ecosystems, influencing plant populations and insect diversity; however, little is known about how anthropogenic impacts affect the beta diversity of these interactions. In our study, we investigated plant–herbivore networks across an urbanization gradient in Brazilian Cerrado. We tested two hypotheses: (1) urbanization decreases interaction dissimilarity, and (2) herbivorous insects show greater dissimilarity than plants. To test these hypotheses, we conducted data collection across 16 sites, representing different urbanization levels—urban, rural, and wild. We sampled plant–herbivore interactions for 310 insect herbivore species and 97 host plant species. Our analysis revealed that beta diversity of interactions was consistently high across all environments studied. However, we did not find any significant differences in total interaction dissimilarity among the different levels of urbanization. We found that the primary driver of dissimilarity was species composition turnover, with herbivorous insects contributing more to dissimilarity. Our findings challenge the conventional wisdom that urbanization significantly alters plant–herbivore interactions. Instead, we observed consistent interaction dissimilarity, highlighting the resilience of ecological networks in the face of anthropogenic impacts. Our results underscore the complexity of these interactions and emphasize that plant–herbivore interactions can exhibit a high degree of dissimilarity even in urban environments.

Abstract Image

巴西塞拉多地区植物与食草动物相互作用的 Beta 多样性不受城市化水平的影响
植物与食草动物之间的相互作用在塑造陆地生态系统方面起着关键作用,影响着植物种群和昆虫多样性;然而,人们对人为影响如何影响这些相互作用的贝塔多样性知之甚少。在我们的研究中,我们调查了巴西塞拉多地区城市化梯度上的植物-食草动物网络。我们检验了两个假设:(1)城市化降低了相互作用的差异性;(2)食草昆虫比植物表现出更大的差异性。为了验证这些假设,我们在代表不同城市化水平的 16 个地点--城市、农村和野外--进行了数据收集。我们采集了 310 种食草昆虫和 97 种寄主植物的植物-食草昆虫相互作用样本。我们的分析表明,在所研究的所有环境中,相互作用的贝塔多样性一直很高。然而,我们并没有发现不同城市化水平之间的总交互异质性有任何显著差异。我们发现,差异的主要驱动因素是物种组成的更替,其中草食性昆虫对差异的贡献更大。我们的研究结果对城市化会显著改变植物与食草动物之间相互作用的传统观点提出了质疑。相反,我们观察到了一致的交互异质性,凸显了生态网络在人类活动影响下的恢复力。我们的研究结果凸显了这些相互作用的复杂性,并强调即使在城市环境中,植物与食草动物之间的相互作用也会表现出高度的差异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信