Curbing the Opioid Crisis: Optimal Dynamic Policies for Preventive and Mitigating Interventions

IF 2.5 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Sina Ansari, S. Enayati, Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei, Julie M. Kapp
{"title":"Curbing the Opioid Crisis: Optimal Dynamic Policies for Preventive and Mitigating Interventions","authors":"Sina Ansari, S. Enayati, Raha Akhavan-Tabatabaei, Julie M. Kapp","doi":"10.1287/deca.2023.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem statement: This paper addresses the challenge of effectively responding to the opioid epidemic stemming from prescription pills through a public health lens. It centers on the strategic distribution of resources across diverse interventions aimed at preventing and mitigating the consequences of opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose occurrences. Methodology: This paper proposes a decision aid tool built on the expected utility theory that leverages a Susceptible-Infected-Removed compartmental model to simulate the dynamics of the epidemic in a population. This model then feeds into a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model to generate optimal policies upon the current state of the epidemic. The optimal policies allocate the intervention budget to primary preventive and mitigating interventions in each decision period by minimizing the cost of fatal overdoses relative to the population’s number of individuals with OUD, considering the impact magnitude of each intervention, based on the current state of the epidemic. A 10-year simulation of the epidemic’s progression is conducted to assess the dynamic efficacy of the proposed decision tool. Results: The findings reveal an average reduction of 29% in total costs compared to the scenario without interventions and a decrease of 12% in total costs on average compared to the scenario with a 50-50 allocation. The extensive sensitivity analysis of key parameters validates the decision aid tool. We observe that it is optimal to allocate a significant portion of the budget to prevention when the rate of opioid pill acquisition rises. Even with a heightened rate of fatal overdoses, it remains optimal to mostly invest in preventive interventions, as long as fatal overdose rates are lower than opioid access rates. Practical implications: This study provides practitioners with a tool to effectively address the opioid epidemic and enhance public health by deciding how to allocate their budget to various levels of intervention.","PeriodicalId":46460,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2023.0084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem statement: This paper addresses the challenge of effectively responding to the opioid epidemic stemming from prescription pills through a public health lens. It centers on the strategic distribution of resources across diverse interventions aimed at preventing and mitigating the consequences of opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose occurrences. Methodology: This paper proposes a decision aid tool built on the expected utility theory that leverages a Susceptible-Infected-Removed compartmental model to simulate the dynamics of the epidemic in a population. This model then feeds into a Markov Decision Process (MDP) model to generate optimal policies upon the current state of the epidemic. The optimal policies allocate the intervention budget to primary preventive and mitigating interventions in each decision period by minimizing the cost of fatal overdoses relative to the population’s number of individuals with OUD, considering the impact magnitude of each intervention, based on the current state of the epidemic. A 10-year simulation of the epidemic’s progression is conducted to assess the dynamic efficacy of the proposed decision tool. Results: The findings reveal an average reduction of 29% in total costs compared to the scenario without interventions and a decrease of 12% in total costs on average compared to the scenario with a 50-50 allocation. The extensive sensitivity analysis of key parameters validates the decision aid tool. We observe that it is optimal to allocate a significant portion of the budget to prevention when the rate of opioid pill acquisition rises. Even with a heightened rate of fatal overdoses, it remains optimal to mostly invest in preventive interventions, as long as fatal overdose rates are lower than opioid access rates. Practical implications: This study provides practitioners with a tool to effectively address the opioid epidemic and enhance public health by deciding how to allocate their budget to various levels of intervention.
遏制阿片类药物危机:预防和缓解干预的最佳动态政策
问题陈述:本文从公共卫生角度探讨了有效应对由处方药引发的阿片类药物流行所面临的挑战。其核心是在旨在预防和减轻阿片类药物使用障碍 (OUD) 和用药过量后果的各种干预措施中战略性地分配资源。方法:本文提出了一种基于期望效用理论的辅助决策工具,该工具利用 "易感者-感染者-移除者 "分区模型模拟人群中的流行病动态。然后将该模型输入马尔可夫决策过程(Markov Decision Process,MDP)模型,根据疫情现状生成最优政策。根据疫情现状,考虑到每种干预措施的影响程度,最优政策将干预预算分配给每个决策期的主要预防和缓解干预措施,最大限度地降低相对于人口中 OUD 患者数量的致命过量用药成本。对疫情的发展进行了为期 10 年的模拟,以评估所提议的决策工具的动态功效。结果:研究结果表明,与不采取干预措施的方案相比,总成本平均降低了 29%,与 50-50 分配方案相比,总成本平均降低了 12%。对关键参数进行的大量敏感性分析验证了决策辅助工具的有效性。我们发现,当阿片类药物的服用率上升时,将预算的很大一部分用于预防是最佳选择。即使致命药物过量率上升,只要致命药物过量率低于阿片类药物获取率,将大部分投资用于预防性干预措施仍然是最佳选择。实际意义:这项研究为从业人员提供了一种工具,通过决定如何将预算分配给不同级别的干预措施,有效应对阿片类药物的流行并提高公众健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Decision Analysis
Decision Analysis MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信