Jennifer Ninci, Mandy Rispoli, Stephanie Gerow, Emily Gregori
{"title":"Use of Preferred Stimuli as Receptive Identification Targets for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder","authors":"Jennifer Ninci, Mandy Rispoli, Stephanie Gerow, Emily Gregori","doi":"10.1007/s41252-024-00406-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in addition to core deficits in social communication, tend to devote attention to a restricted range of environmental events. Embedded interest interventions are used to establish one’s motivation to participate in low-preferred or neutral activities. We designed this single-case research study to evaluate the use of interests as receptive identification targets for children with ASD in the context of an intervention with added components as needed.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We compared the use of high- versus low-preferred receptive identification targets on receptive identification acquisition, stimulus generalization, and generalization to labels. We also evaluated ancillary variables (i.e., eye gaze, response attempts, and challenging behaviors) to examine if embedding interests acted to establish motivation for task engagement. An adapted alternating treatment design was used with changing conditions and reversal design.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Two children acquired more high-preferred receptive identification targets in fewer trials overall compared to low-preferred targets, one of whom only showed marginal improvements in the HP condition relative to the LP condition. A third participant had no improvements in either condition. All participants demonstrated increased engagement in the high-preferred condition relative to the low-preferred condition. Participants who mastered targets showed some improvements in generalization probes, primarily for HP targets.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Practitioners may consider beginning with high-preferred targets in receptive identification programs for children with ASD, but side effects should be monitored in tandem with acquisition outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36163,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":"9 1","pages":"140 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41252-024-00406-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), in addition to core deficits in social communication, tend to devote attention to a restricted range of environmental events. Embedded interest interventions are used to establish one’s motivation to participate in low-preferred or neutral activities. We designed this single-case research study to evaluate the use of interests as receptive identification targets for children with ASD in the context of an intervention with added components as needed.
Methods
We compared the use of high- versus low-preferred receptive identification targets on receptive identification acquisition, stimulus generalization, and generalization to labels. We also evaluated ancillary variables (i.e., eye gaze, response attempts, and challenging behaviors) to examine if embedding interests acted to establish motivation for task engagement. An adapted alternating treatment design was used with changing conditions and reversal design.
Results
Two children acquired more high-preferred receptive identification targets in fewer trials overall compared to low-preferred targets, one of whom only showed marginal improvements in the HP condition relative to the LP condition. A third participant had no improvements in either condition. All participants demonstrated increased engagement in the high-preferred condition relative to the low-preferred condition. Participants who mastered targets showed some improvements in generalization probes, primarily for HP targets.
Conclusions
Practitioners may consider beginning with high-preferred targets in receptive identification programs for children with ASD, but side effects should be monitored in tandem with acquisition outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders publishes high-quality research in the broad area of neurodevelopmental disorders across the lifespan. Study participants may include individuals with:Intellectual and developmental disabilitiesGlobal developmental delayCommunication disordersLanguage disordersSpeech sound disordersChildhood-onset fluency disorders (e.g., stuttering)Social (e.g., pragmatic) communication disordersUnspecified communication disordersAutism spectrum disorder (ASD)Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), specified and unspecifiedSpecific learning disordersMotor disordersDevelopmental coordination disordersStereotypic movement disorderTic disorders, specified and unspecifiedOther neurodevelopmental disorders, specified and unspecifiedPapers may also include studies of participants with neurodegenerative disorders that lead to a decline in intellectual functioning, including Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, corticobasal degeneration, Huntington’s disease, and progressive supranuclear palsy. The journal includes empirical, theoretical and review papers on a large variety of issues, populations, and domains, including but not limited to: diagnosis; incidence and prevalence; and educational, pharmacological, behavioral and cognitive behavioral, mindfulness, and psychosocial interventions across the life span. Animal models of basic research that inform the understanding and treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders are also welcomed. The journal is multidisciplinary and multi-theoretical, and encourages research from multiple specialties in the social sciences using quantitative and mixed-method research methodologies.