In vitro Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Chairside CAD/CAM Block Materials for Fabricating Dental Restorations

IF 0.8 Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
S. Sultan, Mazen Anwar Abdullah Albadi, Faris Salah Alhassan, Sherif Elsharkawy
{"title":"In vitro Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity of Chairside CAD/CAM Block Materials for Fabricating Dental Restorations","authors":"S. Sultan, Mazen Anwar Abdullah Albadi, Faris Salah Alhassan, Sherif Elsharkawy","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_334_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n The increasing utilization of chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) block materials in dentistry necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of their cytotoxicity to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to assess the cytotoxic effects of commonly used chairside CAD/CAM block materials for fabricating dental restorations.\n \n \n \n Several chairside CAD/CAM block materials including zirconia, lithium disilicate, and resin-based composites were evaluated for cytotoxicity using an in vitro model. Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and exposed to extracts from each material. Cytotoxicity was assessed using MTT assay after 24, 48, and 72 hours of exposure. Additionally, cell morphology and viability were examined using microscopy.\n \n \n \n The MTT assay revealed varying degrees of cytotoxicity among the tested materials. Zirconia demonstrated the least cytotoxicity with cell viability of 85% ± 5%, 82% ± 4%, and 79% ± 6% at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. Lithium disilicate exhibited moderate cytotoxicity with cell viability of 70% ± 6%, 65% ± 7%, and 60% ± 5% at the corresponding time points. Resin-based composites displayed the highest cytotoxicity with cell viability of 55% ± 8%, 45% ± 6%, and 40% ± 4% at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. Microscopic examination revealed altered cell morphology and reduced cell viability in the presence of resin-based composites.\n \n \n \n Chairside CAD/CAM block materials exhibit varying degrees of cytotoxicity, with zirconia demonstrating the least and resin-based composites showing the highest cytotoxic effects. These findings underscore the importance of considering cytotoxicity profiles when selecting CAD/CAM materials for dental restorations to ensure patient safety and biocompatibility.\n","PeriodicalId":16824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_334_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increasing utilization of chairside computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) block materials in dentistry necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of their cytotoxicity to ensure patient safety. This study aimed to assess the cytotoxic effects of commonly used chairside CAD/CAM block materials for fabricating dental restorations. Several chairside CAD/CAM block materials including zirconia, lithium disilicate, and resin-based composites were evaluated for cytotoxicity using an in vitro model. Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and exposed to extracts from each material. Cytotoxicity was assessed using MTT assay after 24, 48, and 72 hours of exposure. Additionally, cell morphology and viability were examined using microscopy. The MTT assay revealed varying degrees of cytotoxicity among the tested materials. Zirconia demonstrated the least cytotoxicity with cell viability of 85% ± 5%, 82% ± 4%, and 79% ± 6% at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. Lithium disilicate exhibited moderate cytotoxicity with cell viability of 70% ± 6%, 65% ± 7%, and 60% ± 5% at the corresponding time points. Resin-based composites displayed the highest cytotoxicity with cell viability of 55% ± 8%, 45% ± 6%, and 40% ± 4% at 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. Microscopic examination revealed altered cell morphology and reduced cell viability in the presence of resin-based composites. Chairside CAD/CAM block materials exhibit varying degrees of cytotoxicity, with zirconia demonstrating the least and resin-based composites showing the highest cytotoxic effects. These findings underscore the importance of considering cytotoxicity profiles when selecting CAD/CAM materials for dental restorations to ensure patient safety and biocompatibility.
用于制作牙科修复体的椅旁 CAD/CAM 块状材料的细胞毒性体外评估
摘要 牙科中越来越多地使用椅旁计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)块状材料,因此有必要对其细胞毒性进行全面评估,以确保患者安全。本研究旨在评估用于制作牙科修复体的常用椅旁 CAD/CAM 块状材料的细胞毒性效应。 采用体外模型对包括氧化锆、二硅酸锂和树脂基复合材料在内的几种椅旁 CAD/CAM 块状材料进行了细胞毒性评估。培养人牙龈成纤维细胞并使其接触每种材料的提取物。暴露 24、48 和 72 小时后,使用 MTT 法评估细胞毒性。此外,还使用显微镜检查了细胞形态和活力。 MTT 试验显示,受试材料具有不同程度的细胞毒性。氧化锆的细胞毒性最小,在 24、48 和 72 小时内细胞存活率分别为 85%±5%、82%±4% 和 79%±6% 。二硅酸锂显示出中等程度的细胞毒性,在相应的时间点,细胞存活率分别为 70% ± 6%、65% ± 7% 和 60% ± 5%。树脂基复合材料的细胞毒性最高,在 24、48 和 72 小时内,细胞存活率分别为 55%±8%、45%±6% 和 40%±4% 。显微镜检查显示,在树脂基复合材料的作用下,细胞形态发生改变,细胞存活率降低。 椅旁 CAD/CAM 块体材料表现出不同程度的细胞毒性,氧化锆的细胞毒性最小,而树脂基复合材料的细胞毒性最高。这些发现强调了在选择用于牙科修复的 CAD/CAM 材料时考虑细胞毒性特征以确保患者安全和生物相容性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
275
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is a Quarterly multidisciplinary open access biomedical journal. Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences is an international medium of interaction between scientist, academicians and industrial personnel’s.JPBS is now offial publication of OPUBS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信