Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) to optimize the satellite‐derived discharge rating curves

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
A. Rai, Vikas Kumar, Sharad Patel, Zafar Beg, Kumar Gaurav
{"title":"Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) to optimize the satellite‐derived discharge rating curves","authors":"A. Rai, Vikas Kumar, Sharad Patel, Zafar Beg, Kumar Gaurav","doi":"10.1002/rra.4325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimate river discharge by utilizing limited in‐situ and multi‐satellite data through Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) optimization method (). We establish the BRMA by analyzing the functional relationships (H, W, H.W vs. Q) at four distinct locations along the Ganga (Shahzadpur and Azmabad) and the Narmada (Hoshangabad and Mandleshwer) rivers. To measure the channel width (W) we have used the Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images (2006–2019). We use the water level (H) data from satellite altimeter (Jason 2, Jason 3, Envisat, and Sentinel 3A). We have used BRMA to establish functional relationships between channel width (W), water level (H), and H.W to their corresponding discharge at each gauge stations in the study reach. Efficacy of the proposed approach is evaluated through a comparative analysis with the traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. We observed that the BRMA exhibits better performance as compared to the best fit curve obtained by using the OLS regression. We noticed that the functional relationship between the WH‐Q outperforms as compared to the other empirical curves at the both gauge stations of the Ganga River. The accuracy estimates of the Ganga River is in a range of (0.76–0.95), (1–23) and (0.25–0.44). In the Narmada River, the functional relationship between H‐Q outperforms. The accuracy of discharge at both the gauge stations of the Narmada River are found to be in a range (0.76–0.95), (1–23), to (0.25–0.44). This study is a step towards estimating discharge from satellites data.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate river discharge by utilizing limited in‐situ and multi‐satellite data through Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) optimization method (). We establish the BRMA by analyzing the functional relationships (H, W, H.W vs. Q) at four distinct locations along the Ganga (Shahzadpur and Azmabad) and the Narmada (Hoshangabad and Mandleshwer) rivers. To measure the channel width (W) we have used the Landsat 5, 7, and 8 images (2006–2019). We use the water level (H) data from satellite altimeter (Jason 2, Jason 3, Envisat, and Sentinel 3A). We have used BRMA to establish functional relationships between channel width (W), water level (H), and H.W to their corresponding discharge at each gauge stations in the study reach. Efficacy of the proposed approach is evaluated through a comparative analysis with the traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. We observed that the BRMA exhibits better performance as compared to the best fit curve obtained by using the OLS regression. We noticed that the functional relationship between the WH‐Q outperforms as compared to the other empirical curves at the both gauge stations of the Ganga River. The accuracy estimates of the Ganga River is in a range of (0.76–0.95), (1–23) and (0.25–0.44). In the Narmada River, the functional relationship between H‐Q outperforms. The accuracy of discharge at both the gauge stations of the Narmada River are found to be in a range (0.76–0.95), (1–23), to (0.25–0.44). This study is a step towards estimating discharge from satellites data.
引导式还原主轴 (BRMA),优化卫星得出的放电等级曲线
我们通过 Bootstrap Reduced Major Axis (BRMA) 优化方法(),利用有限的原位和多卫星数据估算河流排放量。我们通过分析恒河(Shahzadpur 和 Azmabad)和纳尔马达河(Hoshangabad 和 Mandleshwer)沿岸四个不同地点的功能关系(H、W、H.W vs. Q),建立了引导还原主轴优化法。为了测量河道宽度(W),我们使用了 Landsat 5、7 和 8 图像(2006-2019 年)。我们使用卫星测高仪(Jason 2、Jason 3、Envisat 和 Sentinel 3A)提供的水位(H)数据。我们利用 BRMA 建立了河道宽度(W)、水位(H)和 H.W 与研究河段各测水站相应排水量之间的函数关系。通过与传统的普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归法进行比较分析,评估了所建议方法的有效性。我们发现,与使用 OLS 回归法获得的最佳拟合曲线相比,BRMA 表现出更好的性能。我们注意到,在恒河的两个测站,WH-Q 之间的函数关系优于其他经验曲线。恒河的估计精度范围分别为 (0.76-0.95)、(1-23) 和 (0.25-0.44)。在纳尔马达河,H-Q 之间的函数关系优于 H-Q。纳尔马达河两个测量站的排水量精度范围分别为 (0.76-0.95)、(1-23) 到 (0.25-0.44)。这项研究为利用卫星数据估算排水量迈出了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信