A Cross-sectional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Use in Young Adults of a Tertiary Care Indian Setting

N. Guruvu, Bapugouda Patil, Dayakar Marri, L. V. S. Kutikuppala, Tirumalasetty Devika, Katiboina Srinivasa Rao
{"title":"A Cross-sectional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Use in Young Adults of a Tertiary Care Indian Setting","authors":"N. Guruvu, Bapugouda Patil, Dayakar Marri, L. V. S. Kutikuppala, Tirumalasetty Devika, Katiboina Srinivasa Rao","doi":"10.1177/09760016241258590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuropathic pain refers to the illness that affects the somatosensory nerve system which is characterised by spontaneous pain and pathologically increased sensitivity to both noxious and benign stimuli. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term therapy of young adults with chronic neuropathic pain with gabapentin in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of pregabalin. In cooperation with the Department of Pharmacology at a tertiary care facility in India, the outpatient departments of neurology, orthopaedics, general medicine, and psychiatry undertook this prospective, comparative, randomised, open-label, single-centre cross-sectional study. One hundred and thirty-five patients in Group A received 75 mg of pregabalin and were then given 150 mg of pregabalin twice a day. One hundred thirty-five participants in Group B received 300 mg of gabapentin. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to quantify pain intensity at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months later in order to compare the negative effects of pregabalin to those of gabapentin. When comparing the two groups’ NPRS scores at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months, Group A (pregabalin) had a comparatively lower NPRS score. At baseline, Group A had a mean ± SD score of 8.5 ± 1.25, when compared to Group B with 8.7 ± 1.20. After 2 months, Group A had a mean ± SD score of 2.5 ± 1.50, when compared to Group B with 4.5 ± 1.80, respectively, which was statistically significant with P < .001. This study suggests that gabapentin and pregabalin are equally effective at reducing pain in persons with neuropathic pain. In terms of NPRS score, pregabalin performs better than gabapentin.","PeriodicalId":34670,"journal":{"name":"Apollo Medicine","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apollo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09760016241258590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neuropathic pain refers to the illness that affects the somatosensory nerve system which is characterised by spontaneous pain and pathologically increased sensitivity to both noxious and benign stimuli. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term therapy of young adults with chronic neuropathic pain with gabapentin in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of pregabalin. In cooperation with the Department of Pharmacology at a tertiary care facility in India, the outpatient departments of neurology, orthopaedics, general medicine, and psychiatry undertook this prospective, comparative, randomised, open-label, single-centre cross-sectional study. One hundred and thirty-five patients in Group A received 75 mg of pregabalin and were then given 150 mg of pregabalin twice a day. One hundred thirty-five participants in Group B received 300 mg of gabapentin. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to quantify pain intensity at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months later in order to compare the negative effects of pregabalin to those of gabapentin. When comparing the two groups’ NPRS scores at baseline, 1 month, and 2 months, Group A (pregabalin) had a comparatively lower NPRS score. At baseline, Group A had a mean ± SD score of 8.5 ± 1.25, when compared to Group B with 8.7 ± 1.20. After 2 months, Group A had a mean ± SD score of 2.5 ± 1.50, when compared to Group B with 4.5 ± 1.80, respectively, which was statistically significant with P < .001. This study suggests that gabapentin and pregabalin are equally effective at reducing pain in persons with neuropathic pain. In terms of NPRS score, pregabalin performs better than gabapentin.
评估普瑞巴林在印度三级医疗机构年轻成年人中使用的疗效和安全性的横断面研究
神经病理性疼痛是指影响躯体感觉神经系统的疾病,其特征是自发性疼痛以及对有害和良性刺激的病理敏感性增加。本研究的目的是对患有慢性神经病理性疼痛的年轻成人与加巴喷丁的短期治疗进行比较,以评估普瑞巴林的安全性和有效性。在印度一家三级医疗机构药理学部门的合作下,神经内科、骨科、普通内科和精神病科门诊部开展了这项前瞻性、比较性、随机、开放标签、单中心横断面研究。A 组 135 名患者先服用 75 毫克普瑞巴林,然后再服用 150 毫克普瑞巴林,每天两次。B 组的 135 名参与者接受了 300 毫克的普瑞巴林治疗。为了比较普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁的负面作用,我们使用了数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)来量化基线、1 个月和 2 个月后的疼痛强度。比较两组在基线、1 个月和 2 个月时的 NPRS 分数,A 组(普瑞巴林)的 NPRS 分数相对较低。基线时,A 组的平均分(± SD)为 8.5 ± 1.25,而 B 组为 8.7 ± 1.20。2 个月后,A 组的平均(± SD)分值为 2.5 ± 1.50,而 B 组为 4.5 ± 1.80,差异有统计学意义(P < .001)。这项研究表明,加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林对减轻神经病理性疼痛患者的疼痛同样有效。在 NPRS 评分方面,普瑞巴林的表现优于加巴喷丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信