Are urologists underrepresented on fertility clinic websites? A web-based analysis

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urology Annals Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_97_23
B. Bachir, A. Yacoubian, Oussama G. Nasrallah, Lina El Taha, Fadi Choucair
{"title":"Are urologists underrepresented on fertility clinic websites? A web-based analysis","authors":"B. Bachir, A. Yacoubian, Oussama G. Nasrallah, Lina El Taha, Fadi Choucair","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_97_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Infertile couples frequently utilize the Internet to find various reproductive clinics and research their alternatives. Patients are increasingly using self-referral because of online information on health-care providers. The objective is to compare the image of infertility specialists to other team members on the websites of reproductive clinics.\n \n \n \n Information was gathered during November and December 2022 from two publicly accessible online registries which include the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority located in the United Kingdom and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology located in the United States. We looked over every website that was accessible, paying close attention to how each team member was portrayed online.\n \n \n \n We examined a total of 447 clinic websites. Only 8% of the profiles of male infertility doctors were included. Contrarily, most websites (96%), which specialize in reproductive endocrinology and infertility, feature the profiles of female infertility experts. Male infertility professionals also had significantly lower representation than other clinic employees, such as nurses (55.7%, P < 0.0001), directors of embryology laboratories (46.5%, P < 0.0001), office personnel (39.6%, P < 0.0001), and embryology specialists (29.7%, P < 0.0001).\n \n \n \n Although male factor infertility explains the existence of over half of all cases of infertility, urologists who specialize in male infertility are glaringly understated on websites for fertility clinics. By improving this issue, fertility clinics can draw in more patients by making all members of the care team more visible.\n","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_97_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infertile couples frequently utilize the Internet to find various reproductive clinics and research their alternatives. Patients are increasingly using self-referral because of online information on health-care providers. The objective is to compare the image of infertility specialists to other team members on the websites of reproductive clinics. Information was gathered during November and December 2022 from two publicly accessible online registries which include the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority located in the United Kingdom and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology located in the United States. We looked over every website that was accessible, paying close attention to how each team member was portrayed online. We examined a total of 447 clinic websites. Only 8% of the profiles of male infertility doctors were included. Contrarily, most websites (96%), which specialize in reproductive endocrinology and infertility, feature the profiles of female infertility experts. Male infertility professionals also had significantly lower representation than other clinic employees, such as nurses (55.7%, P < 0.0001), directors of embryology laboratories (46.5%, P < 0.0001), office personnel (39.6%, P < 0.0001), and embryology specialists (29.7%, P < 0.0001). Although male factor infertility explains the existence of over half of all cases of infertility, urologists who specialize in male infertility are glaringly understated on websites for fertility clinics. By improving this issue, fertility clinics can draw in more patients by making all members of the care team more visible.
泌尿科医生在生育诊所网站上的代表性不足吗?基于网络的分析
不育夫妇经常利用互联网寻找各种生殖诊所,研究他们的选择。由于网上有关于医疗服务提供者的信息,患者越来越多地采用自我推荐的方式。本研究旨在比较生殖诊所网站上不孕不育专家与其他团队成员的形象。 我们在 2022 年 11 月和 12 月期间从两个可公开访问的在线登记处收集了信息,其中包括位于英国的人类受精与胚胎学管理局和位于美国的辅助生殖技术协会。我们查看了所有可访问的网站,密切关注每个团队成员在网上的形象。 我们总共检查了 447 个诊所网站。只有 8%的不孕不育男医生的简介被收录其中。相反,大多数生殖内分泌和不孕不育专业网站(96%)都刊登了女性不孕不育专家的简介。男性不孕不育专家的比例也明显低于其他诊所员工,如护士(55.7%,P < 0.0001)、胚胎实验室主任(46.5%,P < 0.0001)、办公室人员(39.6%,P < 0.0001)和胚胎学专家(29.7%,P < 0.0001)。 尽管男性因素导致的不孕症占所有不孕症病例的一半以上,但在不孕不育诊所的网站上,专门从事男性不孕症研究的泌尿科医生却被明显低估了。通过改善这一问题,不孕不育诊所可以通过提高医疗团队所有成员的知名度来吸引更多患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信