Dissociating cerebellar regions involved in formulating and articulating words and sentences

IF 3.6 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Oiwi Parker Jones, Sharon Geva, S. Prejawa, T. Hope, M. Oberhuber, Mohamed L. Seghier, David W. Green, Cathy J. Price
{"title":"Dissociating cerebellar regions involved in formulating and articulating words and sentences","authors":"Oiwi Parker Jones, Sharon Geva, S. Prejawa, T. Hope, M. Oberhuber, Mohamed L. Seghier, David W. Green, Cathy J. Price","doi":"10.1162/nol_a_00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This fMRI study of healthy volunteers investigated which parts of the cerebellum are involved in formulating and articulating sentences using three sentence-based tasks: (i) a sentence production task that involved describing simple events in pictures (e.g. “The goat is eating the hat”); (ii) An auditory sentence repetition task involving the same sentence articulation but not sentence formulation, and (iii) An auditory sentence-topicture matching task that involved the same pictorial events and no overt articulation. Activation for each of these tasks was compared to the equivalent word processing tasks: noun production (object naming), verb production (naming the verb in pictorial events), auditory noun repetition, and auditory noun-to-picture matching. Auditory and visual semantic association tasks were also included, in the same within-subjects design, to control for visual and auditory working memory and semantic processing.\n Three distinct cerebellar regions were activated by sentence production compared to noun and verb production. First, we associate activation in bilateral cerebellum lobule VIIb with sequencing words into sentences, as well as phonemes into words because it increased for sentence production compared to all other conditions, including sentence repetition and sentence-to-picture matching; and was also activated by word production compared to word matching. Second, we associate a paravermal part of right cerebellar lobule VIIIb with overt motor execution of speech, because activation was higher during (i) production and repetition of sentences compared to the corresponding noun conditions, and (ii) noun and verb production compared to all matching tasks; with no activation relative to fixation during any silent (non-speaking) matching task. Third, we associate activation within right cerebellar Crus II with covert articulatory activity because it activated for (i) all speech production more than matching tasks, and (ii) sentences compared to nouns during silent (non-speaking) matching as well as sentence production and sentence repetition.\n As all three regions were activated during word production tasks, our study serendipitously segregated, for the first time, three distinct functional roles for the cerebellum in generic speech production; and demonstrates how sentence production enhanced the demands on these three cerebellar speech production regions.","PeriodicalId":34845,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This fMRI study of healthy volunteers investigated which parts of the cerebellum are involved in formulating and articulating sentences using three sentence-based tasks: (i) a sentence production task that involved describing simple events in pictures (e.g. “The goat is eating the hat”); (ii) An auditory sentence repetition task involving the same sentence articulation but not sentence formulation, and (iii) An auditory sentence-topicture matching task that involved the same pictorial events and no overt articulation. Activation for each of these tasks was compared to the equivalent word processing tasks: noun production (object naming), verb production (naming the verb in pictorial events), auditory noun repetition, and auditory noun-to-picture matching. Auditory and visual semantic association tasks were also included, in the same within-subjects design, to control for visual and auditory working memory and semantic processing. Three distinct cerebellar regions were activated by sentence production compared to noun and verb production. First, we associate activation in bilateral cerebellum lobule VIIb with sequencing words into sentences, as well as phonemes into words because it increased for sentence production compared to all other conditions, including sentence repetition and sentence-to-picture matching; and was also activated by word production compared to word matching. Second, we associate a paravermal part of right cerebellar lobule VIIIb with overt motor execution of speech, because activation was higher during (i) production and repetition of sentences compared to the corresponding noun conditions, and (ii) noun and verb production compared to all matching tasks; with no activation relative to fixation during any silent (non-speaking) matching task. Third, we associate activation within right cerebellar Crus II with covert articulatory activity because it activated for (i) all speech production more than matching tasks, and (ii) sentences compared to nouns during silent (non-speaking) matching as well as sentence production and sentence repetition. As all three regions were activated during word production tasks, our study serendipitously segregated, for the first time, three distinct functional roles for the cerebellum in generic speech production; and demonstrates how sentence production enhanced the demands on these three cerebellar speech production regions.
分离小脑中参与构词和造句的区域
这项针对健康志愿者的 fMRI 研究通过三项以句子为基础的任务调查了小脑的哪些部分参与了句子的表述和衔接:(i) 一项涉及描述图片中简单事件(如 "山羊在吃帽子")的造句任务;(ii) 一项涉及相同句子衔接但不涉及句子表述的听觉句子重复任务;以及 (iii) 一项涉及相同图片事件但不涉及明显衔接的听觉句子-图片匹配任务。每项任务的激活情况都与相应的文字处理任务进行了比较:名词制作(对象命名)、动词制作(在图像事件中命名动词)、听觉名词重复和听觉名词与图像匹配。听觉和视觉语义联想任务也包括在内,采用相同的被试内设计,以控制视觉和听觉工作记忆和语义处理。与名词和动词造句相比,造句激活了三个不同的小脑区域。首先,我们将双侧小脑第VIIb小叶的激活与单词到句子的排序以及音素到单词的排序联系起来,因为与所有其他条件(包括句子重复和句子到图片的匹配)相比,句子生成会增加小脑第VIIb小叶的激活;与单词匹配相比,单词生成也会激活小脑第VIIb小叶。其次,我们将右侧小脑第 VIIIb 小叶的边缘部分与言语的公开运动执行联系起来,因为(i) 与相应的名词条件相比,在造句和复述句子时,以及(ii) 与所有配对任务相比,在造名词和动词时,激活程度更高;而在任何无声(不说话)配对任务中,相对于固定点没有激活。第三,我们将右侧小脑第二簇的激活与隐蔽发音活动联系起来,因为它在以下情况下激活:(i) 在所有语音生成任务中比在匹配任务中激活更多,(ii) 在无声(不说话)匹配以及句子生成和句子重复过程中,句子比名词激活更多。由于在造词任务中这三个区域都被激活,我们的研究首次偶然分离出了小脑在一般言语生成中的三种不同功能作用;并证明了句子生成如何提高了对这三个小脑言语生成区域的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Language
Neurobiology of Language Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信