Characterization of Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungal Isolates: Growth Dynamics, Viability, Density, and Morphological Attributes

S. S. Monica, P. Rajanikanth, P. Duraimurugan, S. A. Basha, D. S. Chary
{"title":"Characterization of Endophytic Entomopathogenic Fungal Isolates: Growth Dynamics, Viability, Density, and Morphological Attributes","authors":"S. S. Monica, P. Rajanikanth, P. Duraimurugan, S. A. Basha, D. S. Chary","doi":"10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aims to comprehensively characterize endophytic entomopathogenic fungal isolates, focusing on their growth dynamics, viability, density, and morphological attributes, with implications for biocontrol strategies against insect pests. \nStudy Design: The research tracked radial growth rates of fungal isolates over 21 days, conducted conidial viability assessments at 24 and 48 hours, measured conidial density, and performed morphological analysis to identify distinct characteristics. \nMethodology: Endophytic entomopathogenic fungal isolates, including Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium lecanii, were subjected to radial growth rate tracking, viability assessments, density measurements, and morphological analysis. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant variations among isolates and time intervals. \nResults: Significant variations in radial growth rates were observed among isolates, with Beauveria bassiana isolate ChBb exhibiting a rate of 3.66 mm/day, followed by B. bassiana isolate NaBb with 3.92 mm/day, and Lecanicillium lecanii isolate KmLl with 3.06 mm/day. Conidial viability assessments revealed temporal dynamics, with NaBb maintaining the highest viability at both 24 and 48 hours. Additionally, significant differences in conidial density were noted, with NaBb exhibiting the highest density followed by ChBb and KmLl. Morphological analysis unveiled distinct characteristics among isolates, including differences in conidia length, width, and length-to-width ratio. \nConclusion: The findings underscore the potential of Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium lecanii isolates in biocontrol strategies against insect pests, highlighting their varying growth dynamics, viability, density, and morphological attributes. These insights contribute to the understanding of entomopathogenic fungi and their applications in sustainable pest management practices.","PeriodicalId":505977,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research and Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2024/v30i72124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to comprehensively characterize endophytic entomopathogenic fungal isolates, focusing on their growth dynamics, viability, density, and morphological attributes, with implications for biocontrol strategies against insect pests. Study Design: The research tracked radial growth rates of fungal isolates over 21 days, conducted conidial viability assessments at 24 and 48 hours, measured conidial density, and performed morphological analysis to identify distinct characteristics. Methodology: Endophytic entomopathogenic fungal isolates, including Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium lecanii, were subjected to radial growth rate tracking, viability assessments, density measurements, and morphological analysis. Statistical analysis was employed to identify significant variations among isolates and time intervals. Results: Significant variations in radial growth rates were observed among isolates, with Beauveria bassiana isolate ChBb exhibiting a rate of 3.66 mm/day, followed by B. bassiana isolate NaBb with 3.92 mm/day, and Lecanicillium lecanii isolate KmLl with 3.06 mm/day. Conidial viability assessments revealed temporal dynamics, with NaBb maintaining the highest viability at both 24 and 48 hours. Additionally, significant differences in conidial density were noted, with NaBb exhibiting the highest density followed by ChBb and KmLl. Morphological analysis unveiled distinct characteristics among isolates, including differences in conidia length, width, and length-to-width ratio. Conclusion: The findings underscore the potential of Beauveria bassiana and Lecanicillium lecanii isolates in biocontrol strategies against insect pests, highlighting their varying growth dynamics, viability, density, and morphological attributes. These insights contribute to the understanding of entomopathogenic fungi and their applications in sustainable pest management practices.
内生昆虫病原真菌菌株的特征:生长动态、活力、密度和形态特征
研究目的:本研究旨在全面描述内生昆虫病原真菌分离物的特征,重点研究其生长动态、活力、密度和形态特征,从而为针对害虫的生物防治策略提供参考。研究设计:研究跟踪真菌分离物 21 天内的径向生长速度,在 24 和 48 小时内进行分生孢子活力评估,测量分生孢子密度,并进行形态分析以确定其明显特征。方法:对内生昆虫病原真菌分离物(包括 Beauveria bassiana 和 Lecanicillium lecanii)进行径向生长率跟踪、活力评估、密度测定和形态分析。采用统计分析来确定不同分离物和时间间隔之间的显著差异。结果分离物之间的径向生长率存在显著差异,Beauveria bassiana 分离物 ChBb 的径向生长率为 3.66 毫米/天,其次是 B. bassiana 分离物 NaBb,为 3.92 毫米/天,Lecanicillium lecanii 分离物 KmLl 为 3.06 毫米/天。分生孢子活力评估显示了时间动态变化,NaBb 在 24 小时和 48 小时内都保持了最高的活力。此外,分生孢子密度也存在显著差异,NaBb 的密度最高,ChBb 和 KmLl 紧随其后。形态学分析揭示了分离物之间的独特特征,包括分生孢子长度、宽度和长宽比的差异。结论研究结果强调了 Beauveria bassiana 和 Lecanicillium lecanii 分离物在针对害虫的生物控制策略中的潜力,突出了它们不同的生长动态、活力、密度和形态特征。这些见解有助于人们了解昆虫病原真菌及其在可持续害虫管理实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信