Control Authority of a Single-Surface Parafoil with Bleed-Air Spoilers

IF 1.5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Donald J. Ward, Andrea L. Vu, Mark Costello
{"title":"Control Authority of a Single-Surface Parafoil with Bleed-Air Spoilers","authors":"Donald J. Ward, Andrea L. Vu, Mark Costello","doi":"10.2514/1.c037791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bleed-air control of ram-air parafoils is a lightweight and cost-effective mechanism that enables significant landing accuracy improvements compared to traditional trailing edge brake control due to the addition of direct glide slope control. Single-surface parafoil canopies have been shown to be lightweight and possess similar flight behavior as their ram-air counterparts. The design of bleed-air spoilers is more challenging for single-surface canopies, which lack the internal ram-air that provides a high pressure differential at any chordwise location. This paper explores bleed-air spoilers on single-surface parafoils with a focus on turn rate and glide slope control capabilities. Through a flight test campaign, it was shown that bleed-air spoilers on a single-surface parafoil provide both turn rate control from asymmetric vent opening and glide slope change from symmetric vent opening. Vents located far forward at the 10% chord location yield substantial control response with a maximum turn rate response of 38 deg/s and a maximum glide slope change of 58%. Vents located farther aft at 30, 50, and 70% chords demonstrated diminished control authority. Varying the spanwise locations of the spoilers revealed that the outermost vents had negligible lateral and longitudinal control authority.","PeriodicalId":14927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aircraft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aircraft","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.c037791","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bleed-air control of ram-air parafoils is a lightweight and cost-effective mechanism that enables significant landing accuracy improvements compared to traditional trailing edge brake control due to the addition of direct glide slope control. Single-surface parafoil canopies have been shown to be lightweight and possess similar flight behavior as their ram-air counterparts. The design of bleed-air spoilers is more challenging for single-surface canopies, which lack the internal ram-air that provides a high pressure differential at any chordwise location. This paper explores bleed-air spoilers on single-surface parafoils with a focus on turn rate and glide slope control capabilities. Through a flight test campaign, it was shown that bleed-air spoilers on a single-surface parafoil provide both turn rate control from asymmetric vent opening and glide slope change from symmetric vent opening. Vents located far forward at the 10% chord location yield substantial control response with a maximum turn rate response of 38 deg/s and a maximum glide slope change of 58%. Vents located farther aft at 30, 50, and 70% chords demonstrated diminished control authority. Varying the spanwise locations of the spoilers revealed that the outermost vents had negligible lateral and longitudinal control authority.
带有放气扰流板的单面伞翼的控制权
冲压空气副翼的放气控制是一种重量轻、成本效益高的机制,与传统的后缘制动控制相比,由于增加了直接的滑行斜坡控制,着陆精度得到显著提高。研究表明,单面伞翼的重量轻,飞行性能与冲压式伞翼相似。对于单面伞翼来说,设计放气扰流板更具挑战性,因为单面伞翼缺乏内部冲压空气,无法在任何弦向位置提供高压差。本文探讨了单面伞翼上的放气扰流板,重点是转弯率和滑翔坡度控制能力。通过飞行测试活动表明,单面伞翼上的放气扰流板既能通过非对称打开通气孔控制转弯率,也能通过对称打开通气孔改变滑翔坡度。位于前方 10%弦线位置的通风口可产生很大的控制响应,最大转弯率响应为 38 度/秒,最大滑翔斜率变化为 58%。位于机尾较远的 30%、50% 和 70% 弦处的通风口显示出较低的控制能力。改变扰流板的跨度位置可以发现,最外侧的通风口的横向和纵向控制能力几乎可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aircraft
Journal of Aircraft 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
31.80%
发文量
141
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the applied science and technology of airborne flight through the dissemination of original archival papers describing significant advances in aircraft, the operation of aircraft, and applications of aircraft technology to other fields. The Journal publishes qualified papers on aircraft systems, air transportation, air traffic management, and multidisciplinary design optimization of aircraft, flight mechanics, flight and ground testing, applied computational fluid dynamics, flight safety, weather and noise hazards, human factors, airport design, airline operations, application of computers to aircraft including artificial intelligence/expert systems, production methods, engineering economic analyses, affordability, reliability, maintainability, and logistics support, integration of propulsion and control systems into aircraft design and operations, aircraft aerodynamics (including unsteady aerodynamics), structural design/dynamics , aeroelasticity, and aeroacoustics. It publishes papers on general aviation, military and civilian aircraft, UAV, STOL and V/STOL, subsonic, supersonic, transonic, and hypersonic aircraft. Papers are sought which comprehensively survey results of recent technical work with emphasis on aircraft technology application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信