Valorization of bottom ash in concrete: serviceability, microstructural and sustainability characterization

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Nitin Ankur, Navdeep Singh
{"title":"Valorization of bottom ash in concrete: serviceability, microstructural and sustainability characterization","authors":"Nitin Ankur, Navdeep Singh","doi":"10.1680/jmacr.23.00313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study investigated the synergistic influence of bottom ash as a Portland cement (PC) and natural fine aggregate (NFA) replacement in concrete. Coal bottom ash (CBA) is a heavy ash that settles at bottom of combustion chamber of a thermal power plant and was grinded (GCBA) for two hours prior to replacing 10-30% PC whereas CBA was used in raw form to replace 25% and 50% NFA. The mechanical properties along with durability properties (accelerated carbonation and chloride penetration) were studied after 28 day and 90 days curing. Non-destructive tests were also performed to check the quality of CBA based concrete. Microstructural characterization was conducted using various techniques like XRD, SEM and FTIR. The concrete with 20% GCBA and 25% CBA (G20C25) reported best performance in terms of parameters studied owing to pozzolanic reactivity of GCBA and filler effect of fine CBA. The microstructural investigations also validated the findings and trends observed of experimental results. Well fitted mathematical models were derived and optimisation was carried out using desirability function approach. Multi-objective optimization recommended 21.80% GCBA and 24.17% CBA as the optimum amount resulting in significant reduction of 19.19% and 18.19% in carbon footprints and eco-costs compared to control mix.","PeriodicalId":18113,"journal":{"name":"Magazine of Concrete Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magazine of Concrete Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.23.00313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the synergistic influence of bottom ash as a Portland cement (PC) and natural fine aggregate (NFA) replacement in concrete. Coal bottom ash (CBA) is a heavy ash that settles at bottom of combustion chamber of a thermal power plant and was grinded (GCBA) for two hours prior to replacing 10-30% PC whereas CBA was used in raw form to replace 25% and 50% NFA. The mechanical properties along with durability properties (accelerated carbonation and chloride penetration) were studied after 28 day and 90 days curing. Non-destructive tests were also performed to check the quality of CBA based concrete. Microstructural characterization was conducted using various techniques like XRD, SEM and FTIR. The concrete with 20% GCBA and 25% CBA (G20C25) reported best performance in terms of parameters studied owing to pozzolanic reactivity of GCBA and filler effect of fine CBA. The microstructural investigations also validated the findings and trends observed of experimental results. Well fitted mathematical models were derived and optimisation was carried out using desirability function approach. Multi-objective optimization recommended 21.80% GCBA and 24.17% CBA as the optimum amount resulting in significant reduction of 19.19% and 18.19% in carbon footprints and eco-costs compared to control mix.
底灰在混凝土中的应用:适用性、微观结构和可持续性表征
本研究调查了煤底灰作为硅酸盐水泥(PC)和天然细骨料(NFA)替代品在混凝土中的协同影响。煤炭底灰(CBA)是一种沉淀在火力发电厂燃烧室底部的重灰,在替代 10-30% 的 PC 之前,先将其研磨(GCBA)两小时,然后再用 CBA 原状替代 25% 和 50% 的 NFA。在 28 天和 90 天固化后,对机械性能和耐久性能(加速碳化和氯化物渗透)进行了研究。此外,还进行了非破坏性测试,以检查 CBA 混凝土的质量。采用 XRD、SEM 和 FTIR 等多种技术对微观结构进行了表征。含有 20% GCBA 和 25% CBA 的混凝土(G20C25)在所研究的参数方面表现最佳,这主要归功于 GCBA 的水合反应活性和细 CBA 的填充效果。微观结构研究也验证了实验结果的结论和趋势。得出了拟合良好的数学模型,并采用理想函数法进行了优化。多目标优化推荐 21.80% 的 GCBA 和 24.17% 的 CBA 为最佳用量,与对照组相比,碳足迹和生态成本分别显著降低了 19.19% 和 18.19%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magazine of Concrete Research
Magazine of Concrete Research 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: For concrete and other cementitious derivatives to be developed further, we need to understand the use of alternative hydraulically active materials used in combination with plain Portland Cement, sustainability and durability issues. Both fundamental and best practice issues need to be addressed. Magazine of Concrete Research covers every aspect of concrete manufacture and behaviour from performance and evaluation of constituent materials to mix design, testing, durability, structural analysis and composite construction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信