Seth A. Moore, William J. Severud, Tiffany M. Wolf, Katharine Pelican, Joseph Bauerkemper, Michelle Carstensen, Steven K. Windels
{"title":"Indigenous co-stewardship of North American moose: recommendations and a vision for a restoration framework","authors":"Seth A. Moore, William J. Severud, Tiffany M. Wolf, Katharine Pelican, Joseph Bauerkemper, Michelle Carstensen, Steven K. Windels","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Moose (<i>Alces alces</i>; mooz [singular], moozoog [plural] in Anishinaabemowin, Ojibwe language) are an important species to many Indigenous rights-holders and stakeholders throughout their circumpolar range. Management of moose can often lead to conflict when various perspectives of Indigenous nations are not recognized or appreciated. During the 55th North American Moose Conference and Workshop held in Grand Portage, Minnesota, USA, we held a workshop with 145 participants centered around co-stewardship of moose among various Indigenous nations, federal, state, and provincial governments, academia, and non-governmental agencies. Using a facilitator, the participants identified opportunities and challenges surrounding issues related to moose management. Participants then further identified priority improvements and action steps for co-stewardship. Six core principles of Indigenous co-stewardship were developed: 1) recognition of Indigenous Sovereignty, which specifies that co-stewardship must begin with a recognition of the sovereignty of Indigenous nations and their inherent rights to manage, conserve, and preserve natural and cultural resources within their ancestral lands; 2) shared responsibility, where co-stewardship is a shared responsibility between Indigenous nations, federal governments, and state governments; 3) cultural and ecological respect, which stipulates that co-stewardship should honor the cultural significance of moose to Indigenous nations and recognize the ecological importance of moose within the broader ecosystem; 4) inclusive decision-making, which details that co-stewardship requires inclusive and equitable decision-making processes that involve meaningful consultation and consent from Indigenous nations; 5) resource sharing and capacity building, where co-stewardship involves the sharing of resources and knowledge between Indigenous and non-Indigenous partners; and 6) adaptive management and sustainability, specifying that co-stewardship should embrace adaptive management principles, where management strategies are continuously evaluated, adjusted, and improved based on new information and changing conditions. Some of the key takeaways from the workshop included that it will be essential to integrate Indigenous ways of knowing into an equitable and inclusive management system, there are existing models of co-stewardship that can be built upon, it is critical to build trust among all key stakeholders and rights-holders, and it will be important to establish formal and informal collaborative systems among all partners to support co-stewardship at all levels. We discuss a study and synthesis on Indigenous co-stewardship of moose and offer a synopsis and recommendations to advance restoration of moose in North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"88 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22623","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Moose (Alces alces; mooz [singular], moozoog [plural] in Anishinaabemowin, Ojibwe language) are an important species to many Indigenous rights-holders and stakeholders throughout their circumpolar range. Management of moose can often lead to conflict when various perspectives of Indigenous nations are not recognized or appreciated. During the 55th North American Moose Conference and Workshop held in Grand Portage, Minnesota, USA, we held a workshop with 145 participants centered around co-stewardship of moose among various Indigenous nations, federal, state, and provincial governments, academia, and non-governmental agencies. Using a facilitator, the participants identified opportunities and challenges surrounding issues related to moose management. Participants then further identified priority improvements and action steps for co-stewardship. Six core principles of Indigenous co-stewardship were developed: 1) recognition of Indigenous Sovereignty, which specifies that co-stewardship must begin with a recognition of the sovereignty of Indigenous nations and their inherent rights to manage, conserve, and preserve natural and cultural resources within their ancestral lands; 2) shared responsibility, where co-stewardship is a shared responsibility between Indigenous nations, federal governments, and state governments; 3) cultural and ecological respect, which stipulates that co-stewardship should honor the cultural significance of moose to Indigenous nations and recognize the ecological importance of moose within the broader ecosystem; 4) inclusive decision-making, which details that co-stewardship requires inclusive and equitable decision-making processes that involve meaningful consultation and consent from Indigenous nations; 5) resource sharing and capacity building, where co-stewardship involves the sharing of resources and knowledge between Indigenous and non-Indigenous partners; and 6) adaptive management and sustainability, specifying that co-stewardship should embrace adaptive management principles, where management strategies are continuously evaluated, adjusted, and improved based on new information and changing conditions. Some of the key takeaways from the workshop included that it will be essential to integrate Indigenous ways of knowing into an equitable and inclusive management system, there are existing models of co-stewardship that can be built upon, it is critical to build trust among all key stakeholders and rights-holders, and it will be important to establish formal and informal collaborative systems among all partners to support co-stewardship at all levels. We discuss a study and synthesis on Indigenous co-stewardship of moose and offer a synopsis and recommendations to advance restoration of moose in North America.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.