Improved Interpretation of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressures through Left Atrial Volumetry—A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Gülmisal Güder, Theresa Reiter, M. Drayss, Wolfgang Bauer, B. Lengenfelder, P. Nordbeck, G. Fette, S. Frantz, C. Morbach, Stefan Störk
{"title":"Improved Interpretation of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressures through Left Atrial Volumetry—A Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study","authors":"Gülmisal Güder, Theresa Reiter, M. Drayss, Wolfgang Bauer, B. Lengenfelder, P. Nordbeck, G. Fette, S. Frantz, C. Morbach, Stefan Störk","doi":"10.3390/jcdd11060178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is regarded as a reliable indicator of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), but this association is weaker in patients with left-sided heart disease (LHD). We compared morphological differences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with or without elevation of PAWP or LVEDP. Methods: We retrospectively identified 121 patients with LVEF < 50% who had undergone right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR. LVEDP data were available for 75 patients. Results: The mean age of the study sample was 63 ± 14 years, the mean LVEF was 32 ± 10%, and 72% were men. About 53% of the patients had an elevated PAWP (>15 mmHg). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, NT-proBNP, left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF), and LV end-systolic volume index independently predicted an elevated PAWP. Of the 75 patients with available LVEDP data, 79% had an elevated LVEDP, and 70% had concomitant PAWP elevation. By contrast, all but one patient with elevated PAWP and half of the patients with normal PAWP had concomitant LVEDP elevation. The Bland–Altman plot revealed a systematic bias of +5.0 mmHg between LVEDP and PAWP. Notably, LAEF was the only CMR variable that differed significantly between patients with elevated LVEDP and a PAWP ≤ or >15 mmHg. Conclusions: In patients with LVEF < 50%, a normal PAWP did not reliably exclude LHD, and an elevated LVEDP was more frequent than an elevated PAWP. LAEF was the most relevant determinant of an increased PAWP, suggesting that a preserved LAEF in LHD may protect against backward failure into the lungs and the subsequent increase in pulmonary pressure.","PeriodicalId":502527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd11060178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is regarded as a reliable indicator of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), but this association is weaker in patients with left-sided heart disease (LHD). We compared morphological differences in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), with or without elevation of PAWP or LVEDP. Methods: We retrospectively identified 121 patients with LVEF < 50% who had undergone right heart catheterization (RHC) and CMR. LVEDP data were available for 75 patients. Results: The mean age of the study sample was 63 ± 14 years, the mean LVEF was 32 ± 10%, and 72% were men. About 53% of the patients had an elevated PAWP (>15 mmHg). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, NT-proBNP, left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF), and LV end-systolic volume index independently predicted an elevated PAWP. Of the 75 patients with available LVEDP data, 79% had an elevated LVEDP, and 70% had concomitant PAWP elevation. By contrast, all but one patient with elevated PAWP and half of the patients with normal PAWP had concomitant LVEDP elevation. The Bland–Altman plot revealed a systematic bias of +5.0 mmHg between LVEDP and PAWP. Notably, LAEF was the only CMR variable that differed significantly between patients with elevated LVEDP and a PAWP ≤ or >15 mmHg. Conclusions: In patients with LVEF < 50%, a normal PAWP did not reliably exclude LHD, and an elevated LVEDP was more frequent than an elevated PAWP. LAEF was the most relevant determinant of an increased PAWP, suggesting that a preserved LAEF in LHD may protect against backward failure into the lungs and the subsequent increase in pulmonary pressure.
通过左心房容积测量改进肺动脉楔压的解读--心脏磁共振成像研究
背景:肺动脉楔压(PAWP)被认为是左心室舒张末压(LVEDP)的可靠指标,但在左侧心脏病(LHD)患者中这种关联性较弱。我们比较了心力衰竭(HF)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低、PAWP 或 LVEDP 升高或未升高的患者心脏磁共振成像(CMR)的形态学差异。方法我们回顾性地确定了 121 名 LVEF < 50% 的患者,他们都接受了右心导管检查 (RHC) 和 CMR。75例患者的LVEDP数据可用。研究结果研究样本的平均年龄为 63 ± 14 岁,平均 LVEF 为 32 ± 10%,72% 为男性。约 53% 的患者 PAWP 升高(>15 mmHg)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,NT-proBNP、左心房射血分数(LAEF)和左心室收缩末期容积指数可独立预测 PAWP 升高。在 75 位有 LVEDP 数据的患者中,79% 的患者 LVEDP 升高,70% 的患者同时伴有 PAWP 升高。相比之下,除一名患者外,所有 PAWP 升高的患者和一半 PAWP 正常的患者都伴有 LVEDP 升高。Bland-Altman图显示,LVEDP和PAWP之间存在+5.0 mmHg的系统性偏差。值得注意的是,LAEF 是 LVEDP 升高且 PAWP ≤ 或大于 15 mmHg 的患者之间唯一存在显著差异的 CMR 变量。结论:在 LVEF < 50% 的患者中,PAWP 正常并不能可靠地排除 LHD,LVEDP 升高比 PAWP 升高更常见。LAEF是决定PAWP是否升高的最重要因素,这表明LHD患者保留LAEF可防止向肺后衰竭及随后的肺压升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信