Sampling unit and optimal sample size for the detection of Aeneolamia albofasciata (Lallemand) eggs in sugarcane

Juan Antonio Villanueva Jiménez, José Jair Canela Cantellano, Héctor Cabrera Mireles, José López Collado, Luis Gabriel Otero Prevost
{"title":"Sampling unit and optimal sample size for the detection of Aeneolamia albofasciata (Lallemand) eggs in sugarcane","authors":"Juan Antonio Villanueva Jiménez, José Jair Canela Cantellano, Héctor Cabrera Mireles, José López Collado, Luis Gabriel Otero Prevost","doi":"10.32854/agrop.v17i5.2756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the efficiency of a 30x30x5 cm iron sampling frame (Frame30) with a smaller 15x15x5 cm one (Frame15), as sampling method for spittlebug eggs [(Aenolamia albofasciata (Lallemand)] that reduces the amount of soil removed, optimizes time used, and reduces the sampling effort.\nDesign/methodology/approach: Mean, variance, coefficient of variation, sampling effort, spatial arrangement, and sample size were determined with both sampling frames. Forty systematic soil samples were obtained using each frame in two plots planted with the variety MEX 69-290, and two others with MEX 91-662. Each soil sample was mixed and homogenized to obtain a subsample of 250 g, from which eggs were extracted by decantation in saline solution.\nResults: Both frames estimated different numbers of eggs in the four plots ( ) (Frame15: 2.71±1.71; 3.49±1.81; 2.74±2.08; 4.44±2.22; Frame30: 4.42±3.58; 6.65±3.92; 4.40±3.45; 7.84±4.54). Significant differences were found between sampling frames (P<0.0001) and between plots (P<0.0001), but not in the plot-sampling frame interaction (P=0.1509). The optimal sample size (accuracy 0.1) was smaller with Frame15 (40, 27, 57 and 25), compared to Frame30 (65, 34, 61 and 34). Both frames estimated a conglomerated spatial arrangement of eggs using three methods.\nLimitations on study/implications: This study suggests changing the sampling frame used in Veracruz, Mexico, for a smaller, more efficient one.\nFindings/conclusions: Frame15 reduced by 75% the soil removed, provided more accurate population estimates, and simplified field and laboratory management, compared with Frame30.","PeriodicalId":153856,"journal":{"name":"Agro Productividad","volume":"62 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro Productividad","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v17i5.2756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficiency of a 30x30x5 cm iron sampling frame (Frame30) with a smaller 15x15x5 cm one (Frame15), as sampling method for spittlebug eggs [(Aenolamia albofasciata (Lallemand)] that reduces the amount of soil removed, optimizes time used, and reduces the sampling effort. Design/methodology/approach: Mean, variance, coefficient of variation, sampling effort, spatial arrangement, and sample size were determined with both sampling frames. Forty systematic soil samples were obtained using each frame in two plots planted with the variety MEX 69-290, and two others with MEX 91-662. Each soil sample was mixed and homogenized to obtain a subsample of 250 g, from which eggs were extracted by decantation in saline solution. Results: Both frames estimated different numbers of eggs in the four plots ( ) (Frame15: 2.71±1.71; 3.49±1.81; 2.74±2.08; 4.44±2.22; Frame30: 4.42±3.58; 6.65±3.92; 4.40±3.45; 7.84±4.54). Significant differences were found between sampling frames (P<0.0001) and between plots (P<0.0001), but not in the plot-sampling frame interaction (P=0.1509). The optimal sample size (accuracy 0.1) was smaller with Frame15 (40, 27, 57 and 25), compared to Frame30 (65, 34, 61 and 34). Both frames estimated a conglomerated spatial arrangement of eggs using three methods. Limitations on study/implications: This study suggests changing the sampling frame used in Veracruz, Mexico, for a smaller, more efficient one. Findings/conclusions: Frame15 reduced by 75% the soil removed, provided more accurate population estimates, and simplified field and laboratory management, compared with Frame30.
检测甘蔗中 Aeneolamia albofasciata (Lallemand) 卵的取样单位和最佳取样量
目的比较 30x30x5 厘米铁质取样框(Frame30)和 15x15x5 厘米较小取样框(Frame15)的效率,作为唾蝽卵[(Aenolamia albofasciata (Lallemand))的取样方法,这种取样方法可减少取土量、优化使用时间并减少取样工作量:使用两种取样框架确定了平均值、方差、变异系数、取样工作量、空间布局和样本量。在种植了 MEX 69-290 和 MEX 91-662 两个品种的两块地中,使用每个取样框获得了 40 个系统土壤样本。每个土壤样本都经过混合和均质处理,以获得 250 克的子样本,然后在盐溶液中倾析提取虫卵:两个取样框架估计的四个地块的虫卵数量不同()(取样框架 15:2.71±1.71;3.49±1.81;2.74±2.08;4.44±2.22;取样框架 30:4.42±3.58;6.65±3.92;4.40±3.45;7.84±4.54)。不同取样框之间(P<0.0001)和不同地块之间(P<0.0001)存在显著差异,但地块-取样框交互作用(P=0.1509)不存在显著差异。与框架 30(65、34、61 和 34)相比,框架 15(40、27、57 和 25)的最佳样本量(精确度 0.1)较小。两个框架都使用三种方法估计了卵的聚集空间分布:研究的局限性/意义:本研究建议改变墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州使用的取样框架,改用更小、更有效的取样框架:与 Frame30 相比,Frame15 减少了 75% 的土壤清除量,提供了更准确的种群数量估计,并简化了现场和实验室管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信