Flu vaccine hesitancy of French nurses and nurse aides: A fresh light on freedom-restoring strategies of reactance to pro-vaccine communication

Marie-Claire Wilhelm, Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret, Alexandre Mignot, O. Epaulard
{"title":"Flu vaccine hesitancy of French nurses and nurse aides: A fresh light on freedom-restoring strategies of reactance to pro-vaccine communication","authors":"Marie-Claire Wilhelm, Marie-Laure Gavard-Perret, Alexandre Mignot, O. Epaulard","doi":"10.1177/20515707241242672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite numerous campaigns, influenza vaccination of healthcare workers remains insufficient in France. The highly cognitive approach of persuasion models in healthcare poorly explains this non-vaccination. A survey of 794 French nurses and nurse aides in 2018 highlights the role of psychological reactance. The greater their perceived threat to freedom due to vaccination pressure, the more it generates situational reactance and strategies for restoring their threatened freedom: denial or minimization of the health threat (low perceptions of severity and vulnerability to influenza) and diminished attractiveness or denigration of the recommended option or its source (low perceptions of efficacy and benefits of vaccination), leading to rejection of the recommended behavior (flu vaccination). This original modeling of variables traditionally seen as antecedents to reactance explains persuasive failure and is contextualized and discussed through objective characteristics (age, profession). Managerial recommendations and avenues of research follow.","PeriodicalId":509922,"journal":{"name":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20515707241242672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite numerous campaigns, influenza vaccination of healthcare workers remains insufficient in France. The highly cognitive approach of persuasion models in healthcare poorly explains this non-vaccination. A survey of 794 French nurses and nurse aides in 2018 highlights the role of psychological reactance. The greater their perceived threat to freedom due to vaccination pressure, the more it generates situational reactance and strategies for restoring their threatened freedom: denial or minimization of the health threat (low perceptions of severity and vulnerability to influenza) and diminished attractiveness or denigration of the recommended option or its source (low perceptions of efficacy and benefits of vaccination), leading to rejection of the recommended behavior (flu vaccination). This original modeling of variables traditionally seen as antecedents to reactance explains persuasive failure and is contextualized and discussed through objective characteristics (age, profession). Managerial recommendations and avenues of research follow.
法国护士和护士助理对流感疫苗的犹豫不决:对支持疫苗宣传的反应策略的新认识
尽管开展了多次宣传活动,但法国医护人员的流感疫苗接种率仍然不足。医疗保健领域说服模式的高度认知方法无法很好地解释未接种疫苗的原因。2018 年对 794 名法国护士和护士助理进行的一项调查凸显了心理反应的作用。他们感知到的疫苗接种压力对自由的威胁越大,就越会产生情境反应和恢复受威胁自由的策略:否认或最小化健康威胁(对流感严重性和易感性的低感知),降低推荐选项或其来源的吸引力或诋毁(对疫苗接种的功效和益处的低感知),从而导致拒绝接受推荐行为(流感疫苗接种)。这种对传统上被视为反应前因的变量的独创建模解释了说服失败的原因,并通过客观特征(年龄、职业)进行了背景分析和讨论。随后提出了管理建议和研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信