Structurally unjust: how lay beliefs about racism relate to responses to racial inequality in the criminal legal system

Julian M. Rucker, Ajua Duker, J. Richeson
{"title":"Structurally unjust: how lay beliefs about racism relate to responses to racial inequality in the criminal legal system","authors":"Julian M. Rucker, Ajua Duker, J. Richeson","doi":"10.3389/frsps.2024.1332527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Racial inequality has been a persistent component of American society since its inception. The present research investigates how lay beliefs about the nature of racism—as primarily caused by prejudiced individuals or, rather, to structural factors (i.e., policies, institutional practices) that disadvantage members of marginalized racial groups—predict reactions to evidence of racial inequality in the criminal legal system (Studies 1–3). Specifically, the current research suggests that holding a more structural (vs. interpersonal) view of racism predicts a greater tendency to perceive racial inequality in criminal legal outcomes. Moreover, White Americans' lay beliefs regarding racism, coupled with their general degree of preference for societal hierarchy, predict support for policies that would impact disparities in the U.S. prison population. Together, this work suggests that an appreciation of structural racism plays an important role in how people perceive and respond to racial inequality.","PeriodicalId":503123,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Social Psychology","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1332527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racial inequality has been a persistent component of American society since its inception. The present research investigates how lay beliefs about the nature of racism—as primarily caused by prejudiced individuals or, rather, to structural factors (i.e., policies, institutional practices) that disadvantage members of marginalized racial groups—predict reactions to evidence of racial inequality in the criminal legal system (Studies 1–3). Specifically, the current research suggests that holding a more structural (vs. interpersonal) view of racism predicts a greater tendency to perceive racial inequality in criminal legal outcomes. Moreover, White Americans' lay beliefs regarding racism, coupled with their general degree of preference for societal hierarchy, predict support for policies that would impact disparities in the U.S. prison population. Together, this work suggests that an appreciation of structural racism plays an important role in how people perceive and respond to racial inequality.
结构上的不公正:非专业人士对种族主义的看法与应对刑事法律制度中种族不平等现象的关系
自美国社会建立以来,种族不平等一直是其顽固的组成部分。本研究调查了外行人对种族主义性质的看法--主要是由有偏见的个人造成的,还是由不利于边缘化种族群体成员的结构性因素(即政策、制度惯例)造成的--如何预测对刑事法律系统中种族不平等证据的反应(研究1-3)。具体而言,目前的研究表明,持有结构性(相对于人际关系)种族主义观点的人更倾向于认为刑事法律结果中存在种族不平等。此外,美国白人对种族主义的非专业信念,加上他们对社会等级制度的普遍偏好程度,也预示着他们对影响美国监狱人口差异的政策的支持程度。总之,这项研究表明,对结构性种族主义的认识在人们如何看待和应对种族不平等方面发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信