THE ANALYSIS STUDY OF OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURE RISK : A TEN YEARS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Yosie Yulanda Putra, Deby Tri Lestari, Zikry Saputra, Bella Merisa Liona
{"title":"THE ANALYSIS STUDY OF OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURE RISK : A TEN YEARS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Yosie Yulanda Putra, Deby Tri Lestari, Zikry Saputra, Bella Merisa Liona","doi":"10.61841/nagrwm92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Microarchitecture degeneration and reduced bone mass, which increase fragility and fracture susceptibility, are hallmarks of osteoporosis, a systemic skeletal disorder. Disease has a substantial effect on fracture healing as well as bone mass and microstructure. More accurate fracture risk assessment and a wider range of treatment choices are the results of research advances. Effective treatment regimens for osteoporosis have been aided by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), which has had a substantial impact on clinical decision-making and intervention levels. \nMethods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this systematic review concentrated on full-text English literature published between 2014 and 2024. Editorials and review articles that appeared in the same journal as the submission were not accepted without a DOI. A number of websites, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, and SagePub, were utilized to gather the literature. \nResult: The study looked at more than 4,000 publications using reputable sources including Science Direct, SagePub, and PubMed. After it was decided that eight publications needed greater investigation, a more extensive review of the entire literature was carried out. \nConclusion: Studies have shown that osteoporosis can lead to fractures, with the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) testing being used to assess fracture risk in women. Studies have shown that bone anabolic treatments can reduce fracture risk, but the certainty of these results is low due to the small number of studies.","PeriodicalId":507661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425)","volume":"135 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Medical and Health Science (ISSN 2208-2425)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61841/nagrwm92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Microarchitecture degeneration and reduced bone mass, which increase fragility and fracture susceptibility, are hallmarks of osteoporosis, a systemic skeletal disorder. Disease has a substantial effect on fracture healing as well as bone mass and microstructure. More accurate fracture risk assessment and a wider range of treatment choices are the results of research advances. Effective treatment regimens for osteoporosis have been aided by the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), which has had a substantial impact on clinical decision-making and intervention levels. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this systematic review concentrated on full-text English literature published between 2014 and 2024. Editorials and review articles that appeared in the same journal as the submission were not accepted without a DOI. A number of websites, including ScienceDirect, PubMed, and SagePub, were utilized to gather the literature. Result: The study looked at more than 4,000 publications using reputable sources including Science Direct, SagePub, and PubMed. After it was decided that eight publications needed greater investigation, a more extensive review of the entire literature was carried out. Conclusion: Studies have shown that osteoporosis can lead to fractures, with the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) testing being used to assess fracture risk in women. Studies have shown that bone anabolic treatments can reduce fracture risk, but the certainty of these results is low due to the small number of studies.
骨质疏松症和骨折风险分析研究:十年系统回顾
背景:骨质疏松症是一种全身性骨骼疾病,其特征是微结构退化和骨量减少,从而增加了脆性和骨折的易感性。骨质疏松症对骨折愈合、骨量和微结构都有很大影响。研究的进步带来了更准确的骨折风险评估和更广泛的治疗选择。骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)为骨质疏松症的有效治疗方案提供了帮助,对临床决策和干预水平产生了重大影响。方法:根据 PRISMA 2020 指南,本系统性综述集中于 2014 年至 2024 年间发表的全文英文文献。不接受与投稿文章发表在同一期刊上的社论和综述文章,且不提供 DOI。我们利用了包括 ScienceDirect、PubMed 和 SagePub 在内的多个网站来收集文献。结果本研究利用 Science Direct、SagePub 和 PubMed 等著名资源查阅了 4000 多篇出版物。在确定有 8 篇出版物需要进一步调查后,对全部文献进行了更广泛的审查。结论研究表明,骨质疏松症可导致骨折,骨折风险评估工具 (FRAX) 和骨密度 (BMD) 测试可用于评估女性的骨折风险。研究表明,骨同化治疗可降低骨折风险,但由于研究数量较少,这些结果的确定性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信