Business Sustainability, Social Enablement, ESG, and Ethics: A Systematic Biliometric Review

Mohammad Irfan, Rui Dias, Varaprasad Goud, Kathari Santosh, Rosa Galvão, Miguel Varela
{"title":"Business Sustainability, Social Enablement, ESG, and Ethics: A Systematic Biliometric Review","authors":"Mohammad Irfan, Rui Dias, Varaprasad Goud, Kathari Santosh, Rosa Galvão, Miguel Varela","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study uses a bibliometric analysis of articles on sustainability dimensions in various ways to illustrate the current trends in business sustainability literature.\n \nTheoretical Framework: The concept of business sustainability has undergone significant development over time. Since the inception of the modern environmental movement and the implementation of environmental regulations during the 1970s, it has evolved into a strategic concern propelled by market forces.\n \nMethod: The study was centred on mapping of keywords, an analysis of bibliometric authors' citations, an analysis of bibliometric papers' citations, an analysis of co-citations in bibliometric references, a cartography of co-citations in journals, and an analysis of qualitative content. The data has been extracted from a dimensional database that covers a wide range of data. It was extracted from 2012 to 2023 and examined using bibliometric analytical tools.\n \nResults and Discussion: A total of 318 sustainability-related articles were examined. VOSviewer was used to conduct the bibliometric study. There were determined to be six primary clusters: Business Sustainability, Social Enablement, Environment Social Governance (ESG), The People Profit Planet, Corporate Sustainability, Economic Value, and Ethics. Based on the findings, a search was conducted on the keyword \"business sustainability\" in a bibliometric analysis of a database comprising 318 documents. Out of these, 112 were articles, 85 were book chapters, 46 were preprint publications, 55 were proceedings, and the remaining 20 were edited books.\n \nConclusion: Additionally, the findings show that the fields of social enablement, environmental sustainability governance (ESG), people-profit-planet (PPP), and corporate sustainability have seen a considerable increase in the number of research publications and citations, showing their significant contributions to the field of business sustainability study.","PeriodicalId":506347,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study uses a bibliometric analysis of articles on sustainability dimensions in various ways to illustrate the current trends in business sustainability literature.   Theoretical Framework: The concept of business sustainability has undergone significant development over time. Since the inception of the modern environmental movement and the implementation of environmental regulations during the 1970s, it has evolved into a strategic concern propelled by market forces.   Method: The study was centred on mapping of keywords, an analysis of bibliometric authors' citations, an analysis of bibliometric papers' citations, an analysis of co-citations in bibliometric references, a cartography of co-citations in journals, and an analysis of qualitative content. The data has been extracted from a dimensional database that covers a wide range of data. It was extracted from 2012 to 2023 and examined using bibliometric analytical tools.   Results and Discussion: A total of 318 sustainability-related articles were examined. VOSviewer was used to conduct the bibliometric study. There were determined to be six primary clusters: Business Sustainability, Social Enablement, Environment Social Governance (ESG), The People Profit Planet, Corporate Sustainability, Economic Value, and Ethics. Based on the findings, a search was conducted on the keyword "business sustainability" in a bibliometric analysis of a database comprising 318 documents. Out of these, 112 were articles, 85 were book chapters, 46 were preprint publications, 55 were proceedings, and the remaining 20 were edited books.   Conclusion: Additionally, the findings show that the fields of social enablement, environmental sustainability governance (ESG), people-profit-planet (PPP), and corporate sustainability have seen a considerable increase in the number of research publications and citations, showing their significant contributions to the field of business sustainability study.
商业可持续性、社会赋能、ESG 和道德:系统性计量经济学评论
目的:本研究采用文献计量学分析方法,从不同角度对有关可持续发展维度的文章进行分析,以说明当前商业可持续发展文献的发展趋势。理论框架:随着时间的推移,商业可持续性的概念经历了重大发展。自 20 世纪 70 年代现代环保运动兴起和环境法规实施以来,它已发展成为市场力量推动下的一种战略关注。研究方法:研究的核心是绘制关键词图谱、分析文献计量作者引文、分析文献计量论文引文、分析文献计量参考文献中的共引、绘制期刊共引图谱以及分析定性内容。数据是从一个涵盖广泛数据的维度数据库中提取的。数据提取时间为 2012 年至 2023 年,并使用文献计量分析工具进行了研究。结果与讨论:共研究了 318 篇与可持续性相关的文章。使用 VOSviewer 进行了文献计量学研究。确定了六个主要群组:商业可持续性、社会赋能、环境社会治理 (ESG)、人利星球、企业可持续性、经济价值和道德。根据研究结果,在对数据库中 318 篇文献进行文献计量分析时,以 "商业可持续性 "为关键词进行了搜索。其中 112 篇为文章,85 篇为书籍章节,46 篇为预印本出版物,55 篇为论文集,其余 20 篇为编辑书籍。研究结论此外,研究结果表明,社会赋能、环境可持续治理(ESG)、人-利-星球(PPP)和企业可持续发展等领域的研究出版物和引文数量都有大幅增长,这表明它们对商业可持续发展研究领域做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信