{"title":"Failure Analysis for Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering","authors":"Zhang Jing Bing, Wai Yie Leong","doi":"10.32802/asmscj.2023.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the failure of project-based learning, to help students analyse their main issue of project failure and develop better solutions. A Return on Failure analysis for Engineering Design courses has been developed in this study. The engineering design courses, which are often included in the first, second, and third years of undergraduate engineering courses at the School of Engineering, provide a distinctive setting for the practice of engineering project-based learning (PBL). The PBL is a commonly utilised method that can be used to accomplish two main educational objectives: confirming the theoretical concepts learned in previous disciplines and developing the professional qualities required for graduates, such as teamwork and good communication. We have incorporated the usage of Return on Failure analysis in project-based learning courses to improve the knowledge of project failure in order to further develop the students' failure analytical skills. Students are required to build the Ping-Pong Robot, a robot that can play ping-pong, as part of their \"Engineering Design & Communication\" project. It was a really multidisciplinary project because the skills and knowledge required not only robotics but also design, material selection, and engineering mechanics. From the first-year engineering students, more than 85 Return on Failure analyses were gathered. The failure analyses that were gathered were frequently used in undergraduate and graduate courses as surveys, teaching, and learning techniques.","PeriodicalId":38804,"journal":{"name":"ASM Science Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2023.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper analyses the failure of project-based learning, to help students analyse their main issue of project failure and develop better solutions. A Return on Failure analysis for Engineering Design courses has been developed in this study. The engineering design courses, which are often included in the first, second, and third years of undergraduate engineering courses at the School of Engineering, provide a distinctive setting for the practice of engineering project-based learning (PBL). The PBL is a commonly utilised method that can be used to accomplish two main educational objectives: confirming the theoretical concepts learned in previous disciplines and developing the professional qualities required for graduates, such as teamwork and good communication. We have incorporated the usage of Return on Failure analysis in project-based learning courses to improve the knowledge of project failure in order to further develop the students' failure analytical skills. Students are required to build the Ping-Pong Robot, a robot that can play ping-pong, as part of their "Engineering Design & Communication" project. It was a really multidisciplinary project because the skills and knowledge required not only robotics but also design, material selection, and engineering mechanics. From the first-year engineering students, more than 85 Return on Failure analyses were gathered. The failure analyses that were gathered were frequently used in undergraduate and graduate courses as surveys, teaching, and learning techniques.
期刊介绍:
The ASM Science Journal publishes advancements in the broad fields of medical, engineering, earth, mathematical, physical, chemical and agricultural sciences as well as ICT. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientists who subscribe to the fields listed above will be the source of papers to the journal. All articles will be reviewed by at least two experts in that particular field.