Failure Analysis for Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Zhang Jing Bing, Wai Yie Leong
{"title":"Failure Analysis for Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Engineering","authors":"Zhang Jing Bing, Wai Yie Leong","doi":"10.32802/asmscj.2023.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the failure of project-based learning, to help students analyse their main issue of project failure and develop better solutions. A Return on Failure analysis for Engineering Design courses has been developed in this study. The engineering design courses, which are often included in the first, second, and third years of undergraduate engineering courses at the School of Engineering, provide a distinctive setting for the practice of engineering project-based learning (PBL). The PBL is a commonly utilised method that can be used to accomplish two main educational objectives: confirming the theoretical concepts learned in previous disciplines and developing the professional qualities required for graduates, such as teamwork and good communication. We have incorporated the usage of Return on Failure analysis in project-based learning courses to improve the knowledge of project failure in order to further develop the students' failure analytical skills. Students are required to build the Ping-Pong Robot, a robot that can play ping-pong, as part of their \"Engineering Design & Communication\" project. It was a really multidisciplinary project because the skills and knowledge required not only robotics but also design, material selection, and engineering mechanics. From the first-year engineering students, more than 85 Return on Failure analyses were gathered. The failure analyses that were gathered were frequently used in undergraduate and graduate courses as surveys, teaching, and learning techniques.","PeriodicalId":38804,"journal":{"name":"ASM Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2023.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the failure of project-based learning, to help students analyse their main issue of project failure and develop better solutions. A Return on Failure analysis for Engineering Design courses has been developed in this study. The engineering design courses, which are often included in the first, second, and third years of undergraduate engineering courses at the School of Engineering, provide a distinctive setting for the practice of engineering project-based learning (PBL). The PBL is a commonly utilised method that can be used to accomplish two main educational objectives: confirming the theoretical concepts learned in previous disciplines and developing the professional qualities required for graduates, such as teamwork and good communication. We have incorporated the usage of Return on Failure analysis in project-based learning courses to improve the knowledge of project failure in order to further develop the students' failure analytical skills. Students are required to build the Ping-Pong Robot, a robot that can play ping-pong, as part of their "Engineering Design & Communication" project. It was a really multidisciplinary project because the skills and knowledge required not only robotics but also design, material selection, and engineering mechanics. From the first-year engineering students, more than 85 Return on Failure analyses were gathered. The failure analyses that were gathered were frequently used in undergraduate and graduate courses as surveys, teaching, and learning techniques.
工程学项目式学习 (PBL) 的故障分析
本文分析了项目式学习的失败原因,帮助学生分析项目失败的主要问题,并制定更好的解决方案。本研究开发了工程设计课程的失败回报分析。工程设计课程通常包含在工程学院本科工程学课程的一、二、三年级中,为工程学项目式学习(PBL)的实践提供了一个独特的环境。PBL 是一种常用的方法,可用于实现两个主要的教育目标:确认以前学科所学的理论概念和培养毕业生所需的专业素质,如团队合作和良好的沟通。我们将 "失败回报分析 "纳入项目式学习课程,提高学生对项目失败的认识,以进一步培养学生的失败分析能力。在 "工程设计与交流 "项目中,要求学生制作一个能打乒乓球的机器人--乒乓球机器人。这是一个真正的多学科项目,因为所需的技能和知识不仅包括机器人技术,还包括设计、材料选择和工程力学。从工程学一年级学生那里,收集到了超过 85 份《故障分析报告》。收集到的故障分析结果经常被用作本科生和研究生课程的调查、教学和学习技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASM Science Journal
ASM Science Journal Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The ASM Science Journal publishes advancements in the broad fields of medical, engineering, earth, mathematical, physical, chemical and agricultural sciences as well as ICT. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientific articles published will be on the basis of originality, importance and significant contribution to science, scientific research and the public. Scientists who subscribe to the fields listed above will be the source of papers to the journal. All articles will be reviewed by at least two experts in that particular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信