Palliative Care Fundamental Principles and Interdisciplinary Approaches

Tatiana de Lima Tanaka, Jeniffer da Silva Alencar Mendes, José Riccardo Ferrette Barreto, Jessica Thaynna Resende Figueiredo, Brenno Lira Sotolani, Carlos Nei Coquemala Júnior, Maria Eduarda Fideles Scaravonatti, Jennifer Freitas Galvão Gonçalves, Kamila de Oliveira Pinheiro Rodrigues, Pedro Henrique Vazão, Lígia Cristina Pagotto, Caroline Vaucher Rodrigues, Mateus Felipe Batista Rios, Herbert Gonçalves Krettli, Dávinna Nyara Lima Moura
{"title":"Palliative Care Fundamental Principles and Interdisciplinary Approaches","authors":"Tatiana de Lima Tanaka, Jeniffer da Silva Alencar Mendes, José Riccardo Ferrette Barreto, Jessica Thaynna Resende Figueiredo, Brenno Lira Sotolani, Carlos Nei Coquemala Júnior, Maria Eduarda Fideles Scaravonatti, Jennifer Freitas Galvão Gonçalves, Kamila de Oliveira Pinheiro Rodrigues, Pedro Henrique Vazão, Lígia Cristina Pagotto, Caroline Vaucher Rodrigues, Mateus Felipe Batista Rios, Herbert Gonçalves Krettli, Dávinna Nyara Lima Moura","doi":"10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This article aims to consolidate and synthesize existing knowledge on the fundamental principles and interdisciplinary approaches of palliative care, identifying gaps in literature and exploring collaborative improvements across medical specialties to enhance clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients in advanced disease stages.\n \nTheoretical Framework: Palliative care is essential for integrated patient management in serious illnesses, focusing on alleviating suffering and significantly enhancing quality of life.\n \nMethod: A systematic review was conducted using major scientific databases to gather relevant articles on palliative care, utilizing specific keywords to identify studies on its principles and interdisciplinary approaches. This facilitated the synthesis of effective practices and the identification of research gaps, supporting evidence-based clinical practices.\n \nResults and Discussion: The review highlights that interdisciplinary approaches in palliative care significantly improve patient quality of life by addressing medical and psychosocial needs. It also shows a strong correlation between early palliative care integration and improved outcomes for patients and families. However, gaps in practice uniformity and integration of non-medical support services suggest areas for future research and improvement.","PeriodicalId":506347,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to consolidate and synthesize existing knowledge on the fundamental principles and interdisciplinary approaches of palliative care, identifying gaps in literature and exploring collaborative improvements across medical specialties to enhance clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients in advanced disease stages.   Theoretical Framework: Palliative care is essential for integrated patient management in serious illnesses, focusing on alleviating suffering and significantly enhancing quality of life.   Method: A systematic review was conducted using major scientific databases to gather relevant articles on palliative care, utilizing specific keywords to identify studies on its principles and interdisciplinary approaches. This facilitated the synthesis of effective practices and the identification of research gaps, supporting evidence-based clinical practices.   Results and Discussion: The review highlights that interdisciplinary approaches in palliative care significantly improve patient quality of life by addressing medical and psychosocial needs. It also shows a strong correlation between early palliative care integration and improved outcomes for patients and families. However, gaps in practice uniformity and integration of non-medical support services suggest areas for future research and improvement.
姑息关怀的基本原则和跨学科方法
目的:本文旨在整合和归纳有关姑息关怀的基本原则和跨学科方法的现有知识,找出文献中的不足之处,并探索跨医学专业的合作改进,以提高晚期疾病患者的临床疗效和生活质量。理论框架:姑息关怀对于重症患者的综合管理至关重要,其重点是减轻痛苦并显著提高生活质量。方法:利用主要科学数据库进行系统性综述,收集有关姑息关怀的相关文章,利用特定关键词确定有关其原则和跨学科方法的研究。这有助于归纳有效的实践方法并找出研究缺口,从而为循证临床实践提供支持。结果与讨论:综述强调,姑息关怀中的跨学科方法通过满足医疗和社会心理需求,显著提高了患者的生活质量。综述还显示,早期姑息关怀整合与患者和家属的预后改善之间存在密切联系。然而,在实践的统一性和非医疗支持服务的整合方面还存在差距,这也是未来需要研究和改进的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信