Linguistic specifics of the category of interpretation in English-language news media texts

Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-14 DOI:10.30853/phil20240266

Irina Olegovna Syresina

{"title":"Linguistic specifics of the category of interpretation in English-language news media texts","authors":"Irina Olegovna Syresina","doi":"10.30853/phil20240266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to determine the specifics of the linguistic objectivation of the category of interpretation in modern English-language news media texts. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the presentation of interpretation as a discursive-dictemic category, the definition of its types and the identification of specific marking means of its linguistic objectivation in English-language news media texts. As a result, it is proved that, being an institutional type of discourse, the news media discourse has a certain organization for constructing its linguistic interpretation by the addressee to the addressee, namely, it is possible to distinguish an informing interpretation and an influencing (evaluative) interpretation. The informative interpretation is marked by the following linguistic means: at the lexical level – numerals (digital data), proper names; at the propositional level: polypredicative constructions, structural and logical means of cohesion; at the dictemic level, there are narrative and causal types of dictates. Influencing interpretation, when manipulating readers' beliefs, sets various pragmatic guidelines for news media texts. Namely, it is possible to distinguish between invasive and motivational interpretations, each of which is characterized by different linguistic means of objectivation.","PeriodicalId":415627,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"57 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the specifics of the linguistic objectivation of the category of interpretation in modern English-language news media texts. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the presentation of interpretation as a discursive-dictemic category, the definition of its types and the identification of specific marking means of its linguistic objectivation in English-language news media texts. As a result, it is proved that, being an institutional type of discourse, the news media discourse has a certain organization for constructing its linguistic interpretation by the addressee to the addressee, namely, it is possible to distinguish an informing interpretation and an influencing (evaluative) interpretation. The informative interpretation is marked by the following linguistic means: at the lexical level – numerals (digital data), proper names; at the propositional level: polypredicative constructions, structural and logical means of cohesion; at the dictemic level, there are narrative and causal types of dictates. Influencing interpretation, when manipulating readers' beliefs, sets various pragmatic guidelines for news media texts. Namely, it is possible to distinguish between invasive and motivational interpretations, each of which is characterized by different linguistic means of objectivation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

英语新闻媒体文本中口译类别的语言特性

本研究的目的是确定现代英语新闻媒体文本中阐释范畴语言客观化的具体情况。本研究的科学新颖性在于将阐释作为一种话语-语篇范畴，定义了其类型，并确定了其在英语新闻媒体文本中语言客观化的具体标记手段。结果证明，作为一种制度类型的话语，新闻媒体话语在构建受话人对受话人的语言阐释时具有一定的组织性，即可以区分告知性阐释和影响性（评价性）阐释。信息性阐释以下列语言手段为标志：在词法层面--数字（数字数据）、专有名词；在命题层面：多谓词结构、结构和逻辑内聚手段；在谓词层面，有叙事和因果类型的谓词。在操纵读者的信念时，影响解释为新闻媒体文本设定了各种实用准则。也就是说，可以将影响性阐释和动机性阐释区分开来，每种阐释都有不同的语言客观化手段。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice

自引率

0.00%

发文量