How compatible are the governing documents of Swedish authorities? A comparison between the Swedish National Agency for Education’s and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s competence requirements for elderly care staff – with a focus on norms and v

Åsa Kindevåg, Per Andersson
{"title":"How compatible are the governing documents of Swedish authorities? A comparison between the Swedish National Agency for Education’s and the National Board of Health and Welfare’s competence requirements for elderly care staff – with a focus on norms and v","authors":"Åsa Kindevåg, Per Andersson","doi":"10.7577/sjvd.5655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vocational education at upper secondary level in Sweden is conducted both in upper secondary school and in adult education. Among the vocational students in adult education over 40 percent choose to study a healthcare programme, with about half of these students being foreign-born. Both the education programme and the occupation of assistant nurse have undergone significant changes as part of the efforts to ensure the competence of the elderly care workforce. The political actors, the National Agency for Education and the National Board of Health and Welfare, issue binding regulations that the communities of practice, here the vocational education and the elderly care, are expected to follow. Based on these binding regulations, an inductive document analysis has been conducted with a focus on norms and values. The documents have been compared and subsequently the analysis has been deepened further using the theory of situated learning. The regulations of both communities of practice exhibit a considerable alignment regarding the knowledge and competence expected of assistant nurses, with some exceptions. The National Agency for Education and the National Board of Health and Welfare don’t always employ the same conceptual frameworks, which is reflected in the legal frameworks emphasized by the political actors in their respective regulations. With regards to culture, norms, and values the students are expected to learn about other cultures and how care recipients with different backgrounds should be approached, according to the regulations. This can be interpreted as an expectation that the students already possess knowledge of and have embraced the Swedish norms and values and can work accordingly.  One conclusion that can be drawn is that more knowledge is needed regarding where and how norms and values are brought forward and discussed within the communities of practice of adult education and elderly care. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":352503,"journal":{"name":"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling","volume":"20 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skandinavisk tidsskrift for yrker og profesjoner i utvikling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/sjvd.5655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vocational education at upper secondary level in Sweden is conducted both in upper secondary school and in adult education. Among the vocational students in adult education over 40 percent choose to study a healthcare programme, with about half of these students being foreign-born. Both the education programme and the occupation of assistant nurse have undergone significant changes as part of the efforts to ensure the competence of the elderly care workforce. The political actors, the National Agency for Education and the National Board of Health and Welfare, issue binding regulations that the communities of practice, here the vocational education and the elderly care, are expected to follow. Based on these binding regulations, an inductive document analysis has been conducted with a focus on norms and values. The documents have been compared and subsequently the analysis has been deepened further using the theory of situated learning. The regulations of both communities of practice exhibit a considerable alignment regarding the knowledge and competence expected of assistant nurses, with some exceptions. The National Agency for Education and the National Board of Health and Welfare don’t always employ the same conceptual frameworks, which is reflected in the legal frameworks emphasized by the political actors in their respective regulations. With regards to culture, norms, and values the students are expected to learn about other cultures and how care recipients with different backgrounds should be approached, according to the regulations. This can be interpreted as an expectation that the students already possess knowledge of and have embraced the Swedish norms and values and can work accordingly.  One conclusion that can be drawn is that more knowledge is needed regarding where and how norms and values are brought forward and discussed within the communities of practice of adult education and elderly care.    
瑞典政府管理文件的兼容性如何?瑞典国家教育署和国家卫生与福利局对养老护理人员能力要求的比较--重点关注规范和 v
瑞典高中阶段的职业教育在高中和成人教育中都有开展。在成人教育的职业学生中,有 40% 以上选择学习医疗保健课程,其中约有一半是外国出生的学生。为了确保老年护理人员队伍的能力,教育计划和助理护士职业都发生了重大变化。国家教育部和国家卫生与福利委员会这两个政治行为体发布了具有约束力的规定,职业教育和老年护理这两个实践领域都应遵守这些规定。根据这些具有约束力的规定,我们对文件进行了归纳分析,重点是规范和价值观。我们对文件进行了比较,随后利用情景学习理论进一步深化了分析。除个别情况外,两个实践社区的规定在助理护士应具备的知识和能力方面表现出相当大的一致性。国家教育署和国家卫生与福利委员会并不总是采用相同的概念框架,这反映在政治行为者在各自法规中所强调的法律框架中。在文化、规范和价值观方面,根据规定,学生应了解其他文化,以及应如何对待不同背景的护理对象。这可以被理解为一种期望,即学生们已经了解并接受了瑞典的规范和价值观,并能据此开展工作。 可以得出的一个结论是,对于在成人教育和老年人护理的实践社区中提出和讨论规范和价值观的地点和方式,还需要更多的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信