Concentration and purity of DNA extraction with sonication and spin column methods from the sputum sample of tuberculosis patient

Fitrianingsih Saputra, Asep Iin Nur Indra, Ai Djuminar, Fusvita Merdekawati, Betty Nurhayati
{"title":"Concentration and purity of DNA extraction with sonication and spin column methods from the sputum sample of tuberculosis patient","authors":"Fitrianingsih Saputra, Asep Iin Nur Indra, Ai Djuminar, Fusvita Merdekawati, Betty Nurhayati","doi":"10.29244/currbiomed.2.2.84-92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method can identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a sputum sample of a patient with TB (TB). One crucial step to ensure accurate PCR results is the DNA extraction process. Objective: The research aims to compare the concentration and purity of DNA from the sputum of TB patients using ultrasound and spin column extraction techniques. Methods: The research uses descriptive study designs with post-only design strategies. The primary data was derived from 18 sputum specimens from TB patients. Concentration measurement and DNA purity testing using a nanodrop spectroscopic photometer. Results: DNA extraction by ultrasound method has an average concentration of 18.9 ± 8.5 ng/L, with a peak of 37.6 ng/ L. The spin column method produces an average of 55.5 ± 27.9 ng/μL; the peak is 105.0 ng/ μL. The purity value of the DNA extract is in the range of 1.8 ± 2.0 with the ultrasound method of 61% and the spin column of 78%. Conclusion: The sonication method has a lower average concentration and a higher percentage of purity than the spin column method, and there are differences in concentrations and purity values between the two methods.","PeriodicalId":470424,"journal":{"name":"Current Biomedicine","volume":"8 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/currbiomed.2.2.84-92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) method can identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a sputum sample of a patient with TB (TB). One crucial step to ensure accurate PCR results is the DNA extraction process. Objective: The research aims to compare the concentration and purity of DNA from the sputum of TB patients using ultrasound and spin column extraction techniques. Methods: The research uses descriptive study designs with post-only design strategies. The primary data was derived from 18 sputum specimens from TB patients. Concentration measurement and DNA purity testing using a nanodrop spectroscopic photometer. Results: DNA extraction by ultrasound method has an average concentration of 18.9 ± 8.5 ng/L, with a peak of 37.6 ng/ L. The spin column method produces an average of 55.5 ± 27.9 ng/μL; the peak is 105.0 ng/ μL. The purity value of the DNA extract is in the range of 1.8 ± 2.0 with the ultrasound method of 61% and the spin column of 78%. Conclusion: The sonication method has a lower average concentration and a higher percentage of purity than the spin column method, and there are differences in concentrations and purity values between the two methods.
从肺结核患者痰液样本中用超声法和旋柱法提取 DNA 的浓度和纯度
背景:聚合酶链式反应(PCR)方法可以从肺结核(TB)患者的痰液样本中鉴定结核分枝杆菌。确保 PCR 结果准确的一个关键步骤是 DNA 提取过程。研究目的本研究旨在比较使用超声波和旋柱提取技术从肺结核患者痰液中提取 DNA 的浓度和纯度。研究方法本研究采用描述性研究设计和仅后设计策略。主要数据来自 18 份肺结核患者的痰液标本。使用纳洛德罗光谱光度计进行浓度测量和 DNA 纯度检测。结果显示超声法提取 DNA 的平均浓度为 18.9 ± 8.5 ng/L,峰值为 37.6 ng/L;旋光柱法提取 DNA 的平均浓度为 55.5 ± 27.9 ng/μL,峰值为 105.0 ng/μL。DNA 提取物的纯度值在 1.8 ± 2.0 之间,其中超声法为 61%,旋光柱法为 78%。结论与旋柱法相比,超声法的平均浓度较低,纯度百分比较高,两种方法的浓度和纯度值存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信