Outcomes of simultaneous left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Hasaan Ahmed, Mahmoud Ismayl, Anirudh Palicherla, Anthony Kashou, Jalal Dufani, Amjad Kabach, Andrew M. Goldsweig, N. Anavekar, A. Aboeata
{"title":"Outcomes of simultaneous left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement","authors":"Hasaan Ahmed, Mahmoud Ismayl, Anirudh Palicherla, Anthony Kashou, Jalal Dufani, Amjad Kabach, Andrew M. Goldsweig, N. Anavekar, A. Aboeata","doi":"10.1097/ms9.0000000000002245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are at an elevated risk for bleeding and stroke. We aim to evaluate clinical outcomes of concomitant TAVR and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) versus isolated TAVR in patients with AF.\n \n \n \n We searched several databases for studies comparing concomitant TAVR and LAAC procedures versus isolated TAVR in patients with AF. We used a common-effect model to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals in R studio. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, major vascular complications, and ischemic stroke.\n \n \n \n A total of 3 studies were identified consisting of 482 patients, of which 239 underwent TAVR with LAAC and 243 underwent isolated TAVR. All-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.64 - 1.38), major bleeding (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.77 - 1.81), and ischemic stroke (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.38 - 1.80) were similar between both groups. Concomitant TAVR with LAAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of major vascular complications (RR 5.44; 95% CI 1.77 - 16.71) compared to isolated TAVR.\n \n \n \n Our findings suggest that patients undergoing concomitant TAVR with LAAC had an increased risk of major vascular complications when compared to those undergoing isolated TAVR. Additionally, ischemic stroke, mortality, and major bleeding were noted to be similar among patients who underwent concomitant TAVR with LAAC compared to those who underwent isolated TAVR. Further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.\n","PeriodicalId":373451,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","volume":"12 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ms9.0000000000002245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with aortic stenosis who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are at an elevated risk for bleeding and stroke. We aim to evaluate clinical outcomes of concomitant TAVR and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) versus isolated TAVR in patients with AF. We searched several databases for studies comparing concomitant TAVR and LAAC procedures versus isolated TAVR in patients with AF. We used a common-effect model to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals in R studio. Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, major vascular complications, and ischemic stroke. A total of 3 studies were identified consisting of 482 patients, of which 239 underwent TAVR with LAAC and 243 underwent isolated TAVR. All-cause mortality (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.64 - 1.38), major bleeding (RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.77 - 1.81), and ischemic stroke (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.38 - 1.80) were similar between both groups. Concomitant TAVR with LAAC was associated with a significantly increased risk of major vascular complications (RR 5.44; 95% CI 1.77 - 16.71) compared to isolated TAVR. Our findings suggest that patients undergoing concomitant TAVR with LAAC had an increased risk of major vascular complications when compared to those undergoing isolated TAVR. Additionally, ischemic stroke, mortality, and major bleeding were noted to be similar among patients who underwent concomitant TAVR with LAAC compared to those who underwent isolated TAVR. Further studies are indicated to confirm our findings.
接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的心房颤动患者同时关闭左房阑尾的效果
接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的主动脉瓣狭窄房颤(AF)患者出血和中风的风险较高。我们旨在评估房颤患者同时接受 TAVR 和左心房阑尾关闭术(LAAC)与单独接受 TAVR 的临床效果。 我们在多个数据库中搜索了房颤患者同时进行 TAVR 和 LAAC 与单独进行 TAVR 的比较研究。我们使用共同效应模型计算风险比 (RR),R studio 中的置信区间为 95%。评估的结果包括全因死亡率、大出血、主要血管并发症和缺血性卒中。 共确定了 3 项研究,包括 482 名患者,其中 239 人接受了带 LAAC 的 TAVR,243 人接受了单独的 TAVR。两组患者的全因死亡率(RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.64 - 1.38)、大出血(RR 1.18; 95% CI 0.77 - 1.81)和缺血性卒中(RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.38 - 1.80)相似。与单独的 TAVR 相比,同时进行 TAVR 和 LAAC 的患者发生主要血管并发症的风险显著增加(RR 5.44;95% CI 1.77 - 16.71)。 我们的研究结果表明,与单独接受 TAVR 的患者相比,同时接受 TAVR 和 LAAC 的患者发生主要血管并发症的风险更高。此外,与接受单独 TAVR 的患者相比,同时接受 LAAC TAVR 的患者缺血性中风、死亡率和大出血的发生率相似。为了证实我们的研究结果,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信