Effect of Patient's Symptom Interpretation on In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-25 Epub Date: 2024-06-15 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0113
Ryo Ninomiya, Yorihiko Koeda, Takahito Nasu, Masaru Ishida, Reisuke Yoshizawa, Yu Ishikawa, Tomonori Itoh, Yoshihiro Morino, Hidenori Saito, Hiroyuki Onodera, Tetsuji Nozaki, Yuko Maegawa, Osamu Nishiyama, Mahito Ozawa, Takuya Osaki, Akihiro Nakamura
{"title":"Effect of Patient's Symptom Interpretation on In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Ryo Ninomiya, Yorihiko Koeda, Takahito Nasu, Masaru Ishida, Reisuke Yoshizawa, Yu Ishikawa, Tomonori Itoh, Yoshihiro Morino, Hidenori Saito, Hiroyuki Onodera, Tetsuji Nozaki, Yuko Maegawa, Osamu Nishiyama, Mahito Ozawa, Takuya Osaki, Akihiro Nakamura","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between symptom interpretation and prognosis has not been investigated well among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). As such, the present study evaluated the effect of heart disease awareness among patients with ACS on in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We performed a post hoc analysis of 1,979 consecutive patients with ASC with confirmed symptom interpretation on admission between 2014 and 2018, focusing on patient characteristics, recanalization time, and clinical outcomes. Upon admission, 1,264 patients interpreted their condition as cardiac disease, whereas 715 did not interpret their condition as cardiac disease. Although no significant difference was observed in door-to-balloon time between the 2 groups, onset-to-balloon time was significantly shorter among those who interpreted their condition as cardiac disease (254 vs. 345 min; P<0.001). Moreover, the hazard ratio (HR) for in-hospital mortality was significantly higher among those who did not interpret their condition as cardiac disease based on the Cox regression model adjusted for established risk factors (HR 1.73; 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.76; P=0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that prehospital symptom interpretation was significantly associated with in-hospital clinical outcomes among patients with ACS. Moreover, the observed differences in clinical prognosis were not related to door-to-balloon time, but may be related to onset-to-balloon time.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0113","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between symptom interpretation and prognosis has not been investigated well among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). As such, the present study evaluated the effect of heart disease awareness among patients with ACS on in-hospital mortality.

Methods and results: We performed a post hoc analysis of 1,979 consecutive patients with ASC with confirmed symptom interpretation on admission between 2014 and 2018, focusing on patient characteristics, recanalization time, and clinical outcomes. Upon admission, 1,264 patients interpreted their condition as cardiac disease, whereas 715 did not interpret their condition as cardiac disease. Although no significant difference was observed in door-to-balloon time between the 2 groups, onset-to-balloon time was significantly shorter among those who interpreted their condition as cardiac disease (254 vs. 345 min; P<0.001). Moreover, the hazard ratio (HR) for in-hospital mortality was significantly higher among those who did not interpret their condition as cardiac disease based on the Cox regression model adjusted for established risk factors (HR 1.73; 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.76; P=0.022).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that prehospital symptom interpretation was significantly associated with in-hospital clinical outcomes among patients with ACS. Moreover, the observed differences in clinical prognosis were not related to door-to-balloon time, but may be related to onset-to-balloon time.

患者对症状的解释对急性冠状动脉综合征住院死亡率的影响
背景:急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的症状解释与预后之间的关系尚未得到很好的研究。因此,本研究评估了急性冠状动脉综合征患者的心脏病意识对院内死亡率的影响:我们对 2014 年至 2018 年间入院时症状解释确诊的 1,979 例连续 ASC 患者进行了事后分析,重点关注患者特征、再通时间和临床结局。入院时,1264 名患者将病情解释为心脏病,而 715 名患者未将病情解释为心脏病。虽然两组患者从入院到气囊形成的时间没有明显差异,但将病情解释为心脏病的患者从发病到气囊形成的时间明显更短(254 分钟对 345 分钟;PC 结论:本研究表明,院前症状解释与 ACS 患者的院内临床预后密切相关。此外,观察到的临床预后差异与 "门到气球 "时间无关,但可能与 "发病到气球 "时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信