{"title":"Grace period of human mortality has declined for over a century","authors":"Stefano Giaimo","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.24117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Human mortality is U-shaped and, therefore, defines an age <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> separating lives with an overall negative net change in mortality from lives with an overall positive net change in mortality. How has age <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> changed, also relatively to life expectancy, over recent human history? And how does <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> compare between humans and other primates, the mortality of which is also U-shaped?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Modeling data from the Human Mortality Database, the historical change of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> in advanced economies is reported and compared with that of primates in wild and captive conditions the demography of which was already modeled in the literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In humans, a marked decline in <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> for both sexes, also relatively to their life expectancy, is associated with medical and economic progress. Comparing wild with captive conditions in nonhuman primates, magnitude, and direction of the change in <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>, both relatively to life expectancy and absolutely, can depend on genus and sex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With medical and economic progress, human lives have transitioned from a negative to a positive net change in mortality independently of sex. There is no evidence of an analogous transition occurring in other primates when their environment is made more benign.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50809,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Human Biology","volume":"36 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajhb.24117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.24117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Human mortality is U-shaped and, therefore, defines an age separating lives with an overall negative net change in mortality from lives with an overall positive net change in mortality. How has age changed, also relatively to life expectancy, over recent human history? And how does compare between humans and other primates, the mortality of which is also U-shaped?
Methods
Modeling data from the Human Mortality Database, the historical change of in advanced economies is reported and compared with that of primates in wild and captive conditions the demography of which was already modeled in the literature.
Results
In humans, a marked decline in for both sexes, also relatively to their life expectancy, is associated with medical and economic progress. Comparing wild with captive conditions in nonhuman primates, magnitude, and direction of the change in , both relatively to life expectancy and absolutely, can depend on genus and sex.
Conclusions
With medical and economic progress, human lives have transitioned from a negative to a positive net change in mortality independently of sex. There is no evidence of an analogous transition occurring in other primates when their environment is made more benign.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Human Biology is the Official Journal of the Human Biology Association.
The American Journal of Human Biology is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed, internationally circulated journal that publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles and timely reviews, and brief communications in the interdisciplinary field of human biology. As the official journal of the Human Biology Association, the Journal also publishes abstracts of research presented at its annual scientific meeting and book reviews relevant to the field.
The Journal seeks scholarly manuscripts that address all aspects of human biology, health, and disease, particularly those that stress comparative, developmental, ecological, or evolutionary perspectives. The transdisciplinary areas covered in the Journal include, but are not limited to, epidemiology, genetic variation, population biology and demography, physiology, anatomy, nutrition, growth and aging, physical performance, physical activity and fitness, ecology, and evolution, along with their interactions. The Journal publishes basic, applied, and methodologically oriented research from all areas, including measurement, analytical techniques and strategies, and computer applications in human biology.
Like many other biologically oriented disciplines, the field of human biology has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years, and the expansion of the aims and scope of the Journal is a reflection of this growth and membership diversification.
The Journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscripts of unusual interest.