Does Adjunctive Prophylactic Intracoronary Infusion of Low Dose Alteplase Prevent No-Reflow Phenomenon During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohammad Hashemi, Jalal Ostovan, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Ehsan Shirvani, Ali Safaei, Shahin Sanaei
{"title":"Does Adjunctive Prophylactic Intracoronary Infusion of Low Dose Alteplase Prevent No-Reflow Phenomenon During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?","authors":"Mohammad Hashemi, Jalal Ostovan, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Ehsan Shirvani, Ali Safaei, Shahin Sanaei","doi":"10.48305/arya.2023.41614.2890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard approach to restore blood flow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, the no-reflow phenomenon as a potential complication of PPCI can worsen the outcomes. It has been hypothesized that adjunctive prophylactic intracoronary infusion of low-dose fibrinolytic might improve the PPCI outcomes; however, this theory is a matter of debate. The current study aims to investigate the value of adjunctive prophylactic intracoronary low-dose alteplase to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This case-control study was conducted on 80 STEMI patients who underwent PPCI. The patients were assigned into the case group who were intervened by 10 mg adjunctive intracoronary alteplase immediately at the end of the balloon angioplasty (n=40) and controls (n=40) who underwent conventional PPCI only. The angioplasty-associated outcomes including final TIMI score, need for no-reflow treatment, ST-segment resolution, post-PPCI complications, and death were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Alteplase use was accompanied by significantly improved final TIMI flow scores (P-value<0.001) and fewer requirements for no-reflow treatments (P-value<0.001); however, it did not improve the ST-segment resolution (P-value=0.491). The mortality rate and post-angioplasty complications did not differ between the groups (P-value>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the findings of this study, adjunctive infusion of low-dose intracoronary alteplase during PPCI could not efficiently prevent the no-reflow phenomenon. Although the final TIMI flow and need for post-stenting no-reflow treatment improved, ST-segment resolution did not occur dramatically. Given that, this approach requires further investigations and should be considered cautiously.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2023.41614.2890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the gold standard approach to restore blood flow in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, the no-reflow phenomenon as a potential complication of PPCI can worsen the outcomes. It has been hypothesized that adjunctive prophylactic intracoronary infusion of low-dose fibrinolytic might improve the PPCI outcomes; however, this theory is a matter of debate. The current study aims to investigate the value of adjunctive prophylactic intracoronary low-dose alteplase to prevent the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with STEMI.

Method: This case-control study was conducted on 80 STEMI patients who underwent PPCI. The patients were assigned into the case group who were intervened by 10 mg adjunctive intracoronary alteplase immediately at the end of the balloon angioplasty (n=40) and controls (n=40) who underwent conventional PPCI only. The angioplasty-associated outcomes including final TIMI score, need for no-reflow treatment, ST-segment resolution, post-PPCI complications, and death were compared between the groups.

Results: Alteplase use was accompanied by significantly improved final TIMI flow scores (P-value<0.001) and fewer requirements for no-reflow treatments (P-value<0.001); however, it did not improve the ST-segment resolution (P-value=0.491). The mortality rate and post-angioplasty complications did not differ between the groups (P-value>0.05).

Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, adjunctive infusion of low-dose intracoronary alteplase during PPCI could not efficiently prevent the no-reflow phenomenon. Although the final TIMI flow and need for post-stenting no-reflow treatment improved, ST-segment resolution did not occur dramatically. Given that, this approach requires further investigations and should be considered cautiously.

辅助性预防性冠状动脉内输注低剂量阿替普酶是否能预防原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗过程中的无回流现象?
导言:原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是恢复 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)血流的金标准方法。有人假设,辅助性预防性冠状动脉内输注低剂量纤溶药物可能会改善 PPCI 的疗效,但这一理论还存在争议。本研究旨在探讨 STEMI 患者辅助预防性冠脉内输注低剂量阿替普酶对防止无复流现象的价值:这项病例对照研究针对80名接受了PPCI的STEMI患者。这些患者被分为病例组(40 人)和对照组(40 人),前者在球囊血管成形术结束后立即接受 10 毫克辅助性冠脉内阿替普酶干预,后者仅接受传统的 PPCI。两组患者的血管成形术相关结果进行了比较,包括最终TIMI评分、无回流治疗需求、ST段缓解、PPCI术后并发症和死亡:结果:使用阿替普酶后,最终的 TIMI 血流评分明显改善(P 值为 0.05):结论:根据本研究结果,在 PPCI 期间辅助输注低剂量冠脉内阿替普酶并不能有效防止无复流现象。虽然最终的 TIMI 血流和支架术后无复流治疗的需求有所改善,但 ST 段并未显著缓解。有鉴于此,这种方法需要进一步研究,应谨慎考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信