The Effects of the Obesity Paradox and In-Hospital and One-Year Outcomes in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): Results From a STEMI Registry.

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mina Sharbati, Reza Heidarimoghadam, Mohammad Rouzbahani, Nahid Salehi, Nafiseh Montazeri, Javad Azimivaghar, Sousan Mahmoudi, Alireza Rai
{"title":"The Effects of the Obesity Paradox and In-Hospital and One-Year Outcomes in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): Results From a STEMI Registry.","authors":"Mina Sharbati, Reza Heidarimoghadam, Mohammad Rouzbahani, Nahid Salehi, Nafiseh Montazeri, Javad Azimivaghar, Sousan Mahmoudi, Alireza Rai","doi":"10.48305/arya.2022.26592.2811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is strongly associated with increased cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. However, numerous studies have suggested the existence of an \"obesity paradox\" in which overweight and mildly obese patients often exhibit a better outcome than their leaner counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the association between BMI and in-hospital and one-year outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This hospital-based research was conducted as a part of the Kermanshah STEMI Registry. Following the application of inclusion criteria, a total of 2,397 STEMI patients were evaluated. The data were collected using a standardized case report developed by the European Observational Registry Program (EORP). Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m<sup>2</sup>) was classified into underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), class I/mild obese (30-34.9), and class II/extreme obese (≥35) categories. The independent predictors of the in-hospital and one-year outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 2397 patients, 43 (1.79%) were underweight, 934 (38.97%) were normal, 1038 (43.30%) were overweight, 322 (13.43%) were class I obese, and 60 (2.50%) were class II obese. The results of the crude analysis showed that class I obesity was protective against CV death (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.84), MACE3 (MI, stroke, and death) (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29-0.76), and MACE5 (MACE3 plus unstable angina and heart failure) (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multivariate adjustment eliminated the protective effect of class I obesity against death and MACE events. Therefore, it is possible that this protective effect does not exist and instead reflects the impact of confounding variables such as age.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11066781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.26592.2811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is strongly associated with increased cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. However, numerous studies have suggested the existence of an "obesity paradox" in which overweight and mildly obese patients often exhibit a better outcome than their leaner counterparts. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the association between BMI and in-hospital and one-year outcomes.

Method: This hospital-based research was conducted as a part of the Kermanshah STEMI Registry. Following the application of inclusion criteria, a total of 2,397 STEMI patients were evaluated. The data were collected using a standardized case report developed by the European Observational Registry Program (EORP). Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2) was classified into underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), class I/mild obese (30-34.9), and class II/extreme obese (≥35) categories. The independent predictors of the in-hospital and one-year outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: Out of the 2397 patients, 43 (1.79%) were underweight, 934 (38.97%) were normal, 1038 (43.30%) were overweight, 322 (13.43%) were class I obese, and 60 (2.50%) were class II obese. The results of the crude analysis showed that class I obesity was protective against CV death (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.30-0.84), MACE3 (MI, stroke, and death) (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29-0.76), and MACE5 (MACE3 plus unstable angina and heart failure) (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.44-0.79).

Conclusions: Multivariate adjustment eliminated the protective effect of class I obesity against death and MACE events. Therefore, it is possible that this protective effect does not exist and instead reflects the impact of confounding variables such as age.

肥胖悖论与ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的院内和一年预后的影响:STEMI登记的结果。
背景:肥胖与心血管疾病(CVD)和心血管风险因素(如糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常)的增加密切相关。然而,许多研究表明存在 "肥胖悖论",即超重和轻度肥胖患者的预后往往优于瘦弱患者。因此,本研究旨在描述体重指数与住院及一年预后之间的关系:这项基于医院的研究是克尔曼沙赫 STEMI 登记的一部分。根据纳入标准,共对 2397 名 STEMI 患者进行了评估。数据收集采用了欧洲观察登记计划(EORP)开发的标准化病例报告。体重指数(BMI)(kg/m2)被划分为体重过轻(结果:体重过轻的患者中,43%为体重过轻:在 2397 名患者中,43 人(1.79%)体重不足,934 人(38.97%)正常,1038 人(43.30%)超重,322 人(13.43%)I 级肥胖,60 人(2.50%)II 级肥胖。粗略分析结果显示,I级肥胖对冠心病死亡(OR 0.50;95% CI 0.30-0.84)、MACE3(心肌梗死、中风和死亡)(OR 0.47;95% CI 0.29-0.76)和MACE5(MACE3加上不稳定型心绞痛和心力衰竭)(OR 0.59;95% CI 0.44-0.79)具有保护作用:多变量调整消除了I级肥胖对死亡和MACE事件的保护作用。因此,这种保护作用可能并不存在,而是反映了年龄等混杂变量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信