Effects of an Experiential Learning Curriculum on Systems-Thinking.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Kelly Kovaric, Gareth Gingell
{"title":"Effects of an Experiential Learning Curriculum on Systems-Thinking.","authors":"Kelly Kovaric, Gareth Gingell","doi":"10.1177/23821205241262210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Though health systems science (HSS) is referred to as the third pillar of medical education along with the pillars of basic science and clinical care, the effects of learning theories used to teach components of HSS including quality improvement/ patient safety (QI/PS), are poorly understood. Experiential learning theory is often referenced in QI/ PS education but its effects on QI/PS education are not well-described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of teaching QI using experiential learning theory on resident systems-thinking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was gathered from 30 resident participants in a 3-h QI workshop designed using experiential learning theory. Using a mixed-methods design, aspects of learner systems-thinking were analyzed both before and after the workshop. Learners were asked about their confidence in systems-thinking behaviors, and their QI plans were evaluated qualitatively for themes as well as quantitatively via the QIKAT-R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant increase in self-reported confidence in systems-thinking behaviors post-workshop. Odds ratio of the QI aim statement focusing on the systems-level of the problem after the workshop was 41.4 with a 95% CI of 8.9142 to 192.2721, p-value .0001. Thematic analysis of QI plans revealed a change in residents' thinking about healthcare problems. They shifted from attributing problems to individual actors to thinking about the problem as lying in the interaction between systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Experiential learning theory can be an effective framework for QI to transform learners into systems-thinkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205241262210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241262210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Though health systems science (HSS) is referred to as the third pillar of medical education along with the pillars of basic science and clinical care, the effects of learning theories used to teach components of HSS including quality improvement/ patient safety (QI/PS), are poorly understood. Experiential learning theory is often referenced in QI/ PS education but its effects on QI/PS education are not well-described.

Objective: To examine the effects of teaching QI using experiential learning theory on resident systems-thinking.

Methods: Data was gathered from 30 resident participants in a 3-h QI workshop designed using experiential learning theory. Using a mixed-methods design, aspects of learner systems-thinking were analyzed both before and after the workshop. Learners were asked about their confidence in systems-thinking behaviors, and their QI plans were evaluated qualitatively for themes as well as quantitatively via the QIKAT-R.

Results: There was a significant increase in self-reported confidence in systems-thinking behaviors post-workshop. Odds ratio of the QI aim statement focusing on the systems-level of the problem after the workshop was 41.4 with a 95% CI of 8.9142 to 192.2721, p-value .0001. Thematic analysis of QI plans revealed a change in residents' thinking about healthcare problems. They shifted from attributing problems to individual actors to thinking about the problem as lying in the interaction between systems.

Conclusion: Experiential learning theory can be an effective framework for QI to transform learners into systems-thinkers.

体验式学习课程对系统思维的影响。
导言:尽管卫生系统科学(HSS)与基础科学和临床护理并称为医学教育的第三大支柱,但人们对用于教授卫生系统科学组成部分(包括质量改进/患者安全(QI/PS))的学习理论的效果却知之甚少。体验式学习理论在质量改进/患者安全教育中经常被引用,但其对质量改进/患者安全教育的影响却没有得到很好的描述:目的:研究使用体验式学习理论进行 QI 教学对住院医师系统思维的影响:方法:30 名住院医师参加了利用体验式学习理论设计的 3 小时 QI 研讨班,并从中收集了数据。采用混合方法设计,在研讨会前后对学员系统思维的各个方面进行了分析。学员们被问及他们对系统思维行为的信心,他们的质量改进计划也通过 QIKAT-R 进行了定性和定量评估:结果:研修班结束后,自我报告的系统思维行为信心有了明显提高。研修班结束后,QI 目标声明侧重于问题的系统层面的几率比为 41.4,95% CI 为 8.9142 到 192.2721,P 值为 0.0001。对质量改进计划的主题分析表明,居民对医疗保健问题的思考发生了变化。他们从将问题归咎于个体行为者转变为认为问题在于系统之间的相互作用:结论:体验式学习理论可以作为质量改进的有效框架,将学习者转变为系统思考者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信