CT and MRI radiomic features of lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison and software consistency.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chandra Bortolotto, Alessandra Pinto, Francesca Brero, Gaia Messana, Raffaella Fiamma Cabini, Ian Postuma, Agnese Robustelli Test, Giulia Maria Stella, Giulia Galli, Manuel Mariani, Silvia Figini, Alessandro Lascialfari, Andrea Riccardo Filippi, Olivia Maria Bottinelli, Lorenzo Preda
{"title":"CT and MRI radiomic features of lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison and software consistency.","authors":"Chandra Bortolotto, Alessandra Pinto, Francesca Brero, Gaia Messana, Raffaella Fiamma Cabini, Ian Postuma, Agnese Robustelli Test, Giulia Maria Stella, Giulia Galli, Manuel Mariani, Silvia Figini, Alessandro Lascialfari, Andrea Riccardo Filippi, Olivia Maria Bottinelli, Lorenzo Preda","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00468-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiomics is a quantitative approach that allows the extraction of mineable data from medical images. Despite the growing clinical interest, radiomics studies are affected by variability stemming from analysis choices. We aimed to investigate the agreement between two open-source radiomics software for both contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lung cancers and to preliminarily evaluate the existence of radiomic features stable for both techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI images of 35 patients affected with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were manually segmented and preprocessed using three different methods. Sixty-six Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative-compliant features common to the considered platforms, PyRadiomics and LIFEx, were extracted. The correlation among features with the same mathematical definition was analyzed by comparing PyRadiomics and LIFEx (at fixed imaging technique), and MRI with CT results (for the same software).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing the agreement between LIFEx and PyRadiomics across the considered resampling, the maximum statistically significant correlations were observed to be 94% for CT features and 95% for MRI ones. When examining the correlation between features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT and MRI using the same software, higher significant correspondences were identified in 11% of features for both software.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering NSCLC, (i) for both imaging techniques, LIFEx and PyRadiomics agreed on average for 90% of features, with MRI being more affected by resampling and (ii) CT and MRI contained mostly non-redundant information, but there are shape features and, more importantly, texture features that can be singled out by both techniques.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>Identifying and selecting features that are stable cross-modalities may be one of the strategies to pave the way for radiomics clinical translation.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• More than 90% of LIFEx and PyRadiomics features contain the same information. • Ten percent of features (shape, texture) are stable among contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. • Software compliance and cross-modalities stability features are impacted by the resampling method.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00468-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiomics is a quantitative approach that allows the extraction of mineable data from medical images. Despite the growing clinical interest, radiomics studies are affected by variability stemming from analysis choices. We aimed to investigate the agreement between two open-source radiomics software for both contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lung cancers and to preliminarily evaluate the existence of radiomic features stable for both techniques.

Methods: Contrast-enhanced CT and MRI images of 35 patients affected with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were manually segmented and preprocessed using three different methods. Sixty-six Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative-compliant features common to the considered platforms, PyRadiomics and LIFEx, were extracted. The correlation among features with the same mathematical definition was analyzed by comparing PyRadiomics and LIFEx (at fixed imaging technique), and MRI with CT results (for the same software).

Results: When assessing the agreement between LIFEx and PyRadiomics across the considered resampling, the maximum statistically significant correlations were observed to be 94% for CT features and 95% for MRI ones. When examining the correlation between features extracted from contrast-enhanced CT and MRI using the same software, higher significant correspondences were identified in 11% of features for both software.

Conclusions: Considering NSCLC, (i) for both imaging techniques, LIFEx and PyRadiomics agreed on average for 90% of features, with MRI being more affected by resampling and (ii) CT and MRI contained mostly non-redundant information, but there are shape features and, more importantly, texture features that can be singled out by both techniques.

Relevance statement: Identifying and selecting features that are stable cross-modalities may be one of the strategies to pave the way for radiomics clinical translation.

Key points: • More than 90% of LIFEx and PyRadiomics features contain the same information. • Ten percent of features (shape, texture) are stable among contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. • Software compliance and cross-modalities stability features are impacted by the resampling method.

Abstract Image

肺癌(NSCLC)的 CT 和 MRI 放射特征:比较与软件一致性。
背景:放射组学是一种定量方法,可从医学影像中提取可挖掘的数据。尽管临床兴趣与日俱增,但放射组学研究却受到分析选择所产生的变异性的影响。我们旨在研究两种开源放射组学软件在对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT)和对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)肺癌方面的一致性,并初步评估两种技术是否存在稳定的放射组学特征:采用三种不同的方法对 35 名非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的对比增强 CT 和 MRI 图像进行人工分割和预处理。提取了 66 个符合图像生物标记标准化倡议的特征,这些特征是 PyRadiomics 和 LIFEx 平台所共有的。通过比较 PyRadiomics 和 LIFEx(固定成像技术)以及 MRI 和 CT 结果(相同软件),分析了具有相同数学定义的特征之间的相关性:在评估LIFEx和PyRadiomics在所考虑的重采样中的一致性时,发现CT特征和MRI特征的最大统计显著相关性分别为94%和95%。在使用同一软件检查从对比增强 CT 和 MRI 提取的特征之间的相关性时,两个软件均在 11% 的特征中发现了较高的显著对应性:结论:对于 NSCLC,(i) LIFEx 和 PyRadiomics 这两种成像技术平均有 90% 的特征是一致的,而 MRI 受重采样的影响更大;(ii) CT 和 MRI 包含的信息大多是非冗余的,但有一些形状特征,更重要的是,有一些纹理特征是两种技术都能识别出来的:识别和选择跨模态的稳定特征可能是为放射组学临床转化铺平道路的策略之一:- 超过 90% 的 LIFEx 和 PyRadiomics 特征包含相同的信息。- 10%的特征(形状、纹理)在对比增强 CT 和 MRI 中是稳定的。- 软件合规性和跨模态稳定性特征受到重采样方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信