Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2024-06-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S467924
Abdallah Damin Abukhalil, Shahd Hamad, Zain Khalid Swaileh, Aseel Wasel Ghanem, Sarah Abumadi, Raed Madia, Ni'meh Own Al-Shami
{"title":"Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.","authors":"Abdallah Damin Abukhalil, Shahd Hamad, Zain Khalid Swaileh, Aseel Wasel Ghanem, Sarah Abumadi, Raed Madia, Ni'meh Own Al-Shami","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S467924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death worldwide despite advances in treatment and prevention measures. This study aimed to explore ACS treatment strategies (ischemia-guided vs early invasive) and risk factors among patients diagnosed with ACS in a tertiary care hospital in Palestine and to evaluate related outcomes regarding future events and standard clinical guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study reviewed patient data from a Palestinian medical hospital. The study included 255 patients ≥ 18 years who were hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2021 and diagnosed with ACS. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>71% of the participants were males. The mean age was 59.59±11.56 years. Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were the most common risk factors. Unstable angina (UA) was the most prevalent ACS type, accounting for 43.1% (110) of cases, whereas NSTEMI accounted for 39.2% (100) and STEMI accounted for 17.6% (45) of cases. An ischemic-guided strategy approach was used in 71% (181) of the patients. Upon discharge, the most prescribed medication classes were antiplatelets (97.6%), statins (87.1%), PPIs (72.5%), and antihypertensives (71.8%). Treatment strategies were selected according to the clinical guidelines for most ACS types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACS management in Palestine continues to evolve to overcome barriers, decrease patient mortality, and decrease hospital stay. UA and NSTEMI were the most common ACS diagnoses at admission, and the ischemic strategy was the most common modality. The findings of this study call for an increased awareness of CVD risk factors, resource availability, and adherence to clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes and community health.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"18 ","pages":"1173-1181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S467924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death worldwide despite advances in treatment and prevention measures. This study aimed to explore ACS treatment strategies (ischemia-guided vs early invasive) and risk factors among patients diagnosed with ACS in a tertiary care hospital in Palestine and to evaluate related outcomes regarding future events and standard clinical guidelines.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed patient data from a Palestinian medical hospital. The study included 255 patients ≥ 18 years who were hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2021 and diagnosed with ACS. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS).

Results: 71% of the participants were males. The mean age was 59.59±11.56 years. Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were the most common risk factors. Unstable angina (UA) was the most prevalent ACS type, accounting for 43.1% (110) of cases, whereas NSTEMI accounted for 39.2% (100) and STEMI accounted for 17.6% (45) of cases. An ischemic-guided strategy approach was used in 71% (181) of the patients. Upon discharge, the most prescribed medication classes were antiplatelets (97.6%), statins (87.1%), PPIs (72.5%), and antihypertensives (71.8%). Treatment strategies were selected according to the clinical guidelines for most ACS types.

Conclusion: ACS management in Palestine continues to evolve to overcome barriers, decrease patient mortality, and decrease hospital stay. UA and NSTEMI were the most common ACS diagnoses at admission, and the ischemic strategy was the most common modality. The findings of this study call for an increased awareness of CVD risk factors, resource availability, and adherence to clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes and community health.

急性冠状动脉综合征:巴勒斯坦一家三级医院收治的患者的治疗策略和疗效。
背景:尽管治疗和预防措施不断进步,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)仍是全球死亡的主要原因。本研究旨在探讨巴勒斯坦一家三级甲等医院确诊的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 ACS 治疗策略(缺血引导与早期有创)和风险因素,并评估未来事件和标准临床指南的相关结果:这项回顾性队列研究回顾了一家巴勒斯坦医疗医院的患者数据。研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间住院并被诊断为 ACS 的 255 名年龄≥ 18 岁的患者。数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行分析:71%的参与者为男性。平均年龄为(59.59±11.56)岁。吸烟、糖尿病和高血压是最常见的风险因素。不稳定型心绞痛(UA)是最常见的 ACS 类型,占 43.1%(110 例),而 NSTEMI 占 39.2%(100 例),STEMI 占 17.6%(45 例)。71%的患者(181例)采用了缺血指导策略。出院时,处方药物种类最多的是抗血小板药物(97.6%)、他汀类药物(87.1%)、PPIs(72.5%)和降压药(71.8%)。大多数 ACS 类型的治疗策略都是根据临床指南选择的:结论:巴勒斯坦的 ACS 管理仍在不断发展,以克服障碍、降低患者死亡率并缩短住院时间。UA和NSTEMI是入院时最常见的ACS诊断,缺血策略是最常见的治疗方式。这项研究结果呼吁提高对心血管疾病风险因素、资源可用性的认识,并遵守临床指南,以改善患者预后和社区健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信