Sodium Hypochlorite Concentration and Postendodontic Pain - Unveiling the Optimal Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Sodium Hypochlorite Concentration and Postendodontic Pain - Unveiling the Optimal Balance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study systematically reviewed literature regarding the effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) used during root canal treatment (RCT) on postendodontic pain (PEP) and rescue analgesia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Following registration with PROSPERO (CRD42023388916), a search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials<span> of patients receiving RCT which assessed PEP at different time intervals were included. Following data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessment 2, meta-analyses were performed to evaluate PEP during the first 48 hours along with rescue analgesic intake. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five randomized controlled trials with 674 patients were included. One study exhibited a low risk of bias, while 4 raised some concerns. Patients treated with low concentrations of NaOCl (≤3%) were significantly less likely to report PEP at 24 hours (OR = 2.32; [95% CI, 1.63–3.31]; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) and 48 hours (OR = 2.49; [95% CI, 1.73–3.59]; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) as compared with high concentrations of NaOCl (≥5%). Furthermore, with low concentrations of NaOCl, significantly lesser moderate-severe PEP was reported at 24 hours (OR = 2.32; [95% CI, 1.47–3.62]; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) and 48 hours (OR = 2.35; [95% CI, 1.32–4.16]; <em>P</em> &lt; .05) and lesser analgesia was needed (OR = 2.43; [95% CI, 1.48–4.00]; <em>P</em> &lt; .05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While PEP can be influenced by several factors, low certainty evidence suggests that when NaOCl is used as an irrigant during RCT, PEP may be less likely with lower concentrations of NaOCl. Moderate certainty evidence indicates that lesser analgesia may be required with lower concentrations of NaOCl. These results should be cautiously interpreted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239924003479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study systematically reviewed literature regarding the effect of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) used during root canal treatment (RCT) on postendodontic pain (PEP) and rescue analgesia.

Methods

Following registration with PROSPERO (CRD42023388916), a search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials of patients receiving RCT which assessed PEP at different time intervals were included. Following data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessment 2, meta-analyses were performed to evaluate PEP during the first 48 hours along with rescue analgesic intake. The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials with 674 patients were included. One study exhibited a low risk of bias, while 4 raised some concerns. Patients treated with low concentrations of NaOCl (≤3%) were significantly less likely to report PEP at 24 hours (OR = 2.32; [95% CI, 1.63–3.31]; P < .05) and 48 hours (OR = 2.49; [95% CI, 1.73–3.59]; P < .05) as compared with high concentrations of NaOCl (≥5%). Furthermore, with low concentrations of NaOCl, significantly lesser moderate-severe PEP was reported at 24 hours (OR = 2.32; [95% CI, 1.47–3.62]; P < .05) and 48 hours (OR = 2.35; [95% CI, 1.32–4.16]; P < .05) and lesser analgesia was needed (OR = 2.43; [95% CI, 1.48–4.00]; P < .05).

Conclusions

While PEP can be influenced by several factors, low certainty evidence suggests that when NaOCl is used as an irrigant during RCT, PEP may be less likely with lower concentrations of NaOCl. Moderate certainty evidence indicates that lesser analgesia may be required with lower concentrations of NaOCl. These results should be cautiously interpreted.

次氯酸钠浓度与根管治疗后疼痛--揭示最佳平衡:系统回顾与元分析》。
简介:本研究系统回顾了有关根管治疗(RCT)期间使用不同浓度次氯酸钠(NaOCl)对根管治疗后疼痛(PEP)和解救镇痛效果的文献:在PROSPERO(CRD42023388916)注册后,我们使用PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase数据库进行了检索。纳入的随机对照试验(RaCT)对象是接受 RCT 治疗的患者,这些试验评估了不同时间间隔的 PEP。在进行数据提取和 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估 2 之后,进行了荟萃分析,以评估最初 48 小时内的 PEP 以及抢救性镇痛药摄入量。采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法对证据的确定性进行了评估:结果:共纳入了五项RaCT研究,涉及674名患者。其中一项研究的偏倚风险较低,而四项研究则引起了一些关注。使用低浓度 NaOCl(≤3%)治疗的患者在 24 小时后报告 PEP 的可能性显著降低(OR=2.32;[95%CI,1.63-3.31];PC 结论:尽管PEP可能受多种因素影响,但低度确定性证据表明,在RCT期间使用NaOCl作为冲洗剂时,NaOCl浓度越低,PEP的可能性越小。中度确定性证据表明,使用较低浓度的 NaOCl 可能需要较少的镇痛。应谨慎解释这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信