G Altissimi, A Musacchio, A Pace, A Greco, G Magliulo, G Iagnocco, A Ciofalo, M Ralli
{"title":"Sound therapy in patients with tinnitus: traditional sound generators vs. mobile apps.","authors":"G Altissimi, A Musacchio, A Pace, A Greco, G Magliulo, G Iagnocco, A Ciofalo, M Ralli","doi":"10.26355/eurrev_202406_36384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) is a rehabilitation approach for tinnitus that is currently considered an effective treatment with an elevated response rate. TRT is usually delivered through sound generators; however, they are often difficult to find and expensive. Recently, mobile apps have been proposed for TRT. This study aims to verify the effectiveness of TRT performed using mobile apps in reducing the adverse effects of tinnitus on the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 80 patients affected by tinnitus in category 0 (mild tinnitus) and category 1 (moderate tinnitus), according to the Jastreboff classification, were included in the study. Patients of both classes were subsequently differentiated into two homogeneous groups; the first (Group A) was treated with a traditional sound generator, and the second (Group B) using a mobile app. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory - the Italian version of the questionnaire - was used to investigate the impact of tinnitus on the quality of life in enrolled patients and evaluate their response to TRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant improvement was found in THI scores in category 0 patients for both sound generator and mobile app groups; no difference was found between the two-treatment delivery technology (-1.186, p=0.783); conversely, tinnitus improvements in category 1 patients were only reported for subjects treated using a sound generator (-14.529, p<0.001), while no significant improvement was found in patients treated using the mobile app.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the value of TRT, which in patients with mild tinnitus (category 0), can also be delivered through mobile apps with results comparable to traditional sound generators. Further studies are necessary to confirm the effects of the different tinnitus treatments available and improve the knowledge on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12152,"journal":{"name":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","volume":"28 11","pages":"3781-3786"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review for medical and pharmacological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202406_36384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) is a rehabilitation approach for tinnitus that is currently considered an effective treatment with an elevated response rate. TRT is usually delivered through sound generators; however, they are often difficult to find and expensive. Recently, mobile apps have been proposed for TRT. This study aims to verify the effectiveness of TRT performed using mobile apps in reducing the adverse effects of tinnitus on the quality of life.
Patients and methods: A total of 80 patients affected by tinnitus in category 0 (mild tinnitus) and category 1 (moderate tinnitus), according to the Jastreboff classification, were included in the study. Patients of both classes were subsequently differentiated into two homogeneous groups; the first (Group A) was treated with a traditional sound generator, and the second (Group B) using a mobile app. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory - the Italian version of the questionnaire - was used to investigate the impact of tinnitus on the quality of life in enrolled patients and evaluate their response to TRT.
Results: A significant improvement was found in THI scores in category 0 patients for both sound generator and mobile app groups; no difference was found between the two-treatment delivery technology (-1.186, p=0.783); conversely, tinnitus improvements in category 1 patients were only reported for subjects treated using a sound generator (-14.529, p<0.001), while no significant improvement was found in patients treated using the mobile app.
Conclusions: This study confirms the value of TRT, which in patients with mild tinnitus (category 0), can also be delivered through mobile apps with results comparable to traditional sound generators. Further studies are necessary to confirm the effects of the different tinnitus treatments available and improve the knowledge on this topic.
目的:耳鸣训练疗法(TRT)是一种治疗耳鸣的康复方法,目前被认为是一种反应率较高的有效治疗方法。耳鸣再训练疗法通常通过发声器进行,但发声器通常很难找到,而且价格昂贵。最近,有人提出了用于 TRT 的移动应用程序。本研究旨在验证使用手机应用程序进行 TRT 在减少耳鸣对生活质量的不良影响方面的有效性:本研究共纳入了 80 名耳鸣患者,根据 Jastreboff 分类法,他们分别属于 0 类(轻度耳鸣)和 1 类(中度耳鸣)。这两类患者随后被分为两组,第一组(A 组)使用传统发声器,第二组(B 组)使用移动应用程序。耳鸣障碍量表(意大利语版问卷)用于调查耳鸣对入组患者生活质量的影响,并评估他们对 TRT 的反应:结果:在发声器组和手机应用组中,0类患者的THI评分均有明显改善;两种治疗技术之间没有差异(-1.186,p=0.783);相反,只有使用发声器治疗的受试者的1类患者耳鸣症状有所改善(-14.529,p):本研究证实了 TRT 的价值,对于轻度耳鸣(0 类)患者,也可通过移动应用程序进行治疗,效果与传统发声器不相上下。有必要开展进一步研究,以确认不同耳鸣治疗方法的效果,并增进对这一主题的了解。
期刊介绍:
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, a fortnightly journal, acts as an information exchange tool on several aspects of medical and pharmacological sciences. It publishes reviews, original articles, and results from original research.
The purposes of the Journal are to encourage interdisciplinary discussions and to contribute to the advancement of medicine.
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences includes:
-Editorials-
Reviews-
Original articles-
Trials-
Brief communications-
Case reports (only if of particular interest and accompanied by a short review)