Revisit of ballast hypothesis in the Bay of Bengal

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
V.V.S.S. Sarma
{"title":"Revisit of ballast hypothesis in the Bay of Bengal","authors":"V.V.S.S. Sarma","doi":"10.1016/j.marchem.2024.104422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ballast hypothesis involving rapid sinking of organic carbon in association with riverine mineral particles is proposed in the Bay of Bengal (BoB) in 1991. The ballast hypothesis was used intensively to explain several biogeochemical processes, such as low primary production, weak oxygen minimum zone (OMZ), low bacterial respiration rates and lack of denitrification in the BoB. In contrast, the recent measurements indicated that high primary production, intense OMZ with occurrence of denitrification in the sinking particles but not in the water column. Hence the ballast hypothesis is re-visited using the recent experiments conducted on sinking particle flux using sediment traps, <sup>234</sup>Thorium based particulate organic carbon export, particle back scatter, water column biogeochemistry, stable isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen of sinking particles and surface sediment of shelf region. The isotopic data suggests the sinking organic matter is mainly contributed by in-situ production supported by dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). The amount of organic matter decomposed within the water column was higher in the north and decreased towards southern BoB and it is consistent with the spatial pattern of rate of sinking particle flux suggesting against ballast hypothesis of removal of organic matter to the sediment with weaker modifications in the water column. The higher organic carbon trapped in the middle and deep than shallow traps was observed and it is attributed to cross-shelf transport of sedimentary organic carbon as evidenced from the back-scatter of particles and isotopic composition carbon and nitrogen of shelf sediments. Variations in the river discharge did not show impact on the magnitude of sinking carbon fluxes indicating that river discharge is not a drive force for higher sinking carbon fluxes to deep BoB than hitherto hypothesized as ballast effect.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18219,"journal":{"name":"Marine Chemistry","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 104422"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304420324000732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ballast hypothesis involving rapid sinking of organic carbon in association with riverine mineral particles is proposed in the Bay of Bengal (BoB) in 1991. The ballast hypothesis was used intensively to explain several biogeochemical processes, such as low primary production, weak oxygen minimum zone (OMZ), low bacterial respiration rates and lack of denitrification in the BoB. In contrast, the recent measurements indicated that high primary production, intense OMZ with occurrence of denitrification in the sinking particles but not in the water column. Hence the ballast hypothesis is re-visited using the recent experiments conducted on sinking particle flux using sediment traps, 234Thorium based particulate organic carbon export, particle back scatter, water column biogeochemistry, stable isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen of sinking particles and surface sediment of shelf region. The isotopic data suggests the sinking organic matter is mainly contributed by in-situ production supported by dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). The amount of organic matter decomposed within the water column was higher in the north and decreased towards southern BoB and it is consistent with the spatial pattern of rate of sinking particle flux suggesting against ballast hypothesis of removal of organic matter to the sediment with weaker modifications in the water column. The higher organic carbon trapped in the middle and deep than shallow traps was observed and it is attributed to cross-shelf transport of sedimentary organic carbon as evidenced from the back-scatter of particles and isotopic composition carbon and nitrogen of shelf sediments. Variations in the river discharge did not show impact on the magnitude of sinking carbon fluxes indicating that river discharge is not a drive force for higher sinking carbon fluxes to deep BoB than hitherto hypothesized as ballast effect.

重新审视孟加拉湾的压舱物假设
1991 年,孟加拉湾(BoB)提出了压舱物假说,即有机碳与河流矿物颗粒一起快速下沉。压舱物假说被广泛用于解释孟加拉湾的一些生物地球化学过程,如初级生产力低、最小含氧区(OMZ)薄弱、细菌呼吸速率低和缺乏反硝化作用等。与此相反,最近的测量结果表明,初级生产量高,OMZ 强,下沉颗粒中有反硝化作用,但水体中没有。因此,利用沉积物捕集器对下沉颗粒通量、基于 234 钍的颗粒有机碳输出、颗粒后向散射、水柱生物地球化学、下沉颗粒和陆架地区表层沉积物的碳和氮的稳定同位素组成进行了最新实验,重新审视了压舱物假说。同位素数据表明,下沉的有机物主要是由溶解有机氮(DON)支持的原位生产贡献的。在水体中分解的有机物量在北部较高,向南部 BoB 减少,这与下沉颗粒通量速率的空间模式一致,表明有机物在水体中的变化较弱,与沉积物中有机物去除的压载假说相悖。从颗粒的后向散射以及陆架沉积物碳和氮的同位素组成可以看出,中层和深层沉积物的有机碳含量高于浅层沉积物,这归因于沉积有机碳的跨陆架迁移。河流排水量的变化并不影响沉积碳通量的大小,这表明河流排水量并不是向深海沉积碳通量增加的驱动力,而不是迄今假设的压舱物效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Marine Chemistry
Marine Chemistry 化学-海洋学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Marine Chemistry is an international medium for the publication of original studies and occasional reviews in the field of chemistry in the marine environment, with emphasis on the dynamic approach. The journal endeavours to cover all aspects, from chemical processes to theoretical and experimental work, and, by providing a central channel of communication, to speed the flow of information in this relatively new and rapidly expanding discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信